FlabJack
Registered User
- Dec 30, 2012
- 34
- 15
Would you rather see the Sens getting a good prospect and a first for Duchene/Stone or two good prospects?
Say for example if the Sens traded either Stone or Duchene to the Jets would you rather take
Vesalainen+Niku or
2019 or 2020 1st + Niku?
Not saying these are feasible deals in terms of value, but the idea itself is the point here: what would be of more value to the team, a pick and a prospect or two prospects that have already started to show what kind of development track they are on? Is the first round pick necessary or would it be better to dip in another teams prospect pool?
If the Sens get two good prospects rather than a good prospect and a late round first would that be preferable to you?
Say for example if the Sens traded either Stone or Duchene to the Jets would you rather take
Vesalainen+Niku or
2019 or 2020 1st + Niku?
Not saying these are feasible deals in terms of value, but the idea itself is the point here: what would be of more value to the team, a pick and a prospect or two prospects that have already started to show what kind of development track they are on? Is the first round pick necessary or would it be better to dip in another teams prospect pool?
If the Sens get two good prospects rather than a good prospect and a late round first would that be preferable to you?