YP44
Registered User
While that proposal is outragerously bad, Calgary wouldn't trade Tkachuk for Provorov given the chance. That isn't meant as a knock on Provorov either.
only because of Calgary's depth on D IMO
While that proposal is outragerously bad, Calgary wouldn't trade Tkachuk for Provorov given the chance. That isn't meant as a knock on Provorov either.
Would...... DeBrusk, Grzelyck and a number 1........................ get Boston Tkachuk ???
Would...... DeBrusk, Grzelyck and a number 1........................ get Boston Tkachuk ???
What a horrible postMy proposal of Monahan for Schmaltz + from AZ was laughed at by the usual suspects and now there is no way AZ would ever do that since Monahan's value, which was apparently at an all time low, is even lower now because he's been exposed and is actually trash.
Is the number 1 top 3?Would...... DeBrusk, Grzelyck and a number 1........................ get Boston Tkachuk ???
My proposal of Monahan for Schmaltz + from AZ was laughed at by the usual suspects and now there is no way AZ would ever do that since Monahan's value, which was apparently at an all time low, is even lower now because he's been exposed and is actually trash.
Would...... DeBrusk, Grzelyck and a number 1........................ get Boston Tkachuk ???
Yes, Keith.Would...... DeBrusk, Grzelyck and a number 1........................ get Boston Tkachuk ???
DivisionSince when is Monahan a trash?
how come trash is scoring more than schmaltz?
My proposal of Monahan for Schmaltz + from AZ was laughed at by the usual suspects and now there is no way AZ would ever do that since Monahan's value, which was apparently at an all time low, is even lower now because he's been exposed and is actually trash.
Enjoy the 1st round bounces for the next couple seasons and the impending long term rebuild after we pull a Buffalo and let all our young guys lose value.I wouldn't take Schmaltz as the center piece for Monahan, but thanks for your uniformed opinion anyways.
Why are you obsessed with Schmaltz lol. At best he is lateral to Monahan.Enjoy the 1st round bounces for the next couple seasons and the impending long term rebuild after we pull a Buffalo and let all our young guys lose value.
Its not about Schmaltz, its just an example I'm sure there are other players with upside too. I am not content with mediocrity.Why are you obsessed with Schmaltz lol. At best he is lateral to Monahan.
Not that I disagree with the premise but why Schmaltz, he isn't better and isn't much youngerIts not about Schmaltz, its just an example I'm sure there are other players with upside too. I am not content with mediocrity.
This team needs to do something. Make a decision. Doing nothing is unacceptable. We need to do something bold, take a gamble on someone with upside. We burned our picks on Hamonic, our cupboards are bare, our young guys are prime aged. They are what they are, and what they are isn't good enough. It's time to move on with the next wave of Valimaki, Tkachuk, Andersson, Kylington, Zary etc.
Provided my reasoning in the thread. Younger, cheaper, signed longer, faster, more complete two way game, better fit for Ward's system, play driver, positional flexibility. Coyotes needed goals and I felt like Monahan had the reputation to provide that. Selling high and buying low.Not that I disagree with the premise but why Schmaltz, he isn't a lot better and isn't much younger
Got it, you just really like Schmaltz more than most probablyProvided my reasoning in the thread. Younger, cheaper, signed longer, faster, more complete two way game, better fit for Ward's system, play driver, positional flexibility. Coyotes needed goals and I felt like Monahan had the reputation to provide that. Selling high and buying low.
Interesting. I'd do it as a Flames fanHanifin & Monahan for Mantha & '21 1st (unprotected) as a base.
& (if needed) +minor piece(s) on both ends to facilitate/even.
Should be 60-40 going forwardCan I suggest not playing Rittich 1 in 6 games?
I get Markstrom is the starter... no argument but 2 out of 6 might help in a condensed schedule.