Player Discussion: Marko Dano

Whileee

Registered User
May 29, 2010
46,075
33,132
Toronto fans said the same about Kessel & his