Micklebot
Moderator
- Apr 27, 2010
- 53,940
- 31,145
The second Dman on his PP unit was usually Souray or Goglioski (39% of the time each).Benn had much much less PP time. Total PP time plays a big role in how many PP points you put up.
He also had Trevor Daley and ? instead of Robidas and Goligoski on the PP.
Here are there primary PP pairings,
STEPHANE ROBIDAS ALEX GOLIGOSKI 31.28%
TREVOR DALEY ALEX GOLIGOSKI 15.72%
TREVOR DALEY SHELDON SOURAY 13.19%
STEPHANE ROBIDAS SHELDON SOURAY 10.23%
That represents over 70% of the Teams PP TOI
Spezza spent more of his ice time with Greening than Benn did with Ott. Just because Spezza's linemates were more consistant doesn't make them better.Ott was Benn's #1.
Benn on the other hand spent about the same amount of time with Ott (51%), Eriksson(47%) and Ryder (47%). Daily (35%) was on about the same as Robidas (31%) and Souray (29% these two were usually together) and followed by Goglioski at 28%. Unlike Ottawa, Dalas had depth at offensive defencemen.
Butler was with Spezza about 20% of his ES time. Not insignificant., but again, more consistant line mates isn't necessarily better line mates.Michalek was Spezza #1. He hardly played with Butler at all. It was pretty much Greening - Spezza - Michalek the whole season.
Refer back to my point about Depth on D. Otherwise, I've admitted Spezza benefits from Karlsson.Spezza also had Erik Karlsson as a top linemate, which you conveniently forget. It's like having an extra 1st line winger. Seems like you conveniently forget a lot of things.
Finally, Benn's Pts/ice time > Spezza's.
That's fair, but I still contest your argument about better line mates.