CycloneSweep
Registered User
- Sep 27, 2017
- 48,309
- 40,101
A Rangers who beat a defense that good might be super excited to play against our attempt at a defense.That's a good thing. A 0-4 Rangers might've been real desperate.
A Rangers who beat a defense that good might be super excited to play against our attempt at a defense.That's a good thing. A 0-4 Rangers might've been real desperate.
Alright, Friday night. Looking forward to having some beers and watch NHL hockey tonight.
Oof cant even stomach the mains right now....Oilers blood is in the water and all the haters are out.
Shooting 53% (only about triple what the average star player shoots at). Somehow -1 despite having 12 points in 5 games. Yeah....lol @ All the Leaf reporters jerking off in unison to Auston being closer to Gretzky than McDavid
LOL @ using +/- to judge the league' s laedsing scorer.Shooting 53% (only about triple what the average star player shoots at). Somehow -1 despite having 12 points in 5 games. Yeah....
LOL @ using +/- to judge the league' s laedsing scorer.
LOL @ using +/- to judge the league' s laedsing scorer.
They allowed less goals last season than the cup champs and Tampa FYI. And that was over 82 games, not 5.LOL @ that defense. 1st in the league in scoring, bottom 5 in Goals Against.
What's the matter with that? Edmonton fans post daily on the Leafs board.Lol at leaf fans having to scour other teams boards to get sour at Matthews getting a slight criticism
You’ve played 5 powder puffs non-playoff teams and are averaging like 5 GA per gameThey allowed less goals last season than the cup champs and Tampa FYI. And that was over 82 games, not 5.
You’ve played 5 powder puffs non-playoff teams and are averaging like 5 GA per game
Not a recipe for success
What's the matter with that? Edmonton fans post daily on the Leafs board.
What's the matter with that? Edmonton fans post daily on the Leafs board.
Lol at using a 5 game sample to judge a leading scorer. I don't actually value +/- much at all but it is kind of funny that a guy leading the league in scoring is somehow a minus. Are you lost?LOL @ using +/- to judge the league' s laedsing scorer.
Have you seen his horrendous posts on the main board before?Lol at using a 5 game sample to judge a leading scorer. I don't actually value +/- much at all but it is kind of funny that a guy leading the league in scoring is somehow a minus. Are you lost?
I've tried to stay off this site and the mainboards in general a lot the past couple months, but I can imagine. I'm sure its much like the Matthews vs. McDavid thread we saw last season 10 games in where it was being proclaimed that Matthews would be proven better by season end when he had unsustainable individual and on-ice shooting %. Weird how that didn't materialize. Feeling some serious de ja vu.Have you seen his horrendous posts on the main board?
Unfortunate, wonder why his suspension stuck.