She responded to me on Twitter and we went back and forth a few times. She didnt like it.
My last response was "He was on pace to score about 20 goals in a 82 gm season on 3rd line and led the Griffins in g's and got MVP of the playoffs."
Him maybe finding a spot on the 4th line is ridiculous. He should be on the 3rd line with out a doubt. If they dont like him then they need to trade him.
No 21-year old rookie is a lock for 3rd line at Red Wings. Period.
No 21-year old rookie is a lock for 3rd line at Red Wings. Period.
Well, taking into account the abundance of 4th line wingers on the roster and the team's need for scoring combined with Tatar's skill and style of play, this 22-year old rookie should be a lock for the 3rd line with the potential to move up the lineup. Semicolon ;
If I remember correctly, he got a fair amount of 2nd unit time in his callup. I'd expect more of that.The real thing with Tatar is he better be on one of the PP units, that is what I worry about.
Red Wings beat writers are total morons. It really is that simple.
She talks about "earning it." Brian Lashoff says hello.
If I remember correctly, he got a fair amount of 2nd unit time in his callup. I'd expect more of that.
Yeah, no reason he cant play wing on the 3rd line. Even if DET were to trade Emmerton, Tootoo, and Eaves.
Pav - Franzen - FA
Hank - Bert - Nyquist
Helm - Brunner - Tatar
Andersson - Miller - Abdelkader
Just curious why you have Bert, Brunner and Miller In the Center spots there all Wingers Just wondering why you have all four Centerman in the Wingers position.
I think the point is that no rookie is guaranteed any spot at all. They can play themselves there, but they're not handed anything. It's more of a semantic issue, but I think the Wings would agree with her.
He says hello, alright. From the press box. And only got called into action in the playoffs after injury. Then quickly removed.
I'm sure they'll give Tatar the same consideration.
I would hope for both Tatar and Nyquist on there. They have the chemistry. I suppose, like you said, it depends on who gets traded and who they sign. If nobody of particular impact is brought in, it's all the better for Tatar. I'm not sure the Wings like the idea of relying on him much, though.Hope so, but he and Nyquist will both be there fighting for that spot. So much of our lineup depends on the next couple weeks hard to tell today what that will mean.
Say they sign a Horton, however unlikely, but what does that do to the lineup. While fun a little hard to know what they are going to do. Aside from they make these kids earn their spot, that part is pretty clear in the past, so until camp Tatar isn't going to magically work his way up the lineup except in a lot of fans projections.
I think that guy had the lines in center-winger-winger -mode.
I think that guy had the lines in center-winger-winger -mode.
Nope. If UFA outsider will come, Tatar will be at 4th line. Just build the lines. There's too much bodies in front of him.
But the role will grow instantly after first injury. On paper, he starts from the 4th line. Just like Datsyuk did and his career was ruined because of it.
No prospect is handed a top role for free. They will take them being great.
You had a point with Smith, but I think you're wrong on Nyquist. He got a callup, ran with it, and put in an excellent playoff performance. That was good enough an audition.Most early projections have Nyquist in the top 6 in what would be his *GASP* first full season with Detroit. He showed flashes during the season and PO's, but nothing that screamed "here comes the next Selanne-type rookie season."
Yes, there are bodies in front of Tatar. Outside of a couple of the top 6 wingers, those bodies also lack Tatar's skill level, scoring ability, and willingness to consistently go to the net.
The Datsyuk rookie year thing is meaningless, as he was breaking into a team full of All-Stars and future HOF'ers. The 2013-2014 Red Wings... not so much.