Sterling Archer
Registered User
- Sep 26, 2006
- 22,997
- 13,473
My bad on the last part. But still think your being overdramatic about Bergevin’s legacy being tied to trading for Ekholm.I think you need to read again
My bad on the last part. But still think your being overdramatic about Bergevin’s legacy being tied to trading for Ekholm.I think you need to read again
That's a terrible return for Ekholm.
3rd round pick
Luke Glendenning
Artturi Lehkonen
Will Butcher
1st round pick
Ryan Poehling
Ben Chiarot
Mattias Ekholm
3rd round pick
Toffoli Kotkaniemi Gallagher
Drouin Suzuki Anderson
Tatar Danault Armia
Byron Glendenning Perry
Evans
Ekholm Weber
Edmundson Petry
Butcher Romanov
Mete
I’d do it. Elkhound isn’t a star but we can’t afford one anyway. He’d improve our blueline so much.1st + mete for ekholm, lets go
Ekholm - Weber
Ed - Petry
Chiarot - Romanov
Kulak
What!? Evans is very good at what he does. He’s deadly on the PK by his tenacious forecheck and same goes at 5V5. He also creates a lot of chances for a 4th line, gives many good hits + pacing for 20 points with 10-12 min/game.
What more do you expect? I wouldn’t trade for a 5% upgrade in the dot over everything stated above. Give me the young hungry guy that wants to prove himself rather than trading a 3rd round pick for a 35yo guy ‘good on faceoffs’.
just my .02 cents
Hampus Lindholm and Derek Grant in Anaheim might be the actual perfect fit for the Habs.
Guhle is probably enticing to them since they have his brother there.
And Lindholm is a bandaid who's out for a month and a half.The only problem with Grant is that he’s under contract for this year and the next 2 seasons
So Ekholm is the 2021 Trade Deadline target we all exhaustively talk about to be disappointed?
Maybe but Lindholm is freaking stud so I’m all in on him. I just doubt he’s really available and if he is, he will cost an arm and a legAnd Lindholm is a bandaid who's out for a month and a half.
He's good but definitely not a stud imo. He's a solid 2nd pairing guy when not injuredMaybe but Lindholm is freaking stud so I’m all in on him. I just doubt he’s really available and if he is, he will cost an arm and a leg
If you’re honest, how many time did you see him play ? Because he’s clearly a 1st pair guy and he would be our best D. He’s one of the best in the league defensively, a real minutes eater, really good in transition and can put numbers. The only reason where not talking about him kore is because he’s playing in Anaheim.He's good but definitely not a stud imo. He's a solid 2nd pairing guy when not injured
I’d do it. Elkhound isn’t a star but we can’t afford one anyway. He’d improve our blueline so much.
A dozen full games at best.If you’re honest, how many time did you see him play ? Because he’s clearly a 1st pair guy and he would be our best D. He’s one of the best in the league defensively, a real minutes eater, really good in transition and can put numbers. The only reason where not talking about him kore is because he’s playing in Anaheim.
Who is this mysterious Elkhound?!
He's never been awesomeHampus Lindholm is awesome. Not sure why someone would say differently. Only issue is you can count on him missing around 15 games a season.
I’d rather go for Cam Fowler who would likely be cheaper because he doesn’t really fit with the Ducks rebuild plans and he provides more offence.
would suck to lose Guhle but big fan of Hampus Lindholm but his he even available hes still just 26/27Hampus Lindholm and Derek Grant in Anaheim might be the actual perfect fit for the Habs.
Guhle is probably enticing to them since they have his brother there.
He's never been awesome
Yes he would be our best D, Weber is not at Lindholm level anymore even if I think a presence like Hampus would help a lot Weber.A dozen full games at best.
He plays 22 minutes a night when healthy and he absolutely would not be our best defensemen, that's absurd. He's solid, not a gamer changer by any means and never has been.
Yesterday a guy said he'd give up a 1st, Guhle, Edmundson and Mete. That's absolutely ridiculous and borderline grounds for calling his family to check on him.
If he signed an extension because he only has 1 year left, I'd do a deal if the price was right but not absurd. He could play with Weber on that pairing and be fine.
Hampus Lindholm is awesome. Not sure why someone would say differently. Only issue is you can count on him missing around 15 games a season.
I’d rather go for Cam Fowler who would likely be cheaper because he doesn’t really fit with the Ducks rebuild plans and he provides more offence.
Lindholm is one of the better defensive d-men in the league. He’d be our best guy defensively by far. He is definitely a top pairing D, just not a 1st PP unit guy, which is why his TOI is a little lower.He's good but definitely not a stud imo. He's a solid 2nd pairing guy when not injured
Yes he would be our best D, Weber is not at Lindholm level anymore even if I think a presence like Hampus would help a lot Weber.