16thOverallSaveUs
Danila Yurov Fan Club Executive Assistant
- May 2, 2018
- 18,789
- 11,750
I may have misinterpreted, but the "get him some games this year" part seemed to involve Torch wringing his hands over a possible flight to the KHL. I'm not sure how seriously he meant it in regards to Khovanov, but there was a lot of "why play in the AHL waiting for a call-up when you can make $1m-$2m over in Russia?" Doesn't seem like it's really something to worry about here, but it's interesting to hear it from a guy that's been over there (briefly).That would be really fun
It sounded more like it has to do with making a million bucks a year in the KHL vs making 150k in the AHLIf the player has already come over to the CHL, I don't see them fleeing to the KHL unless they perceive that they don't have much of a shot at the NHL for the foreseeable future. If he thinks he deserves a spot in the NHL without playing any AHL time, then it smacks of entitlement and delusion. The AHL is a very good league that humbles a lot of NCAA and CHL prospects.
How much do Russians stars and non stars make in the KHL if converted to USD?It sounded more like it has to do with making a million bucks a year in the KHL vs making 150k in the AHL
Maybe it’s just confidence in his ability. One of the things I loved about Erik Haula was that he was cocky all the time. Life is a mindset, never forget that.If the player has already come over to the CHL, I don't see them fleeing to the KHL unless they perceive that they don't have much of a shot at the NHL for the foreseeable future. If he thinks he deserves a spot in the NHL without playing any AHL time, then it smacks of entitlement and delusion. The AHL is a very good league that humbles a lot of NCAA and CHL prospects.
He's likely to get some AHL games after Moncton though.I doubt We’re still playing past Moncton
Pretty sure he can sign with the KHL as they don’t operate under a transfer agreement with the NHLKhovanov is already under contract for the Wild. He can't sign in the KHL until his ELC is over, or terminated (which would be a dumb move by MN). The only thing he can do is play for the Russian national team in tournaments.
They don't have a transfer agreement, but respect each others contracts. That's why we couldn't sign Kap.Pretty sure he can sign with the KHL as they don’t operate under a transfer agreement with the NHL
It comes down to the player respecting the contract. Kaprizov could play here currently theoretically. Look at Kovalchuk. He left with 13 years remaining on his dealThey don't have a transfer agreement, but respect each others contracts. That's why we couldn't sign Kap.
He had to submit his retirement papers to the NHL to do so.It comes down to the player respecting the contract. Kaprizov could play here currently theoretically. Look at Kovalchuk. He left with 13 years remaining on his deal
Do you have to retire if you’ve never played a game?He had to submit his retirement papers to the NHL to do so.
That voids the contract with the NHL, allowing the KHL to sign him.
You don't think Khovanov is going to submit retirement papers, do you?
In the end, he chose the lower pay route of the CHL vs going up into the KHL already. I don't think he's concerned about an AHL stop between. That's why he already signed his ELC with the Wild in the first place.
He has a contract that will have him playing either with the Minnesota or Iowa Wild. That contract is what both the NHL and KHL agreed to respect with the lack of transfers.Do you have to retire if you’ve never played a game?
It comes down to the player respecting the contract. Kaprizov could play here currently theoretically. Look at Kovalchuk. He left with 13 years remaining on his deal
Yep, that story was addressed over here by Mike Russo. At first, incorrectly, but he eventually elaborated and said that Khovanov, who is under contract with the Wild, wishes to be loaned to a Ak Bars Kazan. The agreement between the NHL and KHL to not poach players who are under contract already from one another is the reason a deal isn't signed, yet. I don't see why the Wild would say no to that, unless they actually do want to use him in the NHL next year, or even this summer. I would personally expect him to need a bit more development time, so lending him to a KHL team would be a good thing in my eyes.Now, there are reports in Russia about a two-year contract for Khovanov in Ak Bars Kazan, but nothing is signed yet. See
Yeah, but the message indicates it should be a two-year deal, not one-year. But it is not done yet.Yep, that story was addressed over here by Mike Russo. At first, incorrectly, but he eventually elaborated and said that Khovanov, who is under contract with the Wild, wishes to be loaned to a Ak Bars Kazan. The agreement between the NHL and KHL to not poach players who are under contract already from one another is the reason a deal isn't signed, yet. I don't see why the Wild would say no to that, unless they actually do want to use him in the NHL next year, or even this summer. I would personally expect him to need a bit more development time, so lending him to a KHL team would be a good thing in my eyes.
If it's a loan, the Wild could call him back at any time if they want him in the NHL.Yeah, but the message indicates it should be a two-year deal, not one-year. But it is not done yet.
It is not how it works among the KHL & the NHL.If it's a loan, the Wild could call him back at any time if they want him in the NHL.
His NHL contract takes priority and the Wild would have to agree to loan him in any scenario.
I get what you're saying, but I don't think any of us here can speak in an educated manner on how this would work. He's under contract in the NHL, and there is an agreement in place between the NHL and KHL to honor each other's contracts, even if that is basically just a hand shake deal, rather than a legally binding document. There is no transfer agreement, so there is no way the Wild could force Ak Bars Kazan to send Khovanov back until their season is over, so I think you're right about that part. If he plays in the KHL, it's for the full season. As for how many years he'd be loaned... if he's wanting to be loaned for 2 years, that may be why the Wild haven't agreed. I'm reasonably sure they'd be ok (but not happy) with loaning him for a single year, but I'm pretty sure he's in the Wild's plans moving forwards from there.Yeah, but the message indicates it should be a two-year deal, not one-year. But it is not done yet.
Ugh. How did we ever get in such a mess?
Except that's exactly what happened with Kravtsov this past season.It is not how it works among the KHL & the NHL.
That is exactly how it works with anyone who already has an NHL contract.It is not how it works among the KHL & the NHL.