Porter Stoutheart
We Got Wood
- Jun 14, 2017
- 14,927
- 11,328
Well, it wasn't Edmonton, Pittsburgh, Toronto, or Winnipeg. So I can live with it. The Rangers make for a good NHL dynasty, I suppose.
My lucky number is eleven so I feel like whoever we get there will be better than laf anyways!
How much chance do you think you guys actually draft Askarov?
Not much as Polie has struck out with Goalies in the past.How much chance do you think you guys actually draft Askarov?
It would definitely be a contentious issue with the fanbase. But I would definitely not be against it... well, just based on reading things. I've only seen Askarov in the WJC and he didn't look all that, but I am willing to accept there is more to what got him into this stratosphere of the draft rankings than that one tournament.How much chance do you think you guys actually draft Askarov?
Not much as Polie has struck out with Goalies in the past.
Hopefully he’ll be there at 11 for a trade down with someone like Ottawa (Islanders pick) and we can pick up a few later picks.
33 for sure jumping 11 spots in the 1st round is costly. The other 3 are so close it’s hard to differentiate. Probably 50 just to be evenI'm thinking NYI pick and 2 2nds. Ottawa can get a center, defenseman, and a goalie. Preds can have a metric ton of picks to do what they want. 1 1st and 4 2nds. Question is what 2nds do Ottawa give?: 33, 49, 50, 53
No, no, no. Maybe Askarov is and maybe he isn't the answer for us at #11. But there is no way we should trade down. We need to get more elite talent, and the best place to do that is higher in the draft. So while we probably have to talk about Askarov a little bit, if the conclusion is to go another direction, we should still be focused on using that pick, not trading it. Some very good forward options have been mentioned in this thread already. We already have those 2 2nds, we need the elite pick at #11 more than we need a couple more 2nds.Not much as Polie has struck out with Goalies in the past.
Hopefully he’ll be there at 11 for a trade down with someone like Ottawa (Islanders pick) and we can pick up a few later picks.
No, no, no. Maybe Askarov is and maybe he isn't the answer for us at #11. But there is no way we should trade down. We need to get more elite talent, and the best place to do that is higher in the draft. So while we probably have to talk about Askarov a little bit, if the conclusion is to go another direction, we should still be focused on using that pick, not trading it. Some very good forward options have been mentioned in this thread already. We already have those 2 2nds, we need the elite pick at #11 more than we need a couple more 2nds.
In a way, this becomes our chance to replace "What Might Have Been" from Fiala.
Anyhow you guys see is moving up in the draft? Im thinking that Buffalo should be in a position where they need NHL ready players more than they need prospects to develop? Moving up to 8 could give us a shot at Alex Holtz which would be interesting. Not sure who we send the other way though, but Im all ears for anyone not named FF/Arvy/Josi/Ekholm/Fabbro
Lottery Ball Number | Actual Team | Theoretical Team |
---|---|---|
1 | Edmonton | Carolina/Columbus (doesn't matter which) |
2 | Florida | Edmonton |
3 | Minnesota | Florida |
4 | Nashville | Minnesota |
5 (lottery winner) | NYR | Nashville |
6 | Pittsburgh | NYR/Pittsburgh (depending on outcome of Toronto/NYR series) |
7 | Toronto | Pittsburgh/Toronto (depending on outcome of Toronto/NYR series) |
8 | Winnipeg | Winnipeg |
They could have filled ours with helium and everyone else’s with Sulfur Hexafluoride.Um... the league still would have put in a slightly lighter or smaller ball, or one loaded with a little magnet, or whatever for the Rangers, so regardless of what order they were loaded into the machine, the Rangers still would have won. Duh.