It seems pretty likely to me that he is in the bottom 100 of canucks with n games played, where n is however many games he's played.
Are you suggesting he is bottom 100 for players who have played less than or equal to N (28) games?
Or are you suggesting the very narrow definition of N (being number of games or 28) specifically?
If it is specifically N, he might be the only one who has played only 28 games specifically (???), so OK...
But if you are saying he would be in the bottom 100 for players who have played LESS than let's say 50 games. No chance!!!!!
LOL
All good, but let's be honest. He has not brought a lot to the table as of yet. He has played here as a ho hum 4th line looking player that can be found in all kinds of ways, but this does not come close to making him one of the worst 100 players to play as a Canuck. There have been so many absolutely horrible hockey players who have dressed for this franchise over the years... Really really bad hockey players. This guy isn't close to as bad as them.