I will. The ridiculous deal he gave to Elvis made it necessary to move Korpi for peanuts. I believe Gavy was responsible for most of the return on this trade.
Last edited:
Confirmed with Link: CBJ trade Gavrikov and Korpisalo to LA for ‘23 1st (conditional), ‘24 3rd And Quick
- Thread starter Seachd
- Start date
Beat me to it…good summary of the draft for 1st round.
I think rounds 2-7 are based strictly on points…
Gary Bettman did something positive for the CBJ? Preposterous!
focking auto-correct!Beat me to it…good summary of the draft for 1st round.
I think rounds 2-7 are based strictly on points…
Gary Bettman did something positive for the CBJ? Preposterous!
I figured you meant Gavy, just had to have a little fun with that.
mouser
Business of Hockey
Random thought that occurred to me:
If Columbus can't find a taker for Quick at 50% discount, perhaps Quick would be amenable to a mutual termination of the contract, allowing him to sign wherever he wants at a lower cap hit?
Columbus wouldn't get an asset back in return, but would save around $600k in cash and generate some goodwill with Quick (again assuming he's interested in that option). Also some "unofficial goodwill" for Columbus with whichever team signs him.
MissADD
Registered User
not listening to the live twitter thing but apparently they had jeff rimer on it (presumably right after explaining to him that twitter is like the radio now) and apparently he said that chychrun's dad (who works for the panthers) told him that jakob would welcome a trade to columbus (according to a tweet i saw)
Low key hope they somehow manage to bring Korpi back on a good contract 
Just always seemed like a great team guy and seems to be back on his A-game after getting his hips fixed. But if he gets regular playing time with the LAK and continues to do well, I'm sure there'll be plenty of takers in the summer.
Just always seemed like a great team guy and seems to be back on his A-game after getting his hips fixed. But if he gets regular playing time with the LAK and continues to do well, I'm sure there'll be plenty of takers in the summer.
Crede777
Deputized
- Dec 16, 2009
- 14,653
- 4,205
That was previously speculated. If true, one thing I like about Jarmo as a GM is that he has a dollar figure and term in mind for every player based on their value and won't go above it. I know it may rub players the wrong way, especially ones who expect to get paid more just to hang around in Columbus, but with the reality of the salary cap you really can't afford to overpay players.
That said, there's certain player valuations I disagree with him on. For instance, Erik Gudbranson.
Jovavic
Gaslight Object Project
He could also not report like Greg Campbell and the team would suspend him.
If they mutually agree, Quick would have to clear waivers first.
CBJWerenski8
Formerly CBJWennberg10 (RIP Kivi)
- Jun 13, 2009
- 42,422
- 24,357
CBJWerenski8
Formerly CBJWennberg10 (RIP Kivi)
- Jun 13, 2009
- 42,422
- 24,357
I wonder why the team was willing to give 4 years to 30 year old Gudbranson but wouldn’t give 6 (I presume?) to 26 year old Gavrikov
Yes I am aware Gudbranson was a UFA but you’re negotiating with Gavrikov to prevent him from being one so it’s basically the same thing.
mouser
Business of Hockey
Yeah, if they did want to agree to terminate he'd have to be on waivers tomorrow to clear before the trade deadline.
If Weekes says it, it’s definitely going to happen, he’s probably the most tuned in former player in the media
Curious if the split is 3/4 vs 6/7? I thought, if they extended him, it'd be for 5 years.
Perhaps it's more than just term and Gavrikov wants to test the market this summer as well.
MissADD
Registered User
Maybe he wanted 8 years. That length would bring him to the end of career most likely. I know Gudbranson got 4 years because that is what was happening last year, those type of d-men got in the neighborhood of a 4x4.
CBJWerenski8
Formerly CBJWennberg10 (RIP Kivi)
- Jun 13, 2009
- 42,422
- 24,357
If Gavrikov wanted 8, which I severely doubt but I’ll play into it, then yeah trading him is the right call.
If it was 6, I probably would have gave it to him
Its almost the Anderson thing all over again. We know by the end we will probably be glad it didnt happen but it still sucks. Atleast this time we got a 1st out of it
I suspect that after Gubranson they did not want to give out other long term contracts because they have spent so much draft capital on defensemen who could be in the NHL within 3 years.
KJ Dangler
Registered User
Lark
From the comments that Jarmo made when he signed Gud , they needed that mean , nasty defenseman that would not allow teams to stand in front of our goalie . Gavrikov is solid , but he’s not overly physical … in all honesty , I’m sure with all the defenseman coming , they don’t want to be tied to Gav for more than a few yrs max
Fro
Cheatin on CBJ w TBL
He's fine behind the net...smart...not an overly risk taker
Byrral
Registered User
So Jarmo trades a couple players for a late first and some around here are already claiming he's redeemed himself. Guess what.....this team still sucks, is still in last place, is still terrible at developing prospects, is still a terribly constructed roster and the goalie he acquired is not an asset that will help this team get better in the future. But that late first will surely save this team along with all the other youth that he's prematurely added to the NHL roster. It's gonna take a lot of moves between now and the beginning of 2023-24 season to re-construct this roster and give the team a "chance" to win every night.
Yet you want Jarmo to continue to do this? Brick by brick since 2013.
Good luck to Gavy and Korpi in LA. Even though I personally think they are both just "serviceable" players they both always gave everything they had for the team and I admire that.
Yet you want Jarmo to continue to do this? Brick by brick since 2013.
Good luck to Gavy and Korpi in LA. Even though I personally think they are both just "serviceable" players they both always gave everything they had for the team and I admire that.
