- Jan 18, 2016
- 34,425
- 25,671
Had to have been from another incident. The 2 angles they showed Pogba didn't even make contact with Neves.I guess those studs marks on his ankle were from magic?
Had to have been from another incident. The 2 angles they showed Pogba didn't even make contact with Neves.I guess those studs marks on his ankle were from magic?
Must've been a gust of windI guess those studs marks on his ankle were from magic?
Might? LolGreenwood is f***ing nuts, he might be better than Saka
I saw contact but regardless, even going into a tackle with studs showing is supposed to be a foul.Had to have been from another incident. The 2 angles they showed Pogba didn't even make contact with Neves.
Don’t act like it’s a given in any directionMight? Lol
Than you should get your eyes checked.I saw contact but regardless, even going into a tackle with studs showing is supposed to be a foul.
Take of the Red Devils glasses my guy. And again, should be a foul even without contact.Than you should get your eyes checked.
Take of the Red Devils glasses my guy. And again, should be a foul even without contact.
Greenwood is f***ing nuts, he might be better than Saka
I desperately wanted to see a foul from the one replay I didn’t think it was
Studs up into the ankle. Yellow card all day.
You can see the contact, plus the foot is being bent back, plus the shin pad is moving around Neves’ leg.Doesnt say conclusively that he was touched?
There may have been contact but I can’t imagine that looking at Dean, taking two steps and then deciding to go down helped his case.Fair enough. The angle they showed made it look like there was no contact.
Doesnt say conclusively that he was touched?