Well, if I'm reading your link correctly, it says the following:
He played 41 games, and his most common linemates were:
35.3% HEMSKY,A - PERRON,D
19.4% EBERLE,J - HALL,T
17% EBERLE,J - PERRON,D
15.6% EBERLE,J - YAKUPOV,N
12.7% EBERLE,J - SMYTH,R
That doesn't make much sense.
A better source is stats.hockeyanalysis.com. It breaks it down individually and says:
32% Perron
28% Eberle
26% Hemsky
21% Yakupov
18% Smyth
16% Hall
14% Jones
10% Gordon
The rest are all less than 10%, so I didn't bother with them.
I would say these players are for the most part top six players, and are all better offensively than Arcobello - even Jones and Gordon.
He was playing with some talent. Yes, he got demoted, but he wasn't doing enough to stay in the top six.
Have you figured out what Homesick is talking about when he says "Arcobello has twice as many goals in half the amount of games"? Since you're into "overstatements", I'm sure you must have flagged that one as an issue ...
Yeah, I didn't quite remember who Jason Krog was until I wandered into your argument, but I have a hard time imagining Arcobello having twice as many goals as anybody.
But... he does do a lot of little things right and protects the puck well. That tends to result in "not killing the play" and if you play with reasonably talented players, protect and keep the puck without killing the play... well you will get points.
As for the Dobber link... it's a high quality page and helpful because it breaks down *actual* line mates and by quarter. Perhaps you didn't read far enough down the play, where it shows the quarter by quarter breakdown. I'll summarize it:
1st Quarter:
* 12 points in 20 games
* 10 of those points in the first 10 games thru the last week of Oct
* (not on the page, but NHL.com shows that Sam Gagner also arrived back at the end of Oct)
* Most commonly on a line with Hemsky and Perron, second most common line mates Eberle and Hall
2nd Quarter:
* 4 points in 11 games
* Spend 24% of his time on a line with Hemmer & Hall... but didn't get any EV points while on that line... must have been a slump
* Spent the rest of his time Joensuu, Jones, Smyth and a struggling Yakupov. Hardly top-six, even on our team
3rd Quarter:
* 2 points in 10 games. Struggling and looks as though the hot streak was long gone
* Even playing with Eberle and Yakupov he didn't pick up any points (but what kind of buttery soft line is that anyway????)
* Picked up his only points playing with Gazdic/Jones and Hemsky/Perron
So... what I take from this? The guy was clearly playing well in the first 10-15 games of the season. He was putting up points and making the most of his opportunity with talented players. When Gagner came back, he moved down a few slots and stopped producing. Not only is this not rocket science, it meets my "eye" test, having watched the majority of these games.
In the second quarter he was in a slump clearly... and in the third quarter he reinforced a lack of production... was he pouting from the wrongful demotion? Keyed in on after the hot start? Just a regular slump? Don't know... what I didn't realize (I'd reduced my attention by then) was that he still got a decent amount of time with reasonable line mates and didn't do much with it.
Lesson: don't mess with chemistry... let a hot streak continue... and don't expect consistency from first year players.