Almost exactly $9M adjusted for an $85M cap, although that was after they won the Hawks first Cup too. I don't know if we can make predictions based on that but we at least shouldn't be at all surprised if it is in that range. You have to go all the way back to 2005-06 to see this much scoring in the league when we had seven NHL players with 100p or more and two with over 120. It will be interesting to see if owners can put any down-force on player demands to be paid as though a ppg now is the same as a ppg four or five years ago. Is that even an actual negotiating point when they don't actually want to get paid as little as players were getting just one year ago?
That's what I figured.....roughly $9 million equivalent. Which sounds very fair to me. And with scoring up this year, plus having the mutual benefit of Tavares and Marner together, could we see a cap hit adjusted slightly downwards due to the increased scoring league wide, plus having an 84 point scorer for his C? I love Marner, but don't get me wrong....playing with Tavares is helping his numbers every bit as much as they are helping Tavares' numbers.
I don't know how this will all play out in the end, but there are going to be issues to be discussed as the previous scoring markers seem to be not applicable this year, IMO.
Another fly in this ointment is that Rantanen in Colorado is coming up for renewal too. He's leading the league in scoring after putting up an 84 point second season least year. I am almost hoping that his gets settled first, so you will have a definite ceiling on Marner's price....in fact, based on productioin, it should be significantly lower than Rantanen. Best thing for the Leafs would be a great deal signed in season by Rantanen.