Reading old posts this strike me most.That's kind of a silly reason though. Just because they play him doesnt mean he's playing great. Given the investment, he's going to play. There is a middle ground between he's terrible and he's "ok". I've watched the majority of games and for the most part....he's ok, which isnt ok for a guy who's soon to make 6.5m for the next 7yrs as a Blue. If Faulk was set to be a UFA...I doubt too many people would give much of a crap. There are aspects of Faulks game that I do like....but it's not enough to offset what he's going to make.
So true.