Pengwins
Registered User
- Jun 13, 2017
- 2,810
- 1,794
Sens are not going to want Sheehan in return for Brassard. So why would we trade Sheehan and for what? You aren’t making senseCan't have everything though.
Sens are not going to want Sheehan in return for Brassard. So why would we trade Sheehan and for what? You aren’t making senseCan't have everything though.
Why wouldn't they? He's a center and could replace Brassard for the remainder of the season. He's also on an expiring contract. TBH The Sens may prefer that.Sens are not going to want Sheehan in return for Brassard. So why would we trade Sheehan and for what? You aren’t making sense
Pageau strikes me as a player who is more of a typical 3C who occasionally goes on scoring tears.
Brassard is a guy who can legitimately play with and maximize Kessel.
**** off with the RHS faceoff PK bull****. We won 2 Cups with two LHS bottom six centers.
Bring a depth center in for that who can play wing if you’re that worried about it.
He would be a throw in not an asset the trade would be based on. So why would we throw him in?Why wouldn't they? He's a center and could replace Brassard for the remainder of the season. He's also on an expiring contract. TBH The Sens may prefer that.
He's not a throw in. You have to look at the cap and the term. OTT wants young and cheap assets. They'd also want someone who can play Brassards role if possible to aptly get through this season. I don't think the Pens would necessarily be clamoring for it, but OTT might.He would be a throw in not an asset the trade would be based on. So why would we throw him in?
If the Pens are unsuccessful in landing Brassard, then the second option should be Pageau. However, if the Sens move one and keep the other,then JR should be on the phone to St. Louis for any of their three supposed centers they are open to dealing...Sobotka, Berglund, or Barbashev. Berglund could fit well here with Hagy and Horny.
TBH I view him as more a winger.Sobotka could also be that gritty LW too.
Sure that’s fine and all but the next move would need to be better than acquiring LetestuHe's not a throw in. You have to look at the cap and the term. OTT wants young and cheap assets. They'd also want someone who can play Brassards role if possible to aptly get through this season. I don't think the Pens would necessarily be clamoring for it, but OTT might.
TBH I view him as more a winger.
Depends on the market. Would be perfect timing on our end, but takes two to tango etc,..We dont play again til next Friday. Could see a trade happening this week.
I'd love that, but not sure the Sens would.ZAR provides that Zack Smith-type of LW we wanted.
Sheary, Gustavsson, 1st for Brassard. Call up Sprong.
ZAR-Crosby-Sprong
Hagelin-Malkin-Hornqvist
Guentzel-Brassard-Kessel
Simon/Reaves-Sheahan-Rust
Yeah, it only cuts them 500k salary. We can all hope though.I'd love that, but not sure the Sens would.
So notwithstanding the fact that JR is probably just blowing smoke about being happy with Sheahan as 3c, is anyone else starting to think the Pens should upgrade the 4th line C and spend the real assets to upgrade over Sheary on the left side?
Our shits turn into pure gold.can we really be lucky enough to get ZAR and Simon as effective top 9 players? That would be what, 5 guys in the last three years with Sheary, Rust, and Guentzel. Even if it's just one of them, or if they can be solid 4th liners this year, that's pretty great for us.
Sit Reaves, play Rust there, put Simon in that LW spot imo. But either way yeah, that's solid. Not my plan A still, but very good.I don't even know what the Penguins should do at this point. Doing something like Sheary for Sobotka would be great, but should the Penguins trade Sheary? Hell, even Hunwick has been playing well recently. With their recent play, I'm moving away from making a big splash at the deadline. Just why mess with something that works?
Trade Hunwick, try and add a center like Plekanec and run with:
ZAR-Crosby-Guentzel
Hagelin-Malkin-Hornqvist
Rust-Plekanec-Kessel
Sheary-Sheahan-Reaves
I don't see any problems with this forward group. Sure, it's not as sexy as adding Brassard, but man, that forward depth is good.
Sit Reaves, play Rust there, put Simon in that LW spot imo. But either way yeah, that's solid. Not my plan A still, but very good.
I do too, but not as much as I like Simon or Rust as RW of a line with Sheahan and Sheary. Depends on the opponent a bit.Honestly, I like Reaves as the RW on a line with Sheahan and Sheary.