Yeah, he's really good. Been better than Lundqvist for over a year now, which is controversial to say, but true. That speaks both to his improvements and Lundqvist's decline.
I think Raanta could be a starting goalie in the NHL, I just don't think that's happening with the Rangers. I doubt they would ever bench Lundqvist in favor of Raanta, and if he keeps playing really well, I suspect he'll get a chance to play elsewhere before Lundqvist retires.
Who knows how many cups the Rangers would have won with Talbot or Raanta starting in the playoffs, and the window would be wide open for years to come with a younger goalie and this top offense.
the defense looks better when he plays.
no idea why or how, but as a unit, the defense looks less terrible when raanta plays.
its weird. but thats how it appears to me.
Seems to be the case with a lot of teams, tbh. Playing better in front of your backup isn't as uncommon as you might think.
the defense looks better when he plays.
no idea why or how, but as a unit, the defense looks less terrible when raanta plays.
its weird. but thats how it appears to me.
Most backups also get easier teams to play against.
ie. Winnipeg and not Chicago.
the defense looks better when he plays.
no idea why or how, but as a unit, the defense looks less terrible when raanta plays.
its weird. but thats how it appears to me.
Top-5 worst posts of all-time, I think.
A point that tends to come up a lot when discussing per 60 metrics is whether or not that player will continue to perform at that rate if given a bigger load to work with.
Do you think if Raanta was starting 60 games a season, he'd have a .932sv% Or do you think it'd be closer to his career average of .917? For the record, Lundqvist has only finished with a save percentage of .917 or worse twice in his career, and not since 08-09.
The funny thing is, it's likely that Lundqvist gets blown up tonight if he plays. Rangers are on a back-to-back. Travel from Winnipeg to Chicago. Have to go through immigration. Aren't playing on home ice. You can say this is 'excuses' or whatever you want, but it's probably pretty likely that the Rangers have roughly a 35% chance of winning tonight, and it'll be on the back of Hank if they do.
Most backups also get easier teams to play against.
ie. Winnipeg and not Chicago.
Your not accurate when it comes to the Rangers. Hank loves to pick and chose who he plays vs. and this season he has taken a bunch of easier games
Is this what you think, or do you have an inside source telling you that Hank is the one picking which games he plays in, and not AV?
If that's the case, I'd imagine Hank would want to play WPG and not CHI. Also, this seems to go against everything we know about Hank being ultra-competitive.
you have seen the hawks are missing 4 keys correct ? oh thats right i only pick on hank he never does anything wrong
Hasn't it been like that for years?!
The team plays better in front of the back-up, mainly because of Lundqvist's legacy. Him being the best goalie of the last decade almost, may just affect the play on a psychological level. À la "Hank will bail us out if we **** up" vs. "back-up in net, better be extra careful".
Was the same when Talbot was here.
Our backups have all been well rested and prepared by the most intelligent goalie coach of this generation, the psychology goes like this - teams see that Henke is not playing so they think it'll be far easier to score. Think again says Benny !
I'm not sure why this entered a personal level, as that's not something I intended. I was asking because you're vetted and have an inside base to this.
If this is something you know for a fact, then okay.
If this is a personal opinion, I'm inclined to disagree.