Prospect Info: With the 39th Overall Pick the New York Rangers Select Olof Lindbom

Joey Bones

***** 2k16
Jul 27, 2012
10,663
4,409
Nowhere
I think he'll rebound. No point in discussing other prospects picked after him now until he proves he's an NHLer or not. It's still way too early on most of these prospects!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: GeorgeKaplan

nyr2k2

Can't Beat Him
Jul 30, 2005
45,716
32,953
Maryland
'benny liked the kid' is meaningless to me regardless of when he was picked...we've had some goalies that have worked out very well but we've also had guys that benny wanted that have turned out beyond awful.
Thank you. I've been down this path many times and I feel like I'm arguing against the whole board. I don't mind having an unpopular opinion, but it's tiresome. :laugh:
 

pblawr

Registered User
Jul 16, 2016
496
1,151
I wasn't a huge fan of the pick, but sometimes the dramatics about how bad it was go so far overboard that it's tough not to feel compelled to defend it.

1) It wasn't a huge reach. McKenzie's scouting poll had him at 53, only 14 spots away from where he got drafted. By comparison, Henriksson (drafted at 58 vs 83 in McKenzie's poll), Ragnarsson (73 vs not ranked in top 93), and Jones (68 vs 88) were all bigger reaches.

2) It wasn't just that Allaire loved him. He started for Sweden's U18 team and led the U-18 tournament with a .950 save percentage. That's better than Spencer Knight (.936) who went 13th overall this year. I'm not saying save percentage is everything, but think about the reaction to Askarov outplaying Knight at the U18's this year. Lindbom did that too. And it wasn't just that he had a good U-18 tournament either. He started for his U20 team as a 17 year old player.

3) The fact that he didn't play very much this year is unfortunate, but everything else - getting picked up by an Allsvenskan team, getting picked for Sweden's U20 team - indicates he's doing totally fine.

I don't really know how to evaluate goalies, so I can relate to the sentiment about drafting a goalie with a high pick, but 1) it happens. There were 3 goalies who were drafted higher than Lindbom was this year and 2) this was actually a relatively on-the-board pick that is performing as expected.
 

nyr2k2

Can't Beat Him
Jul 30, 2005
45,716
32,953
Maryland
I wasn't a huge fan of the pick, but sometimes the dramatics about how bad it was go so far overboard that it's tough not to feel compelled to defend it.

1) It wasn't a huge reach. McKenzie's scouting poll had him at 53, only 14 spots away from where he got drafted. By comparison, Henriksson (drafted at 58 vs 83 in McKenzie's poll), Ragnarsson (73 vs not ranked in top 93), and Jones (68 vs 88) were all bigger reaches.

2) It wasn't just that Allaire loved him. He started for Sweden's U18 team and led the U-18 tournament with a .950 save percentage. That's better than Spencer Knight (.936) who went 13th overall this year. I'm not saying save percentage is everything, but think about the reaction to Askarov outplaying Knight at the U18's this year. Lindbom did that too. And it wasn't just that he had a good U-18 tournament either. He started for his U20 team as a 17 year old player.

3) The fact that he didn't play very much this year is unfortunate, but everything else - getting picked up by an Allsvenskan team, getting picked for Sweden's U20 team - indicates he's doing totally fine.

I don't really know how to evaluate goalies, so I can relate to the sentiment about drafting a goalie with a high pick, but 1) it happens. There were 3 goalies who were drafted higher than Lindbom was this year and 2) this was actually a relatively on-the-board pick that is performing as expected.
These are fair points. For me, though, it wasn't so much that it was a reach by a round or so, it was that it was a reach for a position that we really didn't need to reach for. That's all. Beyond the fact that this was in no way a position of need (certainly not that high in the draft), I have no problems with the player himself and look forward to seeing what he does this year.
 

n8

WAAAAAAA!!!
Nov 7, 2002
11,497
2,754
san francisco
Visit site
I wasn't a huge fan of the pick, but sometimes the dramatics about how bad it was go so far overboard that it's tough not to feel compelled to defend it.

