BlueOil
"well-informed"
- Apr 28, 2010
- 7,028
- 4,023
is faulk gonna play his on his off side? i'm puzzled by the defensive layout now
He actually can and has played both side. Played a lot of left side last year as Canes were so stacked on right.
You and me both.I'm good with the price to pay to acquire him.
I'm so-so on the extension.
I'm terrified of what this means for Pietrangelo.
is faulk gonna play his on his off side? i'm puzzled by the defensive layout now
This certainly gives them a few options and the ability to hedge over his contract demands. That said I think they find a way to get him signed as well.What the hell just happened? The only way this makes sense is if we think Petro isn’t going to stay.
That said we are ****ing stacked defensively this year.
I think it's a lot more indicative of where contracts are going... especially for PM RD.6.5 for Faulk is a pretty bad deal in general.
Can we start an official petition to Doug Armstrong requesting Petro be resigned.I just don't like the feeling that this is Petro's last year in the Blue Note.
stacked on the right and only okay on the left thereDunn-Petro
Bouw-Colt
Carl-Faulk
Bort
Has to be the most likely setup.
So.... how are we going to fit this all under the cap? Is there another trade incoming or are we going to run 2 extra players max?
With expansion draft, wouldn't this force us to protect 4 dmen if Petro does return?
I think it's a lot more indicative of where contracts are going... especially for PM RD.
Of course that's if we re-sign Petro. If he is an UFA then we don't have to protect him right?They'd probably just protect Petro, Parayko, and Dunn. If you lose Faulk, it's not the end of the world.