- Sep 28, 2014
- 76,783
- 123,390
Virtanen + Tanev for Gostisbehere ??
My dads a Canucks fan. Not my idea. I told him I would say no. Thoughts?
Virtanen is useless for us and Ghost > Tanev so thats an easy no.
Virtanen + Tanev for Gostisbehere ??
My dads a Canucks fan. Not my idea. I told him I would say no. Thoughts?
Virtanen + Tanev for Gostisbehere ??
My dads a Canucks fan. Not my idea. I told him I would say no. Thoughts?
Some fans will always focus on the negative when it comes to MacDonald but I think he's never been that terrible player they want to make you believe. He's just mediocre. He has his good games and he has his bad games like any mediocre player.
Hahah that’s what I said. Canucks fans over value their garbage.Ask him if he would give up Boeser for Laughton + Gudas.
How about a pick for Boyle and send Varone to AHL. Raffl Vorobyev BoyleLaughton + a pick for Virtanen might be interesting.
Laughton + a pick for Virtanen might be interesting.
Laughton + a pick for Virtanen might be interesting.
I don’t think Laughton is invaluable at anything, but I’d trust your opinion on avoiding that trade.laughton is invaluable on the pk, and is a great swiss army guy. Virtanen has that pedigree but I don't really like his game away from the puck.
I don’t think Laughton is invaluable at anything, but I’d trust your opinion on avoiding that trade.
I think Laughton is the definition of a replaceable part. But if you think he’s more valuable to the team than Virtanen, I don’t have enough grasp on them to argue.we have coots and giroux who are usually paired together that pk that are capable of skating the puck out of the zone and taking faceoffs. The only player on our pk that is capable of both is laughton, and personally id prefer if giroux and coots minutes were displaced by more ev and pp time.
he's been fantastic during this winning streak. Really taken to his role as a pk specialist and a bit of an agitatorThe Flyers need more Scott Laughton types on their 3rd/4th lines, not less.
I think Laughton is the definition of a replaceable part. But if you think he’s more valuable to the team than Virtanen, I don’t have enough grasp on them to argue.
I think he is trying to fill role he’s not good enough at. But I could be wrong.replaceable, of course. Would i spend good money to keep him here, no. But on this roster with the dearth of good skaters and responsible defensive abilities he is a guy that is quietly important .
I don’t like Laughton & would be willing to trade him for a chance.
You have made t clear you don't like him. And just like Lindblom, you can't see the good in them.I don’t like Laughton & would be willing to trade him for a chance.
No, I’ve supported Laughton as 4lLWYou have made t clear you don't like him. And just like Lindblom, you can't see the good in them.
Laughton on the 4th line LW is where I want him next year. Gives us a good PKer who can add some points, move up in the lineup if needed, move to C in needed(injuries).