Chicklets will hate this. It goes against everything they want. If there are no stories there is no podcast. Chicklets allow teams/players to edit out as much as they want in Post production in order to avoid this exact scenario.
Probably.I think JR got carried away and wasn't thinking. Like I said, "doesn't make him smart".I agree...doesn't make him smart, but JR has probably been in from of a microphone for tens of thousands of minutes in his lifetime. You could train a dog to bark (or not bark) every time a microphone was placed in front of them. Are you saying JR is less trainable than my Cocker Spaniel?
Did not know this. Makes JR seem more dumb than I originally thought.Chicklets will hate this. It goes against everything they want. If there are no stories there is no podcast. Chicklets allow teams/players to edit out as much as they want in Post production in order to avoid this exact scenario.
Dude, that wasn't an interview, it was Styles and Whit and Biz just bull****ing over some beers, bro.What's amazing to me, and this doesn't just apply to JR, is how often people who should be media savvy step in it. Was he drunk? How is it he thought his comments would be ok? Maybe he doesn't understand that a podcast is essentially a radio interview.
Dude, that wasn't an interview, it was Styles and Whit and Biz just bull****ing over some beers, bro.
What? Oh, ****, people are gonna hear this???
I hope this doesn't deflate the podcast or make future guests more gun-shy. Current players are already a little more reserved than old guys who don't give a damn.
Relistened to the Taylor Hall episode from Feb 2017. Really a great show. His story about Glenn Anderson is a top 5 Chiclets story.
Bonus points for not just saying "dog" given the topic of threesomes.I think you can keep what's special about podcasts like Chiclets without violating "the rules."
Most sports interviews are very formulaic. The interviewer asks softball questions to which the interviewee provides cliché answers.
Podcasts are longer format and can explore more intimately, but you still have to follow "the rules."
1. Don't criticize your current coaching staff.
2. Don't criticize your current teammates.
3. Don't criticize the league or officiating.
4. Don't discuss your desire to have a threesome with Kathryn Tappen.
The rules are easy to follow, unless you are dumber than my Cocker Spaniel.
Chicklets will hate this. It goes against everything they want. If there are no stories there is no podcast. Chicklets allow teams/players to edit out as much as they want in Post production in order to avoid this exact scenario.
I agree...doesn't make him smart, but JR has probably been in from of a microphone for tens of thousands of minutes in his lifetime. You could train a dog to bark (or not bark) every time a microphone was placed in front of them. Are you saying JR is less trainable than my Cocker Spaniel?
It happened under their watch. They should have realized what he said and pulled it before it ever aired.I think most players realize that Roenick was punished because he's an active employee of an organization already embroiled in sexual harassment controversy that made skeezy comments about a female coworker. Really not that hard to avoid such a scenario if you have half a brain.
Biz tried to save it. They probably felt his redirect attempt and Roenick’s half -assed recovery would be enough to gloss it over. It wasn’t.It happened under their watch. They should have realized what he said and pulled it before it ever aired.
That’s ridiculous. We aren’t children. We’re adults. There’s a difference. Roenick shouldn’t have said he wanted to f*** his current work colleague. That’s pretty simple. It’s why nobody else on that extremely raunchy ADULT podcast has never gotten into trouble. They had the sense not to sexually harass current coworkers on the show. Haha.Its a matter of respecting each other. You can tell funny stories, make jokes just keep them clean and respectful. If you wouldn't tell your kids the comment you shouldn't tell your friends.
That’s ridiculous. We aren’t children. We’re adults. There’s a difference. Roenick shouldn’t have said he wanted to **** his current work colleague. That’s pretty simple. It’s why nobody else on that extremely raunchy ADULT podcast has never gotten into trouble. They had the sense not to sexually harass current coworkers on the show. Haha.
Adult humor is good and is not the problem.
That makes sense that you meant adult children! Haha. I’ve got a 5yr old and 2yr old so my head went to a completely different place!RT thats the great thing about these boards is people can have different opinions and values. My kids are 30 to 18 and we still have laughs, enjoy a beer and wings. All adults just very respectful of what we say. Well most of the time
That’s ridiculous. We aren’t children. We’re adults. There’s a difference. Roenick shouldn’t have said he wanted to **** his current work colleague. That’s pretty simple. It’s why nobody else on that extremely raunchy ADULT podcast has never gotten into trouble. They had the sense not to sexually harass current coworkers on the show. Haha.
Adult humor is good and is not the problem.
It's bad enough having to deal with that at work.
That's the unfortunate world we live in.
It's bad that people shouldn't make sexually crude comments about coworkers?
It's unfortunate that sexual harassment is increasingly unacceptable? What are you even fighting for.
That's not what I meant and you know it. You're not that stupid but that's the kind of self-righteous, sensitive crap I'm talking about. Thanks for being an example. Although I'm sure it was more about you just being a dick.
You are raging against the machine, except the machine in this case is taking a stand against sexual harassment and the type of environment it thrives in. I don't think you understand how awful your post comes off as in the context of this issue, as if being restrained from making sexual comments about coworkers is a form of 'PC' culture gone mad that makes for an 'unfortunate world' we have to live in.
No he wasn’t. He was talking about his coworker. Which is gross.He was joking about sexually desiring an attractive female. .
He’s not in trouble for “thinking”, he’s in trouble for saying gross sexual shit about his coworker on a national podcast.When did thinking a woman was "hot" and wanting to have sex with her become so bad? It's a ****ing chemical reaction..
Lighten up. He didn't say he was going to hurt the woman. When did thinking a woman was "hot" and wanting to have sex with her become so bad?
Now if he said something along the lines of I'd give her a promotion if she xxxx, we are talking about a lot different scenario.
He was joking about sexually desiring an attractive female. Something that's done around a table of friends all the time by normal, heterosexual males. It was stupid to say it on the air or at the workplace. But should the guy be crucified for it like he is?
That wasn't what that situation was. He got suspended. He'll lose a bunch of money. Let it die there. It doesn't make him a horrible person. But in today's PC world, you have to get behind the opinion that he needs to be banished forever. That's ridiculous.