Juve
Registered User
What is people's issue with Donnarumma?
He had a very good season. Best save percentage in Serie A of any goalie playing 3000+ minutes at 75.6%. Great for a 20 y/o.
Look at some of my previous posts. You'll understand.
What is people's issue with Donnarumma?
He had a very good season. Best save percentage in Serie A of any goalie playing 3000+ minutes at 75.6%. Great for a 20 y/o.
How is Barcelona gonna buy both Griezmann and Neymar?
Maybe I'm entirely wrong but I feel like that trio wouldn't work against the best teams. Just seems like they would all get in each other's way.if they offer 2 good players (couthino, rakitic) to psg in return for neymar then they can probaly put the price down to something like €120 million for neymar.
neymar - griezmann - messi
From an ability standpoint, I'm not. From a team dynamic standpoint, I am. He was being difficult in his last contract negotiation and was a faulty fax machine away from being a Galactico. He's in a difficult run of form and he's making another contract negotiation hell.You sure about that?
I agree it's not as cut and dry with DDG. I would be okay selling him (also would be okay keeping him) but I just don't want Donnaruma to replace him.From an ability standpoint, I'm not. From a team dynamic standpoint, I am. He was being difficult in his last contract negotiation and was a faulty fax machine away from being a Galactico. He's in a difficult run of form and he's making another contract negotiation hell.
I'm sure I'm not alone in thinking that it's not as cut and dry that he'll be in a United shirt beyond next season as it seems.
I've bashed Bellerin a lot and even though he isn't a prospect anymore, he is still damn good.I also like the "promising U23" Hector Bellerin.
Who's not promising and not U23. He's O24.
It makes sense.That article also does not entirely address it. The law is supposed to attract rich people to move to Italy, because of course rich people really need more tax breaks. See below:
New tax regime for players who move to Italy boosts Serie A financial firepower
No he's not a destroyer.Thanks. Not that bad, the head part of the game can always be fixed. Chiellini can always give him a couple of shots across the head to set him straight.
Can he potentially turn into a "destroyer" type midfield? That's what we have been lacking since Vidal and Pogba(ish) have left.
If Barca wants to spend 120M, Dembele will have to come too.if they offer 2 good players (couthino, rakitic) to psg in return for neymar then they can probaly put the price down to something like €120 million for neymar.
neymar - griezmann - messi
Yeah he's not promising. Nor U23.I've bashed Bellerin a lot and even though he isn't a prospect anymore, he is still damn good.
Yeah he's not promising. Nor U23.
No he's not a destroyer.
He's an insane technical talent.
I'll give you an example.
In the youth ranks he was so much better than anyone else that sometimes he challenged himself to only make one touch on the ball for entire games. One touch football and nothing else. And he would still dominate.
Ornstein (Bob McKenzie level good) said that Zaha went to the CP owner to try to get a move to the Arsenal - who is his dream team, but it sounds like Palace still want 80 million for him. LOL.
If Arsenal can't get Zaha, they're focusing their attention on Keita Balde from Monaco which it sounds like they want 30 million for him. Ziyech wants to come to Arsenal, sounds like we're his childhood club yet Sevilla is the team who made a bid for him (Ajax wants 36 million for him).
Celtic declined a 17.5m+7m add-on bid from the Arsenal for Tierney. Celtic doesn't mind the money, but they want all the money upfront.
E: Arsenal signed a 300 million kit deal from Adidas, I am not saying that majority of it can go to transfers, but holy **** we can't use at least 20 million of that and add it to our 40 million?
Yeah he's not promising. Nor U23.
Injuries have stunted him (and obviously U23 is just factually incorrect), but he's probably a top 5 RB in the Prem. TAA and Azpi are both far far better than him, but he's in the next tier below. He probably won't get that much better though, so I agree that he should'nt be considered "promising."
I bet the Arsenal fans would be willing to pay that. I'm not taking that if I am Palace. I want straight cash. They just got 50m for AWB. They can get a better replacement than Chambers who is mediocre at best, and has a lot of warts. Money only, no makeweights if I am moving my best player.By the way, it was reported that Crystal Palace would consider 60 million + Callum Chambers for Zaha. Would you be willing to pay that? I certainly would.
I bet the Arsenal fans would be willing to pay that. I'm not taking that if I am Palace. I want straight cash. They just got 50m for AWB. They can get a better replacement than Chambers who is mediocre at best, and has a lot of warts. Money only, no makeweights if I am moving my best player.
I bet the Arsenal fans would be willing to pay that. I'm not taking that if I am Palace. I want straight cash. They just got 50m for AWB. They can get a better replacement than Chambers who is mediocre at best, and has a lot of warts. Money only, no makeweights if I am moving my best player.
I completely, but respectfully, disagree with this. Palace shouldn't move off their cash valuation, and I disagree with you on Chambers.60m + Chambers for Zaha would be a hysterical move for Arsenal to do. Chambers looked really solid for Fulham this year and Zaha isn't worth 60m.
Why won't he get much better? He just turned 24 and is coming of his best season in a long time under a new manager who improved him a lot, and seemingly suits his play style, since he likes fast fullbacks who push forward and deliver low cutbacks.
He is better than Azpilicueta now, Azpi was not impressive at all this year, especially offensively. I would say Bellerin is number 3 behind Walker and Alexander Arnold, and slightly ahead of AWB, but far ahead of Azpilicueta, Dalot and both of the clowns playing right back at the bottle jobs.