I'd do that too but it seems like their preference is to have a more finesse player as the 3rd man on each line a la Boedker/Donskoi/Labanc. It's not that different from the way they distribute out the PWFs. I could get behind doing:I think unless Thornton comes back we'll see Pavelski with Meier and Kane.
I liked the: "I don't see how a team could come back in a series after losing the first game 7-0" narrative that was being pushed. hmm. New to hockey?Im loving the main board ref ***** session
Uhh they were actually pretty dominant with a lot of output. Kane took over game 1 and Donskoi took over game 3. That's not say that I don't think Meier should stay with Pavelski....it makes sense to get Kane out running his own line to help create some match up problems for Vegas. Vegas isn't even that fast or skilled, but they have incredible positioning and every line is out there moving the puck with fast transitioins, need to disrupt that.It’s not a coincidence that Pavelski’s line was pretty much a non-factor in a sweep of Anaheim and sucked in game 1 and then suddenly with Meier, Pavelski has what might have been his best game of the season.
I don't either. Basically, the Sharks lost that game so bad they are now relegated to the draft lotto.I liked the: "I don't see how a team could come back in a series after losing the first game 7-0" narrative that was being pushed. hmm. New to hockey?
I liked the: "I don't see how a team could come back in a series after losing the first game 7-0" narrative that was being pushed. hmm. New to hockey?
Seriously, do people not understand that blowouts mean nothing? They happen very often and they usually have more to do with random variance than anything else.
To me, a win like Winnipeg’s in game 1 against Minnesota where they just completely dominated for the entirety of a close game is a lot more telling than what happened tonight.
I liked the: "I don't see how a team could come back in a series after losing the first game 7-0" narrative that was being pushed. hmm. New to hockey?
I still think the long time off is what did us in for Game 1. Look at the Lightning tonight. A week off and they get drilled at home. Serious question because I don't know the answer: is their fanbase ready to jump off a cliff like we were after Game 1?
Seriously, do people not understand that blowouts mean nothing? They happen very often and they usually have more to do with random variance than anything else.
To me, a win like Winnipeg’s in game 1 against Minnesota where they just completely dominated for the entirety of a close game is a lot more telling than what happened tonight.
Nah. He didn't look tired. He got up fine and climbed right over. Looked nonchalant. More like "we should't be celebrating after the way we played and the way we got blown out last game.
It's not necessarily that they had fewer chances because statistically they didn't. It's simply that the Sharks were able to skate, slow them down, and not let this one get away from them. They were able to build and capitalize on momentum created this time to stem the tide.
I liked the: "I don't see how a team could come back in a series after losing the first game 7-0" narrative that was being pushed. hmm. New to hockey?
Are you including OT in the statistics for the night? I agree with you that the Sharks played better, which is what led to fewer opportunities for Vegas. The Sharks also were really good at clearing out any rebounds and blocking shots. Vegas didn’t have many second opportunities and sustained pressure until the 3rd when they were behind.
Blowouts are easy to get over and motivation.
Hello. Free Joakim Ryan. Tomas Hertl is amazing. That is all.
It depends on the metrics. Overall the scoring chances tonight were 30-29 Knights with the Sharks winning the high danger chances 12-11. In regulation, it was 17-16 Sharks and 7-5 Sharks in high danger. In game one, it was 37-31 Knights and 19-18 Knights in high danger. 5 on 5 though it was a lot closer to even between the two games.
This game just came down to the fact that the Sharks came out with their skating legs and made it tougher on them plus a huge coaching adjustment by DeBoer with having the defensemen stick it out longer at the Vegas blue line when they were trying to break out. That threw a huge wrench in their breakout that slowed them down big time. Vegas never really got into their rhythm because of that adjustment and that was the one thing that more or less went away in the 3rd. While they didn't completely turtle, they did switch from that kind of breakout pressure to the trap. They kept everything to the outside but still let in a goal but that was because Karlsson was an idiot for trying to block that shot that high and Jones let in another softie.
He looked extremely tired and took his time climbing over the bench. He also looked worn out on the walk to the locker room.Nah. He didn't look tired. He got up fine and climbed right over. Looked nonchalant. More like "we should't be celebrating after the way we played and the way we got blown out last game.
People in the main board are calling me crazy and saying I’m doing because I said that blowing a 2-0 lead and losing in 2OT at home to a team rolling 5D without their #1C and #1LW is a more crushing result than getting blown out on the road.
Joakim Ryan is almost certainly playing in game 3. Martin got the Tim Heed treatment tonight in an 85 minute game.
Joakim Ryan is almost certainly playing in game 3. Martin got the Tim Heed treatment tonight in an 85 minute game.
Very good observation; the defensemen getting in on the forecheck after line changes was a fantastic adjustment that paid dividends.
Also, maybe not best to look at only 5V5 numbers when Vegas took as many penalties as they did.
If the roles were reversed, the main board people would be saying the opposite. So many non Sharks fans are just cheering for the darling, it's sickening.
As to Ryan, I'll believe it when I see it. I just can't trust PDB when it comes to Joakim Ryan.
I definitely think Ryan should be in, but for DeMelo. He made a nice play on the goal, but he had so many defensive miscues. I get that he has decent mobility, but he misreads the play too often. I’m not sure what Martin did to earn the benching. I was disappointed that nobody asked DeBoer.
If siding is *that* important, then put in Heed instead.
I’m obviously biased towards Meier, but a player with his size who still has great hands, is mobile, and has good speed is so incredibly rare. I didn’t think he’d be able to punish people in the NHL but he’s a beast out there.