TB87
Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn
- May 30, 2018
- 6,100
- 17,166
I went hard after picture 1 and it was completely off the cuff
You should track it like a quarterback and call them "hurries"I'm going back and re-tracking those 15 Mason Millman games. I think exits under heavy pressure, entries under heavy pressure, and just passes under heavy pressure would be of interest to people. That's the norm for pro defenseman so it's worthwhile to see how he does in this particular area in junior. Defensive zone 1-on-1's, & offensive zone activations that lead to scoring chances for, goals for, scoring chances against, & goals against will be added to the data set too.
*Heavy Pressure defined as: forechecker and/or opponent at or within a sticks length away*
You should track it like a quarterback and call them "hurries"
Hurried pass completion, hurried zone exits, etc
Would quantify quick decision making i.e. hockey IQ
So, *Social Distancing?*Heavy Pressure defined as: forechecker and/or opponent at or within a sticks length away*
Did some hockey talk last night with @Appleyard and Angry Jim of Flyers HW Radio
I just listened. Good stuff. It was kinda weird listening to people talk about our prospects who've actually watched them play. Definitely not the norm.
Not just that, but Ted openly said he didn't want to comment on Tristen Robbins because he's never seen him play. I don't know why it's so hard for people to do that, but it's exactly what I want to hear. No one is going to get to every player in a draft.
Imagine a world where people admit their ignorance.Not just that, but Ted openly said he didn't want to comment on Tristen Robbins because he's never seen him play. I don't know why it's so hard for people to do that, but it's exactly what I want to hear. No one is going to get to every player in a draft.
Same. I know f***-all about the CBA and I don't watch the majority of the non-AHL prospects enough to have any kind of meaningful opinion (unless you can see they have a glaring deficiency or clearly excel at something in a small sample).Imagine a world where people admit their ignorance.
You'll never see me in the NHL draft thread (outside of memeing) because I don't watch the prospects pre-draft. I have nothing to offer.
I don’t know who needs to hear this, but no, Noah Cates isn’t the Flyers best college prospect.
He’s in the top 3 for sure. Firmly at #3. Which is nothing to shake a stick at.
Firmly?I don’t know who needs to hear this, but no, Noah Cates isn’t the Flyers best college prospect.
He’s in the top 3 for sure. Firmly at #3. Which is nothing to shake a stick at.
Firmly?
Speaking of which, I know there is no rush, but why is Kalynuk still unsigned?
The podcasting must be getting to your head.Dang nabbit. How could I forget about Wyatt the 1st???
I have failed you all and I am so sorry.
Cates is firmly the #4 college prospect.
Geez, what a whiff on my part.
The podcasting must be getting to your head.
Speaking of which, I know there is no rush, but why is Kalynuk still unsigned?
Dang nabbit. How could I forget about Wyatt the 1st???
I have failed you all and I am so sorry.
Cates is firmly the #4 college prospect.
Geez, what a whiff on my part.
I've sort of mentally moved on from Kalynuk, unfortunately. For NCAA, I'd go Brink, York, and then a slight edge to the TanMan over Cates. Even though Cates has won me over.
Cates is the final prospect in my rankings I'd describe as a pretty heavy favorite to have a lengthy NHL career.
1. Frost
2. Brink
3. York
4. Zamula
5. Laczynski
6. Cates
*Don't know if Sandin counts as a prospect.
Between his frame and some skating and shooting ability Allison scream "guy that NHL GMs take a shot on till somehow he has played 400 games even if none of his career has been very good"