Garbage Goal
Registered User
- Apr 1, 2009
- 22,699
- 4,591
Every player should just go with an insanely high ask no reasonable person would give in arbitration because they'll just split the difference for the most part anyway.
I'm not so sure. There's pretty much not a d-man in the league who is more thrown to the wolves than Ceci. What we know is that he's nowhere near able to be effective in those minutes, but that doesn't mean that he wouldn't look vastly different playing next to a Gardiner, for example. That would be a better neutral zone player than he's used to, and easier minutes than he's pretty much ever got.uhhhhhhhhh
ceci is worse than all our RD
He's 8th in the league in EV + PK time over the last two years.
He has had far and away the highest QoC on our team.
Why talk about a player that you know nothing about?
Why do I keep seeing this silliness? You know they can trade him if they don't want to keep him at 4.3mil, right? He would easily be flipped for a nice piece.
jesus lolBruce Garrioch reporting the Sens are going to walk away from it.
Not true according to TwitterBruce Garrioch reporting the Sens are going to walk away from it.
That’s more on josi than anyone. He signed for term before he fully established his offensive game. Got security but had he done bridge deal he likely earns around $10 million more over those 7 years of his contract.Cody Ceci makes more money than Roman Josi lmao
They better hurry. Under 48 hours to find someone to trade him to now.
Bruce Garrioch reporting the Sens are going to walk away from it.
Well, no.... they can easily accept the reward and then trade him any time after. Nice try though.
Bruce Garrioch (@SunGarrioch) | Twitter
Where?
I don't think I'd be optimistic. at best, he'd be a passable bottom pairing guy. That isn't worth 4+ million.I'm not so sure. There's pretty much not a d-man in the league who is more thrown to the wolves than Ceci. What we know is that he's nowhere near able to be effective in those minutes, but that doesn't mean that he wouldn't look vastly different playing next to a Gardiner, for example. That would be a better neutral zone player than he's used to, and easier minutes than he's pretty much ever got.
Not that I'm actually arguing to acquire him, it's just that extreme situations like his can be hard to judge.
Me neither. There are better gambles to take.I don't think I'd be optimistic. at best, he'd be a passable bottom pairing guy. That isn't worth 4+ million
I would walk away if I were the Sens