The Management Thread | Live, Play, Repeat Edition

Status
Not open for further replies.

SeawaterOnIce

Bald is back in style.
Sponsor
Aug 28, 2011
15,958
19,206
I expect no changes. Everyone please just deal with this reality . The Family is not going to pay people to stay at home.

The Family was one of the owners that did not want to play the season in the first place.

Exactly. They deferred improvements for Rogers Arena back in 2019. Let go of the entire Titans due to costs. The Aquilinis are saving at all costs. The plan is to just ride it out and get through the next year.

Honestly wouldn't surprise me to see an internal cap get put in place preventing any UFA signings or RFA extensions.
 

Intangibos

High-End Intangibos
Apr 5, 2010
7,807
3,370
Burnaby
Starting to really think Aquillini is just going to ride out this season to save money and doesn't care about the outcome of the season with no fans. Team is just an investment to him, nothing more. Benning might be here to stay

No, that's not the case. Aquilini isn't even a penny pincher. He's what happens if CDC/Reddit/Twitter/whatever casual fan base gets their own hockey team and decides to take an active role.

Everyone is looking for explanations with ownership like "oh he's stupid" or "oh he's cheap" when the reality is he's just a fan who doesn't spend tons of time analyzing and discussing hockey. That's usually fine, but it's very concerning when they have an active role in determining the future for this team.

The media has treated this management group with kid gloves for their entire tenure, now their knives are out and little casual fan Frankie will probably take notice.
 

Pastor Of Muppetz

Registered User
Oct 1, 2017
26,179
16,061
Whether or not Benning stays in the executive booth for the rest of the season, the owners have to take away the keys to the car. The last thing this team needs is Benning making changes in the middle of the season.

They have to limp through to the end of the season and then review the organization from top to bottom.
This is what I think happens.
 

Svencouver

Registered User
Apr 8, 2015
5,252
9,960
Vancouver
No, that's not the case. Aquilini isn't even a penny pincher. He's what happens if CDC/Reddit/Twitter/whatever casual fan base gets their own hockey team and decides to take an active role.

Everyone is looking for explanations with ownership like "oh he's stupid" or "oh he's cheap" when the reality is he's just a fan who doesn't spend tons of time analyzing and discussing hockey. That's usually fine, but it's very concerning when they have an active role in determining the future for this team.

The media has treated this management group with kid gloves for their entire tenure, now their knives are out and little casual fan Frankie will probably take notice.
I can't imagine how a fan of this team in any capacity could let this go on without any changes for much longer
 
  • Like
Reactions: Seattle Totems

Intangibos

High-End Intangibos
Apr 5, 2010
7,807
3,370
Burnaby
I can't imagine how a fan of this team in any capacity could let this go on without any changes for much longer

I can understand that, but I think the truth is what neither of us can understand how the average Vancouver fan for the past 7 years has been overwhelmingly supportive of this regime. It's just, with typical Canuck luck, ownership falls into the "average Canuck fan" group.
 

Peen

Rejoicing in a Benning-free world
Oct 6, 2013
30,082
25,583
Limping through the season is stupid because we need to make sure we make something of the season.

You need a smart GM to sell rentals, clear cancers, and acquire players that teams don’t want to expose and lose for nothing.

There is always time to be an opportunist. Why waste it by letting the muck sit around and the negativity fester? Just stupid.
 

Dab

Registered User
Apr 17, 2017
3,193
3,001
No, that's not the case. Aquilini isn't even a penny pincher. He's what happens if CDC/Reddit/Twitter/whatever casual fan base gets their own hockey team and decides to take an active role.

Everyone is looking for explanations with ownership like "oh he's stupid" or "oh he's cheap" when the reality is he's just a fan who doesn't spend tons of time analyzing and discussing hockey. That's usually fine, but it's very concerning when they have an active role in determining the future for this team.

The media has treated this management group with kid gloves for their entire tenure, now their knives are out and little casual fan Frankie will probably take notice.
I know from personal experience that on a construction site the Aquilini’s stay completely out of the day to day operations but when shit hits the fan one of them is around all the time.
 

hookshott

Registered User
Dec 13, 2016
568
365
Limping through the season is stupid because we need to make sure we make something of the season.

You need a smart GM to sell rentals, clear cancers, and acquire players that teams don’t want to expose and lose for nothing.

There is always time to be an opportunist. Why waste it by letting the muck sit around and the negativity fester? Just stupid.
You hire a President and let them deal with a new GM and coach in the off-season while guiding the ship safely and providing the players some hope for the future
 

tantalum

Hope for the best. Expect the worst
Sponsor
Apr 2, 2002
25,123
13,967
Missouri
People understand that firing an executive or coach in the NHL = sending them home with full pay until their contract runs out (or they are given permission to take a new job) correct? They remain canuck employees but without responsibilities.

It’s not like a few more months of double salary GM and Assistant GM positions is a huge deal.
 

Icebreakers

Registered User
Apr 29, 2011
9,329
4,244
Limping through the season is stupid because we need to make sure we make something of the season.

You need a smart GM to sell rentals, clear cancers, and acquire players that teams don’t want to expose and lose for nothing.

There is always time to be an opportunist. Why waste it by letting the muck sit around and the negativity fester? Just stupid.

This is mostly true but most of our pieces that we would want to move are immovable. Regardless of GM. Unless if the guy wants to do hockey trades IE trade Miller/Schmidt.
 

Peen

Rejoicing in a Benning-free world
Oct 6, 2013
30,082
25,583
You hire a President and let them deal with a new GM and coach in the off-season while guiding the ship safely and providing the players some hope for the future
It’s so funny to me that the only president who’s realistically available in a pinch that wouldn’t be a downgrade on our current front office is Gillis.

