missingmika
Registered User
- Dec 9, 2006
- 4,521
- 1,831
No, i haven't. But we are now in different times and it will be Hollywood movie.
So they will fight but then bond over that their moms have the same name and defeat the main enemy?
No, i haven't. But we are now in different times and it will be Hollywood movie.
So they will fight but then bond over that their moms have the same name and defeat the main enemy?
Also remixed/arranged from the originals:
Is it weird that the fact that they've chosen to remain faithful to the iconic music is filling me with a lot of hope for this movie? Changing up the score would be one of the easiest things to do if they went in with a "we can do this better than Japan" mindset.
I think the first one showed they really cared for the character and subject material to trust them.
The monster stuff in that movie they nailed. The issue with the first movie was they switched leads with the human characters from an interesting Bryan Cranston to a boring army guy in his son.
A little more monster action and a human story focused on Cranston and Wantabe and that movie is a perfect kaiju movie.
The first one wasn't that bad. And I get, to an extent, why there was so little monster action. It wasn't about that. If you've ever watched the original 1954 Godzilla, it's about the same balance of 75% human activity and 25% kaiju action. I realize some of that was out of necessity for the difficulty and expense of doing suitmation (which at that point was basically uncharted territory in movie-making), but it was also meant to build up the dread and treat Godzilla as less of a giant monster to be fought and more a natural disaster/force of nature (which is a little more explicit in the Japanese cut since the US one with Raymond Burr culled all the nuclear horror allegory because it was too boring/executives didn't want to confront post WWII audiences with the reminder that a city/country being nuked in the course of the war was an ungodly horrible thing to happen)
My comment wasn't so much directed at the previous movie. It was more at the fact that this was a new crew making a bigger, popcorn-ier sequel that would be ripe for those sorts of "we can make it better" alterations, along with the fact that it's a new crew behind it, and coupled with the general result of a lot of disappointing cross-cultural adaptations from different franchises.
I really liked the first one. It just could have been better, but I thought the actual Godzilla stuff showed the care for the material.
Why I have a lot of faith in this one. If Avengers wasn’t hogging so many screens still and nothing good being on the reserve seating I would go see it tonight.
They seem to get what makes these movies work and why Godzilla is awesome.
Seeing it on Sunday and I can't wait. I lost most of my respect for critics after they panned The Orville.
Well, the public gave it an 88% on Rotten Tomatoes. I think you're right, though, critics dont have a clue how to rate a monster movie. They want top-notch acting and story writing while all I want to see is some killer CGI and monsters beat the shit out of each other. Seems like the majority of the public agrees with me.IMAX is the way to go if you have one near you. I have no clue what a critic looks for in a monster movie, just unreal action.
Seeing it on Sunday and I can't wait. I lost most of my respect for critics after they panned The Orville.
The Orville's first season deserved some panning. It got better towards the end but not everything was great.