Vegan Knight
Registered User
- Feb 16, 2018
- 5,213
- 2,756
Gusev is more of a playmaker right? Because Eakin and Tuch have pretty nice shots if he can set them up on the third line.
He is, but he can shoot the puck too.Gusev is more of a playmaker right? Because Eakin and Tuch have pretty nice shots if he can set them up on the third line.
I wouldn't touch the 4th line, I'd put him with Eakin and Tuch and sit Nosek.Let's look at last night's lineup. Who do you take out if you play Gusev. My vote would be either Carrier or Reaves and move Nosek to the 4th. I don't think we can afford not to play Nosek since we seem to like to give these guys so many power plays. They almost spent an entire period on the PP.
Nosek is too important for the PK, so Gusev on the 3rd line and Reaves or Carrier out?
Carrier is a better player overall but Reaves is the intimidating presence. I would prefer Carrier in.
Another unlikely possibility, Jon is bad to me, so could he be replaced by Gusev?
I think our PK can get by with Bill, Smith, Bellemare, Stastny, Stone and Eakin. I don't think we require Nosek on the PK all that much.Nosek is too important for the PK, so Gusev on the 3rd line and Reaves or Carrier out?
Carrier is a better player overall but Reaves is the intimidating presence. I would prefer Carrier in.
Another unlikely possibility, Jon is bad to me, so could he be replaced by Gusev?
Gallant's gonna sit Gusev for the whole playoffs and Shipachev will be saying "I told ya so, idiot."
Well we get a free year of ELC contract pricing if that happens.Gallant's gonna sit Gusev for the whole playoffs and Shipachev will be saying "I told ya so, idiot."
Well we get a free year of ELC contract pricing if that happens.
I would expect if Vegas drops a game they'll probably try Gusev eventually. But hand to god we may not know exactly what Gusev will be but I'd bet quite a lot of money that he's at least a better offensive option than Tomas Nosek.