1) It wasn't a huge reach. McKenzie's scouting poll had him at 53, only 14 spots away from where he got drafted. By comparison, Henriksson (drafted at 58 vs 83 in McKenzie's poll), Ragnarsson (73 vs not ranked in top 93), and Jones (68 vs 88) were all bigger reaches.

2) It wasn't just that Allaire loved him. He started for Sweden's U18 team and led the U-18 tournament with a .950 save percentage. That's better than Spencer Knight (.936) who went 13th overall this year. I'm not saying save percentage is everything, but think about the reaction to Askarov outplaying Knight at the U18's this year. Lindbom did that too. And it wasn't just that he had a good U-18 tournament either. He started for his U20 team as a 17 year old player.

3) The fact that he didn't play very much this year is unfortunate, but everything else - getting picked up by an Allsvenskan team, getting picked for Sweden's U20 team - indicates he's doing totally fine.

I don't really know how to evaluate goalies, so I can relate to the sentiment about drafting a goalie with a high pick, but 1) it happens. There were 3 goalies who were drafted higher than Lindbom was this year and 2) this was actually a relatively on-the-board pick that is performing as expected.

i would love it if the Rangers could release their list. Like what did their list look like in 2005 or 2008? I wouldn't expect to see a list from a recent year but from one 10+ years ago? Would be fascinating to see.
 

GeorgeKaplan

Registered User
Dec 19, 2011
9,094
8,376
New Jersey
i would love it if the Rangers could release their list. Like what did their list look like in 2005 or 2008? I wouldn't expect to see a list from a recent year but from one 10+ years ago? Would be fascinating to see.
HFNYR would collapse on itself if that ever happened
 

007

You 'Orns!
Feb 11, 2004
3,763
180
Mannahatta
I hope they draft/sign kids based on more than just "Allaire loves him," since the reality is most of the goalies we bring in do not pan out. Which of course, is not itself unusual, but with the 39th pick I'd like more than "our position coach loves the guy."

The reality is, however, that Lindbom seemed to grade out in the 3rd-5th round range. If they really liked him, he might not have been there in the third. Still, too early, too raw of a prospect, no at a position of great need. I won't ever get it, but whatever.

I think you're right. What I'm saying is, I hope it's a lot more than "Allaire loves him" PLUS this judgment being based on one tournament. He's our prospect now, though, and I hope he ends up being a stud who gives All-Star Shestyorkin a run for his money. Hopefully, in 8 years or so, we're arguing over whom to keep and whom to trade for the #1OA. :naughty:
 
  • Like
Reactions: nyr2k2

GlasgowNewYorkRanger

Registered User
Dec 7, 2017
703
771
I don't know if you guys ever watched Frasier but there was an episode where Frasier lost a tape of one of his shows (or found out that it was missing) and found a crazy fan that had a copy of the tape. The fan was so obsessed with him, Frasier realized that obsessions aren't healthy and left the tape with him and rendered his collection imperfect. It was as if Gorton wanted to render this rebuild imperfect by drafting this guy and declining the tape.

Absolute class, this should be stickied for preservation :laugh:
 

Mikos87

Registered User
Mar 19, 2002
9,064
3,244
Visit site
I will say that you are going to see the trend of teams taking goalies early in the second continue. You need your backup to play 20-30 games nowadays and win if you want to even make the playoffs. During the 2019 draft you saw a run on goalies early in the 2nd, and this has happened in previous drafts- not always in the 2nd round, sometimes it's in the 3rd.

Every year you get around 20 goalies drafted, and if a team wants their guy, they will have to take them where they can get him.

Personally speaking, like many others on the board, I would have preferred if they went with one of the 3 picks taken right after Olof or Akil Thomas. Other than maybe Madden who was a reach at the time, I don't have many complaints.

I'm not a goalie expert by any means, but I think Olof playing in the WJC-20 and having a healthy season where he gets 30-40 games at the least will do wonders for his stock on these boards.
 

egelband

Registered User
Sep 6, 2008
15,929
14,580
Thank you. I've been down this path many times and I feel like I'm arguing against the whole board. I don't mind having an unpopular opinion, but it's tiresome. :laugh:
Unless there's some evidence that a team was planning to take this guy between 39 and the next rangers pick... Or the Rangers forth rounder for that matter... It's a pure pick. But maybe someone else legitimately had plans to pick him and the rangers just had to have him. Dunno
 

cwede

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Sep 1, 2010
9,809
7,692
i think this deserves to be here

Pronman: Do you have an idea of how the goalie situation is going to look?

