bsl
Registered User
- Oct 9, 2009
- 10,107
- 3,322
Yeah right. Great post.Dahlin for O'Reilly...you heard it hear first....,
Yeah right. Great post.Dahlin for O'Reilly...you heard it hear first....,
ROR might be on the way out of Buffalo, like any C available his name will be tied to MontrealWhat is this about? Just the opinion of Bobby Mac? Or an actual rumour?
What is this about? Just the opinion of Bobby Mac? Or an actual rumour?
Galchenyuk and our first. There, done.What do we trade in order to acquire ROR the first time he was traded? Go package up a deal that is better or equal to what the Sabres provided back when. Show us how easy that would of been?
O'reilly is a real first line center. But I agree, only go for him if we get Tavares and Dahlin.OReilly is getting slower, Im not sure its a good idea to trade for him unless you bring a real first line center like Tavares and Oreilly becomes your scond line center... that being said, I sure wouldnt overpay for this guy, no way we include our 2018 first round pick for him.. Galchenyuk straight up for him sounds fair deal to me..
O'Reilly is not a first line center, he is a fine 2nd on a good team...O'reilly is a real first line center. But I agree, only go for him if we get Tavares and Dahlin.
61 points on the worst team in the league and is elite defensively. Easily a number 1 center.O'Reilly is not a first line center, he is a fine 2nd on a good team...
He is playing about the whole 2 minutes on every PPs the Sabres get with Eichel and cie since the Sabres think they are a powerhouse like Pittsburg and while most NHL teams roll 2 PP units, so I would say his stats are slightly inflated but I can guarentee you that if Bergevin brings him in a first line center role, you will cry your life.. O'reilly hasnt the skills of a first line center, just watch him play a bit, its quite evident...61 points on the worst team in the league and is elite defensively. Easily a number 1 center.
No, but he's not your typical cliches hockey player who has no interests outside of hockey. Kinda of like Subban to be honest.
Only if there’s more to the plan than just RORJuulsen could and should be in the play if we're dealing for ROR. Buffalo is in desperate need of defensively sound dmen, Juulsen is that plus he's young and sorta expendable (not really unless it's for the right kinda deal but I think ROR is that). Obviously that's just one of the pieces that would go to Buffalo in that trade.
His average shift on the PP is 47sec, not sure what you are talking about.He is playing about the whole 2 minutes on every PPs the Sabres get with Eichel and cie since the Sabres think they are a powerhouse like Pittsburg and while most NHL teams roll 2 PP units, so I would say his stats are slightly inflated but I can guarentee you that if Bergevin brings him in a first line center role, you will cry your life.. O'reilly hasnt the skills of a first line center, just watch him play a bit, its quite evident...
Not sure it would be a good idea
High cap hit , declining , not a real number one more of a very good 2c
We have nothing that would interest the Sabres except our 2018 1st.
Gallagher, Beaulieu, pick. Or stack up any combination of our 'best' prospects: Mac, Scherbak, DLR, 1st rounder etc. It's not like Buffalo gave up a Lindros-esque ransom to get ROR. Surely we could have topped Grigs, Zadorov etc. if we so chose.What do we trade in order to acquire ROR the first time he was traded? Go package up a deal that is better or equal to what the Sabres provided back when. Show us how easy that would of been?
Skating. But yeah Chucky gets pretty underrated.......... Mostly by our organization...Between Galchenyuk and Drouin I’d rather keep Galchenyuk.
Is there an area Drouin is better than Galchenyuk? Maybe vision? But not by much.
Getting rid of your best prospect without getting back a legit top 6C is amateurish GMing.
Between Galchenyuk and Drouin I’d rather keep Galchenyuk.
Is there an area Drouin is better than Galchenyuk? Maybe vision? But not by much.
Getting rid of your best prospect without getting back a legit top 6C is amateurish GMing.
Juulsen could and should be in the play if we're dealing for ROR. Buffalo is in desperate need of defensively sound dmen, Juulsen is that plus he's young and sorta expendable (not really unless it's for the right kinda deal but I think ROR is that). Obviously that's just one of the pieces that would go to Buffalo in that trade.