It’ll never happen. But they basically need a Gillis-like individual with 25% less cockiness and less of a bad relationship with owners and half the fanbase who hates them.
 

tantalum

Hope for the best. Expect the worst
Sponsor
Apr 2, 2002
25,123
13,967
Missouri
I thought there was a report a couple seasons ago that Gillis and ownership were back on speaking terms. Now I don’t think you go down that path, even though I think he’d make a great president.

There are other good guys out there I’m sure that would take the job...if they had autonomy.
 

bossram

Registered User
Sep 25, 2013
15,559
14,785
Victoria
No, that's not the case. Aquilini isn't even a penny pincher. He's what happens if CDC/Reddit/Twitter/whatever casual fan base gets their own hockey team and decides to take an active role.

Everyone is looking for explanations with ownership like "oh he's stupid" or "oh he's cheap" when the reality is he's just a fan who doesn't spend tons of time analyzing and discussing hockey. That's usually fine, but it's very concerning when they have an active role in determining the future for this team.

The media has treated this management group with kid gloves for their entire tenure, now their knives are out and little casual fan Frankie will probably take notice.

This is the best explanation I've seen. Aqua is really just a "casual" who happened to have enough money to buy a team.

He's like if r/Canucks ran an NHL team. Good call there.
 

canucksfan

Registered User
Mar 16, 2002
43,994
9,587
British Columbia
Visit site
Next season, Nucks have just under 23 million in cap space. Between Demko, EP, and Hughes I would think at least 18 million goes there. That's five million left to get 6 players under contract. Ferland likely goes on LTIR so that's going to be about 8 million.

The defense will be Hughes, Myers, Schmidt, Juolevi, Chatfield and Rathbone. I expect them to acquire a defenseman but it won't be a high priced one. SOmeone around 2-3 million.
 

Bubbles

Die Hard for Bedard 2023
Apr 16, 2004
8,511
7,758
BC Teams:Nucks,Juve
I thought there was a report a couple seasons ago that Gillis and ownership were back on speaking terms. Now I don’t think you go down that path, even though I think he’d make a great president.

There are other good guys out there I’m sure that would take the job...if they had autonomy.

They buried the hatchet so that Gillis was back for the Sedins retirement ceremony. I don't think they talk much to be honest.

What Gillis wants is too much power to give one person.
 

Reverend Mayhem

Lowly Serf/Reluctant Cuckold
Feb 15, 2009
28,280
5,394
Port Coquitlam, BC
Limping through the season is stupid because we need to make sure we make something of the season.

You need a smart GM to sell rentals, clear cancers, and acquire players that teams don’t want to expose and lose for nothing.

There is always time to be an opportunist. Why waste it by letting the muck sit around and the negativity fester? Just stupid.

That is what I think as well. Doubt the market is going to be buzzing this year, but what could it hurt? It's crazy, you know how badly Nonis could've f***ed us over taking the Richards deal?
 

Megaterio Llamas

el rey del mambo
Oct 29, 2011
11,235
5,956
North Shore
Not extending Greener after the playoffs despite all the criticism was real stroke of genius on the part of Mr Aquilini. Just imagine the pickle we'd be in with Greener on a new long term contract.

You just can't develop that kind of judgement by reading books; that's innate. Whoever Mr Aquilini's new managerial partner winds up being, one thing is certain. He'll be learning from a grandmaster...
 

RandV

It's a wolf v2.0
Jul 29, 2003
26,859
4,951
Vancouver
Visit site
No, that's not the case. Aquilini isn't even a penny pincher. He's what happens if CDC/Reddit/Twitter/whatever casual fan base gets their own hockey team and decides to take an active role.

Everyone is looking for explanations with ownership like "oh he's stupid" or "oh he's cheap" when the reality is he's just a fan who doesn't spend tons of time analyzing and discussing hockey. That's usually fine, but it's very concerning when they have an active role in determining the future for this team.

The media has treated this management group with kid gloves for their entire tenure, now their knives are out and little casual fan Frankie will probably take notice.

If he wasn't the owner I've always likened him to the type of fan who will call into after hours radio shows to bitch about the team.

What I'm adding here though is the Aquilini's willingness to spend our not has never really been demonstrated because he took over the team in the cap era with player cost controls and the Canucks have always been a high earning team. Like at the teams best he was letting Gillis spend on sleep doctors and the like to try and find that extra competitive edge, but the team was also probably raking in twice as much in revenue as player salaries. So it's easy to be seen as generous spenders in that situation, but how much they're willing to spend when the team is losing money we don't exactly know. Seems like Benning has brought us to a breaking point but that could also be the pandemic making everything in the NHL wonky.
 

RobertKron

Registered User
Sep 1, 2007
15,510
8,643
No, that's not the case. Aquilini isn't even a penny pincher. He's what happens if CDC/Reddit/Twitter/whatever casual fan base gets their own hockey team and decides to take an active role.

Everyone is looking for explanations with ownership like "oh he's stupid" or "oh he's cheap" when the reality is he's just a fan who doesn't spend tons of time analyzing and discussing hockey. That's usually fine, but it's very concerning when they have an active role in determining the future for this team.

The media has treated this management group with kid gloves for their entire tenure, now their knives are out and little casual fan Frankie will probably take notice.

Yeah, you're telling me that the guy who was asked what style of play he'd like the team to adopt and replied with "my favourite style of play is winning!" is out there telling them what specific shitty plug they should be acquiring and how much they should be paying them?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad