IafrateOvie34
Registered User
- May 14, 2009
- 11,980
- 8,763
not a fan of this one.........someone had to go but 85 wouldn't have been my first choice
This, there is other fat this team could have trimmed.
not a fan of this one.........someone had to go but 85 wouldn't have been my first choice
who? Ward? Erat? No other other teams would take those contracts.This, there is other fat this team could have trimmed.
This team is better with Wilson and Latta on it than MattyP.
I like MP, but this move make the team better. Your bottom line guys need to be defensively responsible or bangers, MP was neither.
And who cares about the return? Traded a 6th rounder for a 4th rounder, seems ok to me.
who? Ward? Erat? No other other teams would take those contracts.
You make some calls...see who would take who. Ducks would take Perreault. You make it.
When has Boudreau or Hunter or Oates ever used Perreault as a left wing? It simply wasn't in the cards for him. Hell, Oates used Volpatti, Hendricks, and an ice cold Chimera on the top line without giving Perreault a shot there.MP could slot on any of line and even play a little wing.
The Hawks had guys like Frolik and Kruger in their bottom six. The Bruins had Ryder, Seguin, and Peverley. Not every player in on a lower line has to be a grinder. Having scoring depth and guys who can carry play are positive things.I watched the Bruins and the Hawks just win SC's with this outdated mode of thinking.
who? Ward? Erat? No other other teams would take those contracts.
You make some calls...see who would take who. Ducks would take Perreault. You make it.
this is precisely why this move was made.Yeah I'm not losing sleep over it. I rather see this team be tougher to compete against. MattyP may have heart, but he will get destroyed in the reformed Patrick division.
Yeah I'm not losing sleep over it. I rather see this team be tougher to compete against. MattyP may have heart, but he will get destroyed in the reformed Patrick division.
Let's call it like it is. McPhee was forced to dump MP85. More inept asset management, but it's not like its a franchise killer. Just another feather of accomplishment for GMGM....
Wait what's going on around here? Caps traded a mega tweener 160 pound bottom 6 player who was in the way if they wanted to keep up a prospect like Tom Wilson and half the board freaks out?
Who cares what the got for Perrault. He is a useless player for any team that aspires to actually go deep in the playoffs. Let's be reality.
Lots of NHL caliber skill, but 85 is a fools gold NHL player. IMO.
I sort of get it...they want to get harder to play against. It's just that their longstanding concept of the term seems pretty stale and hasn't really tended to apply to their drafted players outside of Ovechkin, Alzner & Wilson. There's a reason why McPhee needed to have an epiphany in order to prioritize a player like Wilson. Many of their other first rounders still in the lineup are in a lot of ways the exact opposite of hard to play against beyond their raw skill level.Every specific decision can be justified on some sort of grounds, but in totality it's random motion, or more exactly -- continuous and often undisciplined reactions to immediate circumstances, rather than a strong vision of what the team needs and how to build towards it, while squeezing the most out of what is available.
Right. I like Perreault, and I'll miss him from a quirks/personality standpoint, but the biggest issue is this is a conscious decision to make the bottom 6 worse for the sake of carrying that 23rd man (it seems). That just can't be justified.