Spooner st
Registered User
- Jan 14, 2007
- 12,944
- 8,100
It would certainly be a more aggressive move I'd be ok with.At a certain point don't you have to think that keeping Krejci at age 33-34 is going to cost you both Krug and Johansson and both are 28ish years old?
I've gone back and forth on who to trade, but after seeing the poor return for Trouba, I'd try to keep Krug.
Moving Krejci to keep Krug is making more and more sense. Krejci had a productive and healthy year but there is no guarantee that occurs next year (or the following season). His trade value is decent but if the Bruins keep him and he doesn't perform well, then you've got $13+ million in bad contracts for 2 years in Krejci and Backes.
What's best for the team long term comes first.