Is regulation wins the first tiebreaker? Or head to head?
as Old hound suggested, today's loss may have put things out of reach.
bummer but we're not statistically out of it yet.
I would certainly think we may receive more from a top 5 pick than any of the bottom 4/5 forwards in our line up.Traditionally top 5 picks are not traded in their 16 year old year. It may hurt our run more than help it.
Name | Team | SH% | G | SOG |
Garreffa, Joseph | OTT | 25.9% | 28 | 108 |
Giroux, Damien | SAG | 23.8% | 34 | 143 |
Jenik, Jan | HAM | 23.4% | 22 | 94 |
Byfield, Quinton | SBY | 23.4% | 32 | 137 |
Kerins, Rory | SOO | 23.0% | 28 | 122 |
For sure, would love to see Kerins attempt more shots. And FYI, Quinn 6, Robertson 8, McMichael 26, Kaliyev 42.
Heard from ohl scouts that sit around me that this is the year of top talent coming from the USA. We must make sure that who we draft will show up because more and more USA players are staying in USA leagues or going the college route. Great site for OHL draft prospects.ProspectPipeline has a few locals ranked in the OHL Draft Rankings:
30 Devin Mauro
58 Connor Toms
Any others?
2020 OHL Draft Ranking: February’s Top-150
Hockey Pops,ProspectPipeline has a few locals ranked in the OHL Draft Rankings:
30 Devin Mauro
58 Connor Toms
Any others?
2020 OHL Draft Ranking: February’s Top-150
That depends on the answers to the questions I asked.@Prospect Pipeline would you like me to edit/remove my post above?
According to my calculations, Kerins is a top 5 sniper league-wide.
To calculate this, I looked at player stats on the OHL website, and sorted by goals (descending). I exported the results to excel (it gives top 100 results), and then in excel I divided goals by shots and sorted by the new column. I knew he was leading the team in goals, but had no idea he was converting his chances at this kind of rate.[TBODY] [/TBODY]
Name Team SH% G SOG Garreffa, Joseph OTT 25.9% 28 108 Giroux, Damien SAG 23.8% 34 143 Jenik, Jan HAM 23.4% 22 94 Byfield, Quinton SBY 23.4% 32 137 Kerins, Rory SOO 23.0% 28 122
Is that a good thing? Shooting at a 23%+ clip means he's been getting somewhat lucky with shots as usually they dont go in a quarter of the time, so hes bound to go through some regression right? Whereas if he was shooting like 18% you'd be more happy because that is less likely to go throuh a regression
You're on record saying that shooting percentage is based entirely on the skill of the shooter and quality of the chances.