Chojin
Tiny Panger...
- Apr 6, 2011
- 4,301
- 573
Haha, looking at the trade board gave me idea that maybe the Blues just did this to screw over the Jets. While inadvisable, it would be hilarious.
Last edited:
I'm just saying in terms of making the cap work. Petro's contact expires, and Faulk's extension is the exact same. If Faulk wasn't here, then you'd just need to free up about 3 million for Petro. Now with Faulk's extension in place, we'll have to find a bit more to make Petro's deal work.no.... Because Petro's 6.5 is coming off the books. I cannot imagine the Blues giving up on the ONLY captain to lead you to a cup, They have to have a plan, and I would guess they talked to Petro's camp before all this went down. Petro will have a statue in front of the building someday, I am willing to bet on it
Why are people saying he is replacing Petro? IF Petro leaves Parayko is Petro's replacement.. I could see Army flip Faulk and possible other pieces to get a young top 4 LHD. Any LHD heavy teams out there?
Now seeing from Canes folks that he hasn't. I may be misremembering. ???He actually can and has played both side. Played a lot of left side last year as Canes were so stacked on right.
Now seeing from Canes folks that he hasn't. I may be misremembering. ???
I think you are right. Seems maybe they played together and I was misremembering who was on which side.pesce did
Now seeing from Canes folks that he hasn't. I may be misremembering. ???
I think you are right. Seems maybe they played together and I was misremembering who was on which side.
I don't think he was acquired to dangle to Seattle. But if we resign Petro and subsequently lose Faulk to expansion draft, I don't think that is terrible outcome. It's not as if we would have essentially lost Bokk to expansion. We would have used Bokk to rent Faulk for 2 years, which would be of great value to a contender.Put me in the confused group. IF he is being taken as a carrot to dangle for Seattle, then I'm not sure I'm happy paying Bokk for the privilege. While our PP certainly needed a boost, I'm not a fan of having too many mostly offensive D around and Dunn already fits that bill pretty well. We know moving Eddy was rumored for awhile, but tough to figure out why this was the deal they went for. They must see good value in Faulk, and maybe didn't wanna miss the chance to lock him up. Still, I am gonna need some time to figure this one out.
He's going to have to learn quick. He may not be deployed on his off-side the first half of the year, but I can't imagine a scenario in which we don't enter the playoffs with a plan of playing Parayko/Petro 24min+ each.
Worked pretty well last time. If I had to pick our one competitive advantage throughout the playoffs, it's the fact that one of those two monsters were on the ice 80% of the time. Even with the addition of Faulk, I can't imagine they'd opt to spread the wealth in dire circumstances.
I'm good with the price to pay to acquire him.
I'm so-so on the extension.
I'm terrified of what this means for Pietrangelo.
Yeah, it definitely feels similar.Remember when the Blues signed Tyler Bozak and everyone thought that spelled the end of the ROR-discussions...and then Army acquired ROR?
Well, everyone now thinks there's no room for Petro...