Duckspeak-meaning "to quack like a duck". excerpt from 1984, Appendix, The Principles of Newspeak, page 241-251: ... What was required, above all for political purposes, was short clipped words of unmistakable meaning which could be uttered rapidly and which roused the minimum of echoes in the speaker's mind.
What are the current mask rules in NJ, PA and MD?
It seems like DE has one of the most strict face mask policies around.
Don't look at prices of power 9 and such. You won't be happy. That's the "mom threw out my baseball cards" of that generation of kids.
I play Vintage, which is the only thing that still allows Moxen, Time Walk, etc. Almost no one plays it. I just got lucky that I still have it all. They probably play Commander, which can be done cheaply or expensively. But even the cheap decks can be very good.
Don't even worry about it. Unless you've got one of a few specific Thornton RCs in there, it's not worth the time to dig through. It would have been in a case of some sort as they were always the most valuable things in the set.
Asterisk championship...yay....so philly.
When we head up to Canada for card hunting on this newly proposed YouTube channel funded by my soon to be lottery win, we're headed your way.Because I'm feeling too good about myself today, I'll exhume my story about having successfully collected the 1979-80 O-Pee-Chee series, including a Wayne Gretzky rookie card. I was so proud of having finally gotten an entire set that I Scotch-taped the whole set into a binder. What's worse, I can't even find the card anymore.
I can't even find the card anymore
I can't even find the card anymore
I did have a second one that my best friend gave me in a box of his cards just before he moved to Saudi Arabia. About 5 years ago, he visited from Australia and I gave it back to him, with instructions to take very good care of it. I hope he cashed in!
Re: MTG, my wife and I started playing during the betas. I can't believe I bought her a Shivan Dragon ($20) for her birthday back then. Recently, I sold 6 dual lands and a couple of minor cards for $1000. They were played so not full value but still, $1000 in my pocket vs them sitting in a shoebox in the rec room.
And the default assumed interaction of someone calling your dog over isn't kidnapping. What the hell are we doing here?
"The media" is not one entity out to get everyone. They cover news. Like every other public-facing profession, there are those that are good at their jobs and there are those that appeal to the lowest common denominator. There's no need to lump the former in with the latter. In Flyers terms, not everyone is Carchidi and if you're treating them all that way, it speaks to your character and no one else's.
The sad matter is that the media largely have become agents of polarity. Yes, this goes back as far as the first "official" scroll of goings-on and so many states have established their propaganda vehicles, but I would love to hear just facts without obvious agendas. CNN sharpened that stick as the first 24-hour infotainment entity and then Fox jumped the shark in the opposite direction. It makes me sad as a holder of a journalism degree.
When we head up to Canada for card hunting on this newly proposed YouTube channel funded by my soon to be lottery win, we're headed your way.
Guy is still unwilling to admit it was a shitty cash grab movie that general audience didn’t want.
Guy is still unwilling to admit it was a shitty cash grab movie that general audience didn’t want.
The sad matter is that the media largely have become agents of polarity. Yes, this goes back as far as the first "official" scroll of goings-on and so many states have established their propaganda vehicles, but I would love to hear just facts without obvious agendas. CNN sharpened that stick as the first 24-hour infotainment entity and then Fox jumped the shark in the opposite direction. It makes me sad as a holder of a journalism degree.
Left ...right ...blah blah blah. News organizations are corporate entities that serve narrow interests and frame the political discourse typically on wedge issues of race, religion, gender, guns, sexuality etc. It rarely addresses class and power structures in any honest or meaningful way....There is a tendency to see opposites as equivalents, both media outlets and the talkings heads format.
However, you have to separate opinion from reporting facts.
Outside of Chris Wallace, Fox News has no news, it's purely a polemic (actually that's charitable, Hannity for example, isn't coherent enough to engage in polemic). It is not just that they're biased, there's an almost complete disregard for the truth, making them more like a video tabloid than a news network.
CNN has drifted leftward, but is still far more centralist than credited, it's just as Fox has moved to Brietbart land that what was once considered "moderate" has been labeled "leftist."
MSNBC is to the left of CNN, but even they have a far greater respect for "facts" than Fox News.
Remember, Joe Scarborough was a Republican Congressman from the Panhandle of Florida, and Nicole Wallace was the press secretary for Jeb Bush and Director of Media Affairs for the Bush Administration, and that's on your "left wing" cable network.
However, all cable channels have a tendency toward opinion and hyperbole to keep the attention of their viewers.
The print media is pretty balanced, once you ignore the editorial pages and opinion pieces, which are designed to be, well, opinions.
The biggest difference between the NY Times and Wash Post and the WSJ is where news stories are placed in the paper (and that their are fewer stories and in-depth reporting in the WSJ since their reporting staff was slashed by Murdoch), not the content of stories. A story that is bad news for the administration might be page 1 on the NYT and Post, but page 4 in the WSJ and south of the fold. But all three "elite" papers have similar readers, who aren't interested in polemics in their news (since they're making decisions off that news and value accuracy) - they resort to the editorial/opinions to have their prejudices stoked.
Magazines like the Atlantic and New Yorker have high journalistic standards for their leading stories (the Rolling Stone a bit less), because their economics are highly dependent on their reputation (and in the age of the internet, glaring errors are quickly reported).
You just have to use a little common sense when reading the news.
I highly recommend this video. The movie was obviously awful but this does a good job of breaking down why it was so horrible.
Left ...right ...blah blah blah. News organizations are corporate entities that serve narrow interests and frame the political discourse typically on wedge issues of race, religion, gender, guns, sexuality etc. It rarely addresses class and power structures in any honest or meaningful way....
Yeah, at least it looks like they put some effort put into it.The new one is likely going to suck too but at least it kind of forged it’s own path some with some new (main) characters.
This is a toe take, go to your room.Yeah, at least it looks like they put some effort put into it.
Honestly, I didn't really care for the original (watched it for the first time like a year or two ago) so I'm not too interested in the franchise regardless, but at least it's not a near close of the first movie, made by people who clearly don't understand what made the first one so popular.
I'm not saying it's a bad movie, but the special effects are so outdated that it just got too distracting for me.This is a toe take, go to your room.