DitClapper
Registered User
- May 15, 2014
- 7,896
- 348
Lucic & Hamilton (1 year of Looch & Dougie soft as **** with low hockey sense)The Lucic deal was a foregone conclusion and we all knew it. He had to make that deal to get out of cap hell and avoid overpaying Lucic on his next deal. I give him credit for it for sure, but I wouldn't classify it as that hard of a deal. The "backlash" was minimal. And Hamilton put a gun to his head apparently, and he hardly got a king's ransom for him either. So yeah he made two meaningful deals there in a short time span. Three years ago. But again those weren't hockey trades to acquire players to improve his team...those were sales. There's a difference.
And the "not in the best interest of the team" argument is a fine one, but if he's not able to find a market where he can make deals in the short term to improve his team, then why the hell sign older players as UFA's and keep older defensemen over younger ones? At this point he has to know the trade market well enough right? He hasn't been closing any trades to improve his team, so why not turn his attention more to the future? Why sign Backes? Why keep Kevan over Colin? The strategy has to jive...that's the problem. And it doesn't. Unless the strategy is to revert to the 1970's-1990's model that Sinden built where the team is annually 1-2 pieces from contention. I seem to remember folks loved that.
The Lucic deal was a foregone conclusion and we all knew it. He had to make that deal to get out of cap hell and avoid overpaying Lucic on his next deal. I give him credit for it for sure, but I wouldn't classify it as that hard of a deal. The "backlash" was minimal. And Hamilton put a gun to his head apparently, and he hardly got a king's ransom for him either. So yeah he made two meaningful deals there in a short time span. Three years ago. But again those weren't hockey trades to acquire players to improve his team...those were sales. There's a difference.
And the "not in the best interest of the team" argument is a fine one, but if he's not able to find a market where he can make deals in the short term to improve his team, then why the hell sign older players as UFA's and keep older defensemen over younger ones? At this point he has to know the trade market well enough right? He hasn't been closing any trades to improve his team, so why not turn his attention more to the future? Why sign Backes? Why keep Kevan over Colin? The strategy has to jive...that's the problem. And it doesn't. Unless the strategy is to revert to the 1970's-1990's model that Sinden built where the team is annually 1-2 pieces from contention. I seem to remember folks loved that.
Lucic & Hamilton (1 year of Looch & Dougie soft as **** with low hockey sense)
Frederic
Lauzon
JFK
Kuraly
Zboril
C Miller
Zboril
Bwhahahaha
What a haul
Sweeney looks bad because 80% of the Bruins followers only know popular NHL players
I get it
I'm like this with the Celtics and NBA
Kovalchuk who quits on his team, could have cost them a number of assets as punishment from the league and comes back when he isn't going to make the money he thought in the KHL? 34 year old Ilya Kovalchuk who hasn't played in the league in 3 years? Who would cost you assets and a huge cap number? Pass
Would love Landeskog, Eberle would be OK, I think he would work with either Bergeron or Krecji, though the speed difference between Krecji and Everle could be an issue.
Sweeney has only been the GM since May 2015, so two years ago (not three) and he was only a month on the job when he made those trades. So, (to me anyway) I think it says something about his willingness to do what he thinks is in the best interest of the team. You can minimize it all you want, but there was quite a bit of backlash at the time and there are still people who haven't forgiven him for trading Looch.
Personally, I think they signed Backes because they thought he was a good player and would be a good mentor for the youngsters they had drafted, plain and simple. I thought the contract was at least a year too long. And I believe the team felt that Kevan is just a better player than Colin, now and in the long run. I'm not saying I agree, but when Cassidy came in and saw the same thing Clode did, that was it (same for Spooner I think).
I think Sweeney has a plan and if he can speed that up, he will, but only if it doesn't compromise his end game.
Or to look at it another way 7 suspect prospects vs a top 6 physical (on occasion) forward and a top 4 skilled offensive D who was very spotty in his own zone.
While they needed to restock the prospects, building through the draft has never been a Bruins specialty, so let's see where we are in 3 years. Today they are a worse team without Lucic and Hamilton.
I don't think you'd like Eberle
Here we go again.
Sweeney had the balls to trade arguably the most popular B's player in Lucic AND Hamilton in a matter of hours, so I don't see the "not capable" bs some have been spewing. The B's have the assets, so if DS doesn't make a particular deal, it's far more likely that he doesn't want to (because he doesn't believe it's in the best interest of the team), than it is him not being capable.
Yeah, I know, you like his drafting and development...
So do we get loads of Bruins action today or more blue balls?
Hoping something gets done.
Sung to the tune of Stevie Nicks:
I present the 2017 Bruins off season theme
Stand pat
Stand pat
In the middle of the pack (hockey purgatory)
It's alright
(It's alright)
Fans will buy the merchandise (and will still go to the games)
Fans continue to tune in
Whatever
Everyone should enjoy the weather and wit for the 18 th pick tomorrow
Okay, but the counter is this defence corps has been shy of key elements for what, three years now?
Sung to the tune of Stevie Nicks:
I present the 2017 Bruins off season theme
Stand pat
Stand pat
In the middle of the pack (hockey purgatory)
It's alright
(It's alright)
Fans will buy the merchandise (and will still go to the games)
Fans continue to tune in
Whatever
Only time this team made any type of conscious decision to win was when the building was pretty much empty and JJ inc. was starting to lose money. Years of lies and alibis were no longer working and they had to change direction, from "open the gates and allow the peasants in" to "we are trying to win, really".
They became tough again with Thornton and Lucic among others, signed high priced sought after free agents in Savard and Chara and did what was needed to put a contending, winning team on the ice.
Now the building is sold out, concession revenue is great and they are once again middle of the pack, win a round or two and be happy with it. Fool the fans with "prospects" who will lead the team to greatness and just be patient.
Shayne Stevenson, Rob Cimetta, Dmitri Kavaltanov, Evgeni Ryabchikov, Kevyn Adams, Shaone Morrisonn, Jonathan Aitken, the entire 2002 draft, Matt Lashoff, on and on and on. People wonder why I'm cynical about this class of prospects they currently have, take a look.
We'll see what happens this off season, I expect nothing. I'm happy one of the few players I like on the team didn't get picked by Vegas.
This should be required reading before anyone posts
Fantastic Joe
Or to look at it another way 7 suspect prospects vs a top 6 physical (on occasion) forward and a top 4 skilled offensive D who was very spotty in his own zone.
While they needed to restock the prospects, building through the draft has never been a Bruins specialty, so let's see where we are in 3 years. Today they are a worse team without Lucic and Hamilton.
This sums up Dougie Hamilton
http://awfulannouncing.com/nhl/sportsnet-broadcast-profane-dougie-hamilton-rant.html
Blue balls for us is my guess.
Good post
What is interesting is all 29 teams never missed a pick
Chicago went
3- Barker (bust)
7- Skille (bust )
1- Kane
3- Toews
But because they aren't Bruins I am pretending they were awesome