Thomas Monten (Swedish WJC coach): Olof Lindbom (New York Rangers) was hurt last season, but the year before he was outstanding. Two years ago, I thought he was one of the best goalies to ever come out of our U18 program. He was a difference maker then. But he hasn’t played much lately, so we’ll see. We have like five or six really good goalies, but as of now we don’t know who is going to be the starter.

Q&A: Sweden world junior coach Tomas Monten on prospects for...
 

nyr2k2

Can't Beat Him
Jul 30, 2005
45,716
32,953
Maryland
i think this deserves to be here
Yeah, it's high praise for sure. He's an interesting prospect.

However, being terrific at 16, 17, doesn't necessarily portend any future success. Daniel Bernhardt had 63 points in 38 games between in the J18 Elit at 17/18. Then he killed the J20 SuperElit as an 18-year-old to the tune of 61 points in 44 games. Then, he...completely stagnated for a couple years, before eventually being befallen by injuries and retiring.

So, it's great that Lindbom has looked so good in a few international tournaments. He was a known, ranked player, and that's why. Hopefully he can stay healthy and have an actual good year for his club, whether it's in J20 or Allsvenskan.
 

nyr2k2

Can't Beat Him
Jul 30, 2005
45,716
32,953
Maryland
Antoine Lafleur won't be 31 until the end of the year!
That one was amazing. Like, yeah he sucked for his D+1 and D+2 years in the Q, but he didn't even give it a go in the ECHL or AHL or anything. He didn't even go to CIS (as it was then known) for a year or two to try to get back on track. He just up and quit after finishing his time in Major Junior. THAT is the definition of a wasted pick.
 
Feb 27, 2002
37,903
7,976
NYC
That one was amazing. Like, yeah he sucked for his D+1 and D+2 years in the Q, but he didn't even give it a go in the ECHL or AHL or anything. He didn't even go to CIS (as it was then known) for a year or two to try to get back on track. He just up and quit after finishing his time in Major Junior. THAT is the definition of a wasted pick.
And we never really ever heard anything about him.
 

SnowblindNYR

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Nov 16, 2011
52,182
30,778
Brooklyn, NY
I wasn't a huge fan of the pick, but sometimes the dramatics about how bad it was go so far overboard that it's tough not to feel compelled to defend it.

1) It wasn't a huge reach. McKenzie's scouting poll had him at 53, only 14 spots away from where he got drafted. By comparison, Henriksson (drafted at 58 vs 83 in McKenzie's poll), Ragnarsson (73 vs not ranked in top 93), and Jones (68 vs 88) were all bigger reaches.

2) It wasn't just that Allaire loved him. He started for Sweden's U18 team and led the U-18 tournament with a .950 save percentage. That's better than Spencer Knight (.936) who went 13th overall this year. I'm not saying save percentage is everything, but think about the reaction to Askarov outplaying Knight at the U18's this year. Lindbom did that too. And it wasn't just that he had a good U-18 tournament either. He started for his U20 team as a 17 year old player.

3) The fact that he didn't play very much this year is unfortunate, but everything else - getting picked up by an Allsvenskan team, getting picked for Sweden's U20 team - indicates he's doing totally fine.

I don't really know how to evaluate goalies, so I can relate to the sentiment about drafting a goalie with a high pick, but 1) it happens. There were 3 goalies who were drafted higher than Lindbom was this year and 2) this was actually a relatively on-the-board pick that is performing as expected.

But we didn't need a goalie prospect that's the biggest problem.
 

nyr2k2

Can't Beat Him
Jul 30, 2005
45,716
32,953
Maryland
And we never really ever heard anything about him.
Right. He just dropped off the map. There was a random guy somewhere on HF that said years later he was playing pond hockey with LaFleur, and other than being tall, didn't look like he had been a hockey player. Bad skater and all. But never really anything from reporters, no announcement that he retired, etc.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad