You gave up a waiver wire pick up for him. A 23 yr old former 1st rounder
That is the real key here. Fabbri moves from a 4th line/Scratch role likely to a 3rd line role here in Detroit.
De la Rose was 2nd rounder.
Yeah, my point was just that Fabbri is not the same player anymore as at the draft moment of hopes. He is more wrecked than Svechnikov in the past.
De la Rose was 2nd rounder.
Yeah, my point was just that Fabbri is not the same player anymore as at the draft moment of hopes. He is more wrecked than Svechnikov in the past.
Horvat was in the 2013 draft not 2014. And wanting Fabbri over Larkin in 2014 wasn't a bad call at the time...
Right, but some other team paid that 2nd rounder price. And StL paid the Fabbri 1st round price.
This is a dime a dozen waiver-wire pickup for a guy who was a good prospect at once in his life who fell in StL's rankings due to a lot of injuries.
This move is 100% similar to the Wings picking up Dan Cleary from Chicago in the mid 2000s for nothing. If Fabbri can mirror Danny Cleary, that would be a home run pickup.
At least he's making moves! LOL
Oh wait, that's not how this works. Good to see fans are sill living in the honeymoon phase with Stevie
I don't see Svech ever becoming an important piece on this team, so it's irrelevant where he plays. Maybe he'll end up being a good bottom 6 player or a bad top 6 player on a bad team. Svech seems to have gotten the new mantle of other past Red Wings players who 'never got a chance', players like Jan Mursak and Jurco. Brendan Smith was never used properly, but he apparently sucks every where he goes.
I'm glad Yzerman is trying things, not sure I see why it would be better to play Svech just because of the principle. Yzerman didn't draft Svech, so not sure why he should care that some fans think Svech is owed something.
As for the Fabbri trade, I love it. Fabbri has a tremendous amount of talent and hopefully he can stay healthy and maximize on the opportunity.
Blows my mind that some folks are against this trade. Kind of feels like it’s just to be anti lol
It feels a little disingenuous to act like he's just your standard 23 year old prospect who's been playing in the AHL for a few years waiting for his shot and not mention that he missed the entirety of last season. Can you really blame the Red Wings if they want to be a little cautious with him this year?Dude. He's 23. He's been pro for 3-4 years now.
He's not a first-year pro.
So we agree,
Yzerman has moved on past Svech.
The difference is, you think that's OK.
I'm not there yet.
I don't see why we wouldn't give him a real shot?
What did we have it. to lose?
A shot at Erne? A shot at Perlini?
More opportunity for Taro ****ing Hirose?
If we'd given Svech the first 15 games of the season playing 12 minutes a night, and he sucked, I'd agree sending him back down to GR.
I don't have a problem with the Fabbri for DLR trade on value.
I don't have a problem with Fabbri.
I have an issue with Fabbri, Erne and Perlini, in succession.
Frankly, Erne and Perlini have been horse****. No skill. No value. I sure as hell hope that Fabbri bucks the trend.
For starters, we really need to stop referring to De La Rose as a "waiver pickup" and Fabbri as a "talented first round pick"What are you talking about? There is literally no way we couls lose this trade. We traded a 4th line waiver pickup for a young talented player that has had injury problems. If Fabbri doesnt turn out what exactly have we lost?
When do you think Blashill has a change of heart and starts playing DLR top 6 minutes and giving him chances to shine? At least with Fabbri we get another shot at a player to try to find some success with. DLR was going to be nothing but a 4th liner here whether you like to believe that or not.For starters, we really need to stop referring to De La Rose as a "waiver pickup" and Fabbri as a "talented first round pick"
Fabbri is 23.5 years old and was a #21 overall pick
De La Rose is 24 years old and was a #34 overall pick
How can we say only one of these players has potential to improve and the other has no future with the team?
For starters, we really need to stop referring to De La Rose as a "waiver pickup" and Fabbri as a "talented first round pick"
Fabbri is 23.5 years old and was a #21 overall pick
De La Rose is 24 years old and was a #34 overall pick
How can we say only one of these players has potential to improve and the other has no future with the team?
Yes, JDLR was a former second rounder whose best season produced 12 points. Fabbri in his first 123 games produced 29 goals and 37 assists. Last year, in his return from two major knee injuries, Fabbri still managed to score 3 fewer points in around 50% of the games as JDLR.
The point is, one player is a second round pick turned into 4th line fodder; the second player is a first round pick turned into a top 6 offensive player riddled with injuries. No matter what JDLR does, he has established himself as a reliable 4th liner. Something we have WAY too much of in the organization, and someone who probably is signing a deal with a new team after the season. Fabbri, if he can recapture half of the player he was is still a greater need for the Wings. The injuries are why he slowed down, the injuries are why he was available, the injuries are why JDLR was the cost. But the injuries could turn out to be a blessing in disguise for the Wings if he is physically able to bounce back.
DLR has 32 points in 195 career games.How can we say only one of these players has potential to improve and the other has no future with the team?
Is there any chance that a good defensive forward can get EVEN BETTER defensively?DLR has 32 points in 195 career games.
Fabbri had 37 points in 72 games in his rookie year.
It's clear which player has more potential upside.
For starters, we really need to stop referring to De La Rose as a "waiver pickup" and Fabbri as a "talented first round pick"
Fabbri is 23.5 years old and was a #21 overall pick
De La Rose is 24 years old and was a #34 overall pick
How can we say only one of these players has potential to improve and the other has no future with the team?
We added a guy that has 8 points in his last 51 NHL games.For a team that severely lacks scoring and any effing creativity it's amazing fans still find a way to complain about a trade that tries to help solve it.
I don't think you need to be embarrassed by that take. You weren't the only to feel that way that year. Just goes to show IMO though how silly it is how certain we get about our preferred draft choices. Forget just analyzing whether their skills will translate to the NHL, you can't predict an injury like Fabbri's. Also, I agree with your take on the trade!The guy I wanted over Dylan Larkin if Horvat didn't fall... So yeah I am happy guy and will admit that now embarrassing take.
Career has been derailed by injury. Hopefully he can get it going. But this is a skill trade. DLR has played well this year, I like him but dude cannot cash chances. Hopefully he does better in St. Louis, valuable depth player to a winning team hopefully that was wasted here. But I didn't hate watching him play, still a good move for us in my opinion.
There are a few posts in here along the lines of at least Yzerman made moves. The majority of the people praising the trade have actually stated WHY they like the trade. If you see that as blind loyalty to Yzerman, that's on you.And I don't agree with celebrating moves for the sake of moves that seems to go on around here. If we had another GM that had been around for a few years, and he made 3 trades that combined for a total of 21 games played, 0 points, and -11... those would be viewed as failures rather than celebrated