What would the Bruins want back for Backes?
The Blues had the option of signing him to that contract before he left and they passed.I'd trade Backes to St.L for a pick if it were up to me.
I dont think he's useless by any means but I think we can find a vet to replace his leadership, grit, and points for way cheaper while allowing us to upgrade our D which we really need to do.
Brouwer for Backes+ Koko...?
I saw that after! Shucks. I figured koko wouldn't be a large add given he's still over in the KHL and I used to like him when the rumors of he being included in an iggy package were floating about.Brouwer was already turned down. Backes is a good player overpaid by a couple million. Brouwer is not a good player that could be replaced by a guy making the minimum. The 1.5 million in savings the Bruins would get wouldn't be enough for them to find someone better than Backes.
And you asked for a plus!
Backes was a solid player for Boston last year. Overpaid by a couple million. Weise might be overpaid by a couple million as well and isn't a solid player. I'm not sure if he is the same guy we remember from the end of his days in MTL. I'd want to know how the Bruins were going to spend the 3.65m in found money given their weakness was middle six scoring and you are moving out middle six scoring. 3.65m is obviously not enough money to bring back Rick Nash or get Kovi. So what are you really gaining here?
If you can move out Backes ENTIRE cap hit, or take back a guy on an expiring deal I'm all over it.
Backes has a 3 million dollar bonus this year and 3 million in salary. If you pay the bonus this year, can you find a team that wants Backes at 3m, 4m and 4m in real $ (6 million in cap) that will take the whole deal? Its not crazy if they are not a cap team.
If Bruins suddenly have 6 million in more cap space, it opens up a lot.
Weise is only making a couple of million, $2.35 m to be exact, and his contract expires in 2020. I thought he would be a neutral part of the deal and offered a 2nd rather than the 3rd that was mentioned by at least one person earlier in the thread.
Backes is starting down the slope of injured a lot, no way a team should want him unless Bruins retain a fair amount.
Unless they aren’t a cap team, once the Bruins pay his bonus on 7/1, Backes is 11 million over 3 years in actual money.
Yet it happens over and over again. Why? I guess GM's trying to keep their jobs and start doing dumb things.Another team shopping their overpriced UFA signing just a couple years into the deal. Color me shocked.
I don't know if that's true. The last two years, it's been 'medical' issues that have kept him out of most of the games he's missed, not actual hockey related injuries.Backes is starting down the slope of injured a lot, no way a team should want him unless Bruins retain a fair amount.
The Blues had the option of signing him to that contract before he left and they passed.
Seems pretty unlikely they're going to trade a pick to take on that contract now, especially since what should have been the two best years of the deal are already done.
Rask isn't going anywhere, when you don't have depth in the system, bobby, even for short term injury relief....With both having NMC can't see anything happening from the Bruins brace. So one more cup run with them and next year the Bruins let loose. Start with Rask.
Is Backes a 'pay to go away' situation?
https://www.tsn.ca/nhl/video/insider-trading-tavares-focused-on-negotiations-with-islanders~1417629
In discussing the Bruins interest in Ilya Kobalchuk, Darren Dreger says there is interest in David Krejci and that the Bruins would also like to deal David Backes.
Kreicji is soo smart and an elite playmaker IMO but hes played 1 complete season in the last 9. I wouldnt touch him.
Backes can probably be moved at the deadline but no point in trading for him now