Post-Game Talk: Game 68 - Krug wins it in OT - BRUINS 2 Sunrise 1 F/OT

KillerMillerTime

Registered User
Jun 30, 2019
6,775
5,355
Bleeding so what? Wobbly my arse. This is hockey not lawn bowling.

Everyone that’s ever played knows Carlo should’ve got a hand on that elbow. Let the league office handle it and get over it.

Lol, Dadanov just happened to look and see where Carlo
was and by accident or coincidence just happen to deliver a perfectly placed elbow directly in the center of his face.

Where I went to school 1+1 = 2

1 Dadanov checks to see where Carlo is

1 Dadanov instantly places a perfect elbow in Carlo's
face on a puck handling move and elbow extension
I don't recall ever seeing being inadvertent in 50+
years of watching hockey.

= 2, A deliberate elbow that KO's Carlo and he absolutely
was out.
 

whatsbruin

Registered User
Feb 27, 2002
7,485
2,363
Central, NY
Yeah it wasn't easy for him when he got traded, he was close with Marchy and the boys.

He talked about that in the Spitting Chiclets podcast few months ago, worth a listen.
I didn't think Accari was traded, didn't he leave on his own, signing as a ufa ?
I don't know if the B's offered him a contract, but I don't think he was traded.
 

Spooner st

Registered User
Jan 14, 2007
12,944
8,100
honestly pretty tired of seeing Bruce with his little f***ing smirk every time we get f***ed over by a call or a cheap shot. Just once i would love to see him show some f***ing emotion that he cares and snap and blow up on the clowns in stripes .
That would only satisfy your primal instinct. It's up to the GM's/ Governors to stop this bs.
 

BruinsFanSince94

The Perfect Fan ™
Sep 28, 2017
32,709
43,379
New England
There's a comment previous here on this thread that mentions how we should rotate our tenders in the playoffs.
My name is nORRis8, and I endorse this message.

I don't agree, especially with how excellent Rask has been. You go with the hot hand and ride it. If Rask falters, and halak gets a shot and shuts the door, fine.

But it's the playoffs. You go with one guy whenever possible. Rotating is a sign of trouble.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NDiesel

NDiesel

Registered User
Mar 22, 2008
9,250
9,721
NWO
What is wrong with you? Do you have eyes?

1) Carlo was BLEEDING

2) He was WOBBLY and needed assistance getting up
and escorted off the ice.

So your wrong on both counts.

That was absolutely a dirty play. I have never seen
a guy elbow a player with that force by "accident".
It was in no way an extension from a play with a
stick. He deliberately jabbed him with the elbow.
No question in my mind about it.

Completely disagree that there was any intent behind it. He was trying to toe drag the puck which pushed his elbow back - if you stand up right now and try the same motion, there is no way you can do it where he was on the ice without getting your elbow back. It's a frustrating play and should've been 4 minutes IMO regardless of intent, but I would be surprised if there was any incoming discipline.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BruinDust

sarge88

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jan 29, 2003
25,520
21,028
Double minor is not an allowed call for an elbow. Only allowed for spearing, head butting, butt-ending (for all three, if attempted, but no actual contact), and high sticking. roughing is not included, as two roughing minors that we call “double rough” are actually two distinct and separate applications of the rule, though they are treated the same way when a short handed goal is scored.

Didn't know that...

Strikes me as odd that it can't be called for an elbow.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ladyfan

nORRis8

The NHL, the stupidest League ever.
Sep 16, 2015
3,708
6,301
RedDeer, Alberta
I don't agree, especially with how excellent Rask has been. You go with the hot hand and ride it. If Rask falters, and halak gets a shot and shuts the door, fine.

But it's the playoffs. You go with one guy whenever possible. Rotating is a sign of trouble.

To rotate throughout the year then have a guy suddenly play (if we go deep)...25 -28 straight games....ouch.

I mentioned a few weeks ago the thought of rotating at least in the first 2 rounds then going with the hot hand....a la Cheevers 1970
 

BruinDust

Registered User
Aug 2, 2005
24,375
21,821
Completely disagree that there was any intent behind it. He was trying to toe drag the puck which pushed his elbow back - if you stand up right now and try the same motion, there is no way you can do it where he was on the ice without getting your elbow back. It's a frustrating play and should've been 4 minutes IMO regardless of intent, but I would be surprised if there was any incoming discipline.

I agree I didn't see any intent there either.

