Double-Shift Lasse
Just post better
Let's clarify for the sake of everyone's sanity. I thought you were trying to prove some sort of broad consensus that Wennberg was a future #1C. You have proven that there are many who thought he could become one and a handful who thought, at a time he was playing his best, that he was one already. If that was your goal, to show that there were any posters at all who made the contention, then I'll allow that you've proven your point.
Using this as a jumping off point, I will ask where the voices were at the time of these posts you're copying here, telling everyone that, in fact, Wennberg is very bad and is lucky to be a #3C at best.
I will point out again, as it went unaddressed, that there was a poster in one of the threads you linked claiming victory, that people hassled him for believing Wennberg was going to be very good and now here he is, playing very well and that made this individual poster right and all the naysayers wrong. Seems like it's possible that the ability to claim to be right is fungible.
Using this as a jumping off point, I will ask where the voices were at the time of these posts you're copying here, telling everyone that, in fact, Wennberg is very bad and is lucky to be a #3C at best.
I will point out again, as it went unaddressed, that there was a poster in one of the threads you linked claiming victory, that people hassled him for believing Wennberg was going to be very good and now here he is, playing very well and that made this individual poster right and all the naysayers wrong. Seems like it's possible that the ability to claim to be right is fungible.