Don't like the sounds of this for the Rangers at all. He's going to cost more than he's worth twice - once to acquire and again to sign.
It's the duo that does it for me, too. Giving up a lot, paying a lot. I know we need a top RD and we (most likely) do not (yet) have that in our system. I also know I'm wearing... brown-colored glasses? Because we're always "in" on big names and so many haven't worked out that we're just all so thrilled to see them building a different way. So in that sense there's almost a bit of an over-compensation to go against the idea. But I'm still against it. At least for what I expect the cost would be in a trade. Please JD, don't make a "splash" move just to appease Dolan and his ruinous fantasies (I'm so happy his main toy is NBA).
I want Trouba. He really does help our D in a big way, we need that kind of guy. We also need another top center if we don't get Hughes. But moving out potential top prospects, a proven roster player like Skjei, Buch etc. AND a 1st (suggesting our own in this draft is laughable, though) or more? I'd much rather see what we've got, move some guys out, get some young guys in and then go from there.
I know guys like Trouba aren't available every year but this just isn't the year for us to be doing that kind of deal. Chasing Panarin? Sure. Moving out developing assets, our current position of strength, no. Not yet.