Is Backes a 'pay to go away' situation?
When will Gm’s learn not to hand out these contracts. Lucic, Backes, Ladd, Eriksson everyone on these boards called them bad contracts. This is the reason that posters think they could do a better job. They might actually be able to.
Backes for Perry + ? What kind of plus would it take?
Both with 3 years left, Ducks would save about $10M in salary and get a guy who could fill in for Kesler this season.
Bruins could light a fire under Perry if he finds the right linemates; if not, don't see him getting any worst, really. Plus, amp up the hate having both Marchand + Perry on the team
Backes for Perry + ? What kind of plus would it take?
Both with 3 years left, Ducks would save about $10M in salary and get a guy who could fill in for Kesler this season.
Bruins could light a fire under Perry if he finds the right linemates; if not, don't see him getting any worst, really. Plus, amp up the hate having both Marchand + Perry on the team
Is Backes a 'pay to go away' situation?
Honestly if you can balance the money it shouldnt take any plus at all imho. Im one of backes biggest supporters but he cant crack our top two lines and 6 mill is too much for any 3rd liner.
Meanwhile, perry fits the profile of the type of guy we want with krejci.
If anaheim ate the difference in cap hit id ok the swap
Nah, I’d say Steen is a better player right now.Backes for Steen?
I'd imagine Jarmo is kicking the tires of these two. Backes would easily be the cheaper of the two.
What would Boston want in return for either player?
Carolina wants to get tougher and Boston will need a backup, if Backes' head isn't scrambled, Boston pays this coming year's bonus so Backes is paid less real dollars:
Darling + 2nd for Backes
Boston saves nearly 2 million in cap, Carolina saves almost 5 million in actual dollars, pick is sent Boston's way because Backes is actually serviceable
I would love to have Krejci centering our 2nd line behind Hischier... What are the Bruins looking for?
Honestly if you can balance the money it shouldnt take any plus at all imho. Im one of backes biggest supporters but he cant crack our top two lines and 6 mill is too much for any 3rd liner.
Meanwhile, perry fits the profile of the type of guy we want with krejci.
If anaheim ate the difference in cap hit id ok the swap
Anaheim does care more about salary than cap, but if they retained enough on Perry to make the deal even at $6M cap each, that means they only save 708K per season. Not sure that is enough for them to pull the trigger.
Maybe the deal should be ecpanded
Perry (1.25 mill retained leaving him at 7 cap hit)
Henrique (at 4 mill for 1 year)
For
Backes
Kevan miller (2.5 for 2 years right shot dman)
Boston gets a short term center depth they need as their kids get ahl experience. Get that big body right wing they always want.
Move out an extra right hand shot dman they dont really need when they already have mcavoy, carlo, mcquaid. Losing that 2.5 mill cap hit for 2019-20 when mcavoy, heinen, donato are due raises is important. Backes is only owed 8 mill cash his final 2 seasons. So getting henrique off the books this year and then backes instead of perry next 2 years... does add up for anaheims owners
Meanwhile im assuming anaheim might be moving on from bieska? If so, miller can be a useful short term replacement
In my opinion, no. I think it has more to do with the potential addition of Kovalchuk/Rick Nash and the up and coming prospects the Bruins have. Cassidy preferred to play Backes at RW because the Bruins lacked size at that position. If the Bruins do add Kovalchuk, who brings some size and scoring, they would have Pastrnak, Kovalchuk (Sweeney said they are trying to sell him on playing RW), and Backes at RW in the top 9. The problem is, the Bruins have a bunch of young NHL-ready players, and Backes would be holding a top 9 roster spot over one of them. Backes, especially given his cap hit, would be a waste playing on the 4th line as well as any of the prospects that would be battling for a top 9 W position.Is Backes a 'pay to go away' situation?
From the sound of things, it only sounds like the Bruins are considering moving Backes while teams are interested in Krejci, doesn't mean the Bruins will move him.Backes and Krejci both still contribute when healthy, why exactly are the Bruins considering moving them or is it all cap related?
Backes and Krejci both still contribute when healthy, why exactly are the Bruins considering moving them or is it all cap related?
Carolina has zero interest in moving Staal unless you can send back another center who can shut down top lines every night while putting up 50ish points a year doing it. Krejci/Backes are not those guys. And we're especially not trading him just to get rid of Darling.Carolina is a possibility for krejci as he lives in that neck of the woods. Maybe backes would waive too?
Coming back we would need a center... someone that could float between second and third line depending how our kids develop. The guy i see is jordan staal
Staal is signed longer but a lower cap hit than krejci.
Id take darling too
Krecji and backes 3 year contract each 13.25 mill
For
Staal and darling with their 10.15 cap hit next 3 years
Carolina gets a huge boost to their locker room and culture change. Boston hopes darling reverts to chicago form once hes back on a winning team as a backup.
If carolina wanted one of mcquaid or miller for even more leadership/culture im sure one of them could be added at very little cost. Maybe carolina retains a bit of cap hit?
I actually am suddenly liking the idea of staal on boston... hes the guy im looking at if hanifin is too expensive to get
Krejci or Backes is a complete non-starter for just one of them. Nevermind both...There's gonna be a whooooooole lot of additions coming from Boston in a deal like that