Speaking of which, Jack Edwards sounded like a complete you-know-what last night, went on and on over the elbow. Like give it a rest Jack. I've always tolerated Edwards, but he's been on a different level of annoying this year.
 

Gordoff

Formerly: Strafer
Jan 18, 2003
24,999
25,094
The Hub
Completely disagree that there was any intent behind it. He was trying to toe drag the puck which pushed his elbow back - if you stand up right now and try the same motion, there is no way you can do it where he was on the ice without getting your elbow back. It's a frustrating play and should've been 4 minutes IMO regardless of intent, but I would be surprised if there was any incoming discipline.
If you hit someone with your car and injure them the law is that you are supposed to have full control of your vehicle. Intent isn't really as big an issue as the result. He did look over his shoulder, he did knock Carlo out of the game and maybe even more. He should've gotten his ass kicked asap after. That didn't happen and if he isn't suspended it sets a precedent and proves that the NHL is full of shit in regards to protecting players from head-shots. If it were a Bruin who commited that foul he'd be suspended, no two ways about it. Double standards are a poor way to govern and IMO Jacobs should get involved as this seems to be a continuing trend.
 

KlausJopling

Registered User
Feb 17, 2003
6,146
3,048
CT
Visit site
Didn't think the Bruins especially the forwards had good games, a lot of just handing the puck to people who weren't ready for it. Ritchie was pretty good, while not a superstar in the defensive zone he has been very good beating the defender along the boards to get the puck out or make a pass to start the breakout.

If Carlo is out im guessing Clifton comes in and Lauzon moves up to play with Krug.
 

NDiesel

Registered User
Mar 22, 2008
9,250
9,721
NWO
If you hit someone with your car and injure them the law is that you are supposed to have full control of your vehicle. Intent isn't really as big an issue as the result. He did look over his shoulder, he did knock Carlo out of the game and maybe even more. He should've gotten his ass kicked asap after. That didn't happen and if he isn't suspended it sets a precedent and proves that the NHL is full of shit in regards to protecting players from head-shots. If it were a Bruin who commited that foul he'd be suspended, no two ways about it. Double standards are a poor way to govern and IMO Jacobs should get involved as this seems to be a continuing trend.
This isn't driving a car, intent does matter - for example, should the player that cut Boychuk's eyelid be suspended or penalized for not being in control of his skate?
 

NDiesel

Registered User
Mar 22, 2008
9,250
9,721
NWO
I agree I didn't see any intent there either.

Speaking of which, Jack Edwards sounded like a complete you-know-what last night, went on and on over the elbow. Like give it a rest Jack. I've always tolerated Edwards, but he's been on a different level of annoying this year.
He has games where I really wish he'd just shut his mouth and commentate on what's going on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Glove Malfunction

Spooner st

Registered User
Jan 14, 2007
12,944
8,100
I don't agree, especially with how excellent Rask has been. You go with the hot hand and ride it. If Rask falters, and halak gets a shot and shuts the door, fine.

But it's the playoffs. You go with one guy whenever possible. Rotating is a sign of trouble.
It all depends on the situation. If your main goalie performs better with a less heavy load... and your backup is more than qualified to win you bigger games when called upon... why not use all the options available to you. There's lots of positives on using all your options. Keep them alert so they can perform at their best. Including every player at every position.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bbfan419

Spooner st

Registered User
Jan 14, 2007
12,944
8,100
This isn't driving a car, intent does matter - for example, should the player that cut Boychuk's eyelid be suspended or penalized for not being in control of his skate?
If players are responsible for their stick, shouldn't they also be responsible for what hold their stick?
 
  • Like
Reactions: bbfan419

NDiesel

Registered User
Mar 22, 2008
9,250
9,721
NWO
If players are responsible for their stick, shouldn't they also be responsible for what hold their stick?
Agreed he should, and he got a penalty for it, just like you would for an intentional high stick - you would never get a suspension for an intentional high stick just because the guy is injured.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spooner st

DarrenBanks56

Registered User
May 16, 2005
12,242
8,111
To rotate throughout the year then have a guy suddenly play (if we go deep)...25 -28 straight games....ouch.

I mentioned a few weeks ago the thought of rotating at least in the first 2 rounds then going with the hot hand....a la Cheevers 1970

At first I wasnt for this idea. I was all for go with one goalie in the playoffs. But youre right. They are used to this rotation. And I would stick with it. They are both great goalies.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad