wolffy66
Registered User
- Dec 16, 2009
- 512
- 0
What does this even mean?
It means he considers them to be the same. Pretty flawed theory for a lot of reasons but he's little kid so we should cut him some slack.
What does this even mean?
I'm glad people finally start to realize Johnston is the new Bylsma.
Rutherford pretty solid B+
Johnston E better than Bylsma,but that really doesn't say much lol.I don't think he's the solution to this team thb.
Mike Johnston sucks.Next.
Yeah,I can't wait to see another random combo MJ throws on the ice.
I'm curious as to how you think that to be true.
-Keep putting Malkin on Sutter's wing when it's clearly not working
-split Spaling-Sutter-downie line when it worked well.Moving Spaling to top-6.He's sucked since then.
- Ebbett-Malkin -Rust
-Kunitz to third line when Spaling struggles in the top 6
- No adjustment against flyers,rangers,islanders
Something I can think of right now.
-Keep putting Malkin on Sutter's wing when it's clearly not working
-split Spaling-Sutter-downie line when it worked well.Moving Spaling to top-6.He's sucked since then.
- Ebbett-Malkin -Rust
-Kunitz to third line when Spaling struggles in the top 6
- No adjustment against flyers,rangers,islanders
Something I can think of right now.
Here is a revelation...
ANY coach this org hires, will do things many of us disagree with. Let's ignore the fact that his system and how he runs his bench is almost a complete 180 from DB.
We *****ed about Kunktz attached to Crosby, and now he is on the third line.
I recently *****ed about BB not playing with Malkin, and MJ said in the PG yesterday they will play together.
I wanted Perron on the first PP, and now he is there.
Most of us dislike Adams, but he is used only sparingly.
About the only thing he is doing that most of us are annoyed with currently, is using Scuds. However, he's a vet and the other guys are pretty green. So just about every other coach would be doing the same anyway.
How anyone can be comparing him to DB is comical. MJ is actually doing many of the things we want, and you think he is like DB?
Ok....
Holy ****, 17 pages of Pregame talk?
you need to switch to 50 posts-per-page.
-Keep putting Malkin on Sutter's wing when it's clearly not working
-split Spaling-Sutter-downie line when it worked well.Moving Spaling to top-6.He's sucked since then.
- Ebbett-Malkin -Rust
-Kunitz to third line when Spaling struggles in the top 6
- No adjustment against flyers,rangers,islanders
Something I can think of right now.
you need to switch to 50 posts-per-page.
Anyhow, 3 days off, pregame thread made on a monday, it's going to get a lot of hits
It would be nice if Goc's illness wasn't the mumps. I'd like to think we're finally over this crap.
EDIT:
Wut? How?
It would be nice if Goc's illness wasn't the mumps. I'd like to think we're finally over this crap.
EDIT:
Wut? How?
hm. I wonder if I'm grandfathered in?
Under "User CP" => "Edit Options"
you can select the number of posts-per-page. Mine says 'Default' now, and I'm still at 50, but the option for 50 is no longer there
no Farnham?