Player Discussion Phillip Danault part 2

[ECWHSWI]

hehehehehe right, just like how your jets are lighting it up eh.

my dude here posting how the jets apprently do against other teams and not the habs LOL.

i suggest you reread my posts and not your posts for clarity.

Anyway I’ll stop correcting you, it’s bad for morale. Peace and love my dude !

your posts are pretty clear, you're clearly in trolling mode, so you do that kid.


Dont forget to keep loving your 0.2 PPG favorite player. ciao.

 

[CHfan1]

gunna be part of Canada’s shut down line with couturier and oreilly. Can’t wait

Can you imagine teams have to face that line and the next line to jump over the boards has McDavid and MacKinnon on it.

 

[ECWHSWI]

Can you imagine teams have to face that line and the next line to jump over the boards has McDavid and MacKinnon on it.

that line is what ? Couturier, Oreilly and who ?

 

[CHfan1]

that line is what ? Couturier, Oreilly and who ?

Mark Stone.

 

[canucklover123]

Can you imagine teams have to face that line and the next line to jump over the boards has McDavid and MacKinnon on it.

and then Sid Bergeron and Marchand, just to really stick it to them. Lmao I can’t wait, what a lineup

 

[Prairie Habs]

Can you imagine teams have to face that line and the next line to jump over the boards has McDavid and MacKinnon on it.

Mackinnon- McDavid- barzal
Bergeron - Crosby - Marchand
Huberdeau - Stamkos- point
Couturier - ROR - stone

Enjoy, rest of the world

*this is assuming TSN is wrong and Hyman is somehow left off

 

[canucklover123]

Mackinnon- McDavid- barzal
Bergeron - Crosby - Marchand
Huberdeau - Stamkos- point
Couturier - ROR - stone

Enjoy, rest of the world

*this is assuming TSN is wrong and Hyman is somehow left off

Yep I have essentially the same, Point at C though, stammer on the wing.

They carry 14F, so not sure which two, but 2 of 4 of the following as well: Hall, Tavares, Marner, Scheifle

Leaning towards Tavares (Felt like they would bring one of Tavares or Toews even if they weren't the best for experience. With toews hurt, makes sense to get JT there and then Marner if they do duos

Edit: Horvat too will be considered. Lol what a lineup

 

[Monsieur Miz]

Pageau does not shut down other players therefore his 13 pts in 12 PO games are worth nothing.

He's always compared to him around here but not when offensive production comes into play I guess.

 

[Habs Halifax]

Mackinnon- McDavid- barzal
Bergeron - Crosby - Marchand
Huberdeau - Stamkos- point
Couturier - ROR - stone

Enjoy, rest of the world

*this is assuming TSN is wrong and Hyman is somehow left off

Huberdeau / McDavid / Point: I'd put the right handed center with the left handed McDavid. Then the shooter and play maker Huberdeau.

Marchand / Crosby / MacKinnon: NS (Halifax) line. They click and you bet they want this. Once again, left handed center with right handed center playing wing. Marchand does his thing. I don't think it's a good idea to have McDavid with MacKinnon. On the PP for sure though

Tavares / Bergeron / Marner: Tavares and Marner know each other's game and anybody can play with the 200' Bergeron. Right handed center with a left handed center playing wing. Marner has to show ability to be mentality strong or Scheifele takes his spot (or someone else). At the end of the day, Marner makes my roster cause we need his skating and creativity. However, this is best on best and some other guys are big and skate well too. This won't be NHL regular season where you feast on weak links on several teams

Stamkos / ROR / Barzal: A very dangerous 4th line with ROR as the 200' and faceoff guy.

Depth: Stone, Couturier, Scheifele, Toews

You guys board today? What about Danault making this team as a shut down center over Couturier?

 

[Be a Hab]

Danault between 3.5-4M would be fair.

It would be sad if Danault walked and went somewhere like Toronto.

 

[Archijerej]

wonder how VGK manage to shutdown McK so far, Danault doesnt play for them!

Just go with Suzuki-Kotkaniemi-Evans-whoever next season and see what happens.

I guarantee we will not have to worry about shutting down anyone in the playoffs.

