He did request a trade in 2016.He’s never publicly asked for a trade to my knowledge. Sure, he hasn’t been willing to sign long term, but we don’t know the specifics on what’s been offered. You have a link to these requests?
Canuck's first will be top 3.
So ya, there's no reason for either team to do this. Horrible, bad, not well thought out proposal.
Have you ever been to the West coast or the East coast?Listen everyone west of Toronto is the west coast everything east is the east coast. Any questions?
Tanev for niku + 2nd
Have you ever been to the West coast or the East coast?
Well you're entitled to your opinion, but the Jets wouldn't touch this trade. A contending team is not going to trade half of their top pairing for a downgrade on defense and a chance at a player who may help them in 3 or 4 years.Honestly, it's not even a downgrade plus you potentially get the 1st overall pick! It is an awful proposal and the Jets would be insane not to take this if it were offered. I might quick being a Canucks fan if it did.
OK, I know it's only preseason but he scored 2 goals last night equalling Tanev's goal production for all of last season. IMO just a hint of what's to come from the kid.So Jets give up the cheap cost controlled player for a more expensive one? Yeah that makes sense with Winnipeg being in cap hell.
Exactly.A hockey trade that makes zero sense for either team
I think people are undervaluing the Canucks 1st. This deal is worse for them imo
Why would either team do this?
If the next negotiation with Trouba/Overhart proves difficult (again) Chevy should threaten to trade him to Ottawa. Montreal or Vancouver.Yeah like Trouba would leave a cup contending team like Winnipeg, For a cellar dweller in Vancouver.
Wouldn't shock me, If this scenario doesn't really happen. If Trouba doesn't commit long term with Winnipeg.If the next negotiation with Trouba/Overhart proves difficult (again) Chevy should threaten to trade him to Ottawa. Montreal or Vancouver.
I wouldn't do that from Vancouver's side, from Winnipeg's side I think it depends on the signing outlook on Trouba - Winnipeg is ready to contend so there's value in being better now and dealing him to Van might help to keep Van's pick from being as high
probably no from both sides, from the Canuck's perspective - don't cut corners, just rebuild and keep your picks. Benning has been doing very well with his draft picks so I don't know why you'd want to take what could be a really good one away from him
well, one more year of being really bad could give the Canucks what looks like a formidable young core along the lines of what Winnipeg and Toronto have built. I think a Hughes/Cozens/Kakko level prospect in addition to what you already have should be enough for a solid core, plus there should be cap space to bring in UFA talent - this last year's free agency I think was just getting human shields for the kids, he overpaid for them but really think that's of little consequence in the grand schemeAgree that we have to keep the pick. As for Benning, his drafting is the only sliver of light that his tenure has brought and even then he really missed on the Virtanen and Juolevi picks. JB is the hockey version of the drunken 2-step. 1 step forward at the draft making a pick, millions of steps back when July 1st hits or he makes a trade.