- Apr 30, 2010
- 25,393
- 15,535
I admittedly hate change. But I really hate those seats.
They're slightly narrower, so they can cram about 400 more seats into the arena. With an average ticket price of $152 last year, 400 seats a game for 43 games (41 RS + 2 preseason) = an extra $2.6 million in seat revenue. That's all you need to understand.
I admittedly hate change. But I really hate those seats.
@Kate08
They are banking on the next generation of fans to be less obese, and 25 years from now when they do it again who knows
The Garden is going to exist until 2070 and then
@Kate08
They are banking on the next generation of fans to be less obese, and 25 years from now when they do it again who knows
The Garden is going to exist until 2070 and then
Putting on my tin foil hat for a minute...along with the seat renovations, I think they're eventually expanding the balcony concourse on the 301 side, correct? So, let's do the math. Seats are getting more cramped. Concourse is getting bigger. So, what are people going to do during a 17 minute intermission when they feel all claustrophobic in their cramped seats?
I don't see them lowering the prices simply because more people are coming in. They've managed to (allegedly) sell 17,565 seats per game for, what, almost 10 years now? Say what you will, but there's a supply shortage. When you sell an arena out regularly, there's a good chance that you can raise the price by some amount without emptying out seats. Equivalently, you can add more seats and still charge the old price.
Yes, and let's not talk about the ridiculous players salaries. Because you know... what's the point.I'm all fine with trying to get more seats in the house. I'm just not fine with the fact that the prices for anything won't change.
I get it's a business, but Jacobs bends fans over the barrel with his ticket and concession prices to begin with. Adding more seats and keeping the prices the same is just maddening when he makes the kind of money he does.
But we all will still go so I'll just leave it at that.
The resellers/scalpers/speculators are just as much to blame.I'm all fine with trying to get more seats in the house. I'm just not fine with the fact that the prices for anything won't change.
I get it's a business, but Jacobs bends fans over the barrel with his ticket and concession prices to begin with. Adding more seats and keeping the prices the same is just maddening when he makes the kind of money he does.
But we all will still go so I'll just leave it at that.
we’ve always had extra room between our seats. I don’t know why, but there was a 3ish inch gap between seat 1 and seat 2 in our row. That’s going to make the transition even harder for us.
We went into this season saying we’d renew and see how the “new view” is (moving back 3 rows). If the seats are that uncomfortable, it will probably factor into our decision on wherever we renew or not. I don’t see the point of paying that much money to be u comfortable 20-40 nights a year.
Imagine this:
Bruins ownership will be installing wider and more comfortable seats for its fans. All seats will have new cushions and cupholders at every seat so fans can spread out a bit more and enjoy the game experience. Also, concessions prices will be dropped substantially so families can afford to attend the games. Instead of $6.00 for a soda that costs us .25 we will be selling them for $2 so we sell a lot more of them and still make a tidy profit and we still stop gouging our loyal customers. Thank you Bruins fans for being so loyal and selling out the stadium for the last 400 or so games.
It depends on when you go the Bruins/Blackhawks tickets where going for 25$ in the Snowstorm last season.The resellers/scalpers/speculators are just as much to blame.
That’s the kind of exception that proves the rule.It depends on when you go the Bruins/Blackhawks tickets where going for 25$ in the Snowstorm last season.
That’s the kind of exception that proves the rule.
TBH, I'm not sure I could have sold the entire set of 44 games for all that much over face value, on average. That's what you have to measure - not individual games. Granted, there are always wild cards - for example, say Ovi gets injured a week before he comes here, or the ever popular snowstorms. Or on the other hand, unexpected bonuses, like a game where the Patriots celebrate the Super Bowl, or a milestone game.
That said, when you add in STH bonuses, and the savings of even one round of the playoffs (much less four rounds including a game 7 SCF), there is room for scalpers (and regular STHs who want to sell a handful of games instead of split them in their group) to make a tiny bit of money. Obviously, the Bruins are trying to stop that - not for altruistic reasons, but because they want the money for themselves.
but because they want the money for themselves.
What does Columbus charge for tickets? How about the non traditional hockey markets? Detroit? These teams all pay players big salaries but don't gouge like JJ has his whole time as owner in Boston. Jacobs has been, and always will be, a throw back to the old school owners, the Norris', Ballard, Arthur and Bill Wirtz.How else are teams going to pay $7million+ for players?