 

[ECWHSWI]

Just go with Suzuki-Kotkaniemi-Evans-whoever next season and see what happens.

I guarantee we will not have to worry about shutting down anyone in the playoffs.

well I guess being the underdog, being the cinderella story is our only hope to have some kind of PO run.

that's the standard now for Habs fans.

 

[teamfirst]

well I guess being the underdog, being the cinderella story is our only hope to have some kind of PO run.

that's the standard now for Habs fans.

Yeah, TOUGHEN UP Habs fans

 

[Spring in Fialta]

well I guess being the underdog, being the cinderella story is our only hope to have some kind of PO run.

that's the standard now for Habs fans.

My God. Just enjoy it. This board sometimes...

 

[Spring in Fialta]

Anybody still trashing Danault should simply be ignored regarding hockey and really, any subject that requires any sort of nuance, analysis and critical thinking skills.

 

[ECWHSWI]

Anybody still trashing Danault should simply be ignored regarding hockey and really, any subject that requires any sort of nuance, analysis and critical thinking skills.

yeah cause only people who love their 0.2PPG Danault have nuance and critical thinking right ?

 

[Spring in Fialta]

yeah cause only people who love their 0.2PPG Danault have nuance and critical thinking right ?

Yes, they do. He's obviously a good player and he's getting tons of praise around the entire league.

 

[ECWHSWI]

Yes, they do. He's obviously a good player and he's getting tons of praise around the entire league.

and I have yet to see one poster saying he's not playing well defensively...

 

[Habs Halifax]

Danault between 3.5-4M would be fair.

It would be sad if Danault walked and went somewhere like Toronto.

I'll be shocked if it's less than $5M AAV. Perhaps Covid flat cap helps us though.

$3.5M - $4M range is not really fair in my books. Just cause we got Toffoli for a good AAV, it don't mean that is the standard. If we try to push for a low ball AAV, Danault walks cause you insult him. Oilers would welcome him for $4M for sure and Danault might say screw you for low balling him, he will take the low ball offer and play with someone else.

He's in his prime and is a very valuable middle 2C that most teams are after. Supply and Demand always sets the market price.

Term is key IMO. I don't care one bit if we have to overpay him by $500k or $1M for the years where we will bridge Suzuki, KK, Romanov, Caufield. I say pay him for 3 years. Otherwise, we take steps backwards and other teams can focus on Suzuki and KK more and you might not like what you see

 

[Spring in Fialta]

and I have yet to see one poster saying he's not playing well defensively...

Okay? And who's calling Danault an offensive dynamo? Who's even expecting him to be? Frankly, it doesn't even seem like Ducharme's asking him to do any of that either.

 

[ECWHSWI]

Okay? And who's calling Danault an offensive dynamo? Who's even expecting him to be? Frankly, it doesn't even seem like Ducharme's asking him to do any of that either.

Ok what ? you were talking about "people trashing Danault" a few posts earlier while in reality everybody Danault agrees he's doing great -> defensively <-

If that's trashing to you, then you're the one lacking nuance and critical thinking here.

 

[Spring in Fialta]

Ok what ? you were talking about "people trashing Danault" a few posts earlier while in reality everybody Danault agrees he's doing great -> defensively <-

If that's trashing to you, then you're the one lacking nuance and critical thinking here.

You keep rambling incoherently about his PPG. How is that not trashing him?

 

[ECWHSWI]

You keep rambling incoherently about his PPG. How is that not trashing him?

and how is it trashing him ? cause I did not say he's the best Habs forward ever or something ?

You talk nuance and critical thinking, yet you think anyone who doesnt see Danault as the best Habs ever is trashing him... and i'm the one being incoherent right ?

 

[Spring in Fialta]

and how is it trashing him ? cause I did not say he's the best Habs forward ever or something ?

You talk nuance and critical thinking, yet you think anyone who doesnt see Danault as the best Habs ever is trashing him... and i'm the one being incoherent right ?

Oh boy. Yup. That's exactly what I said. Thank you for proving my point. Goodbye.

 

[ECWHSWI]

Oh boy. Yup. That's exactly what I said. Thank you for proving my point. Goodbye.

you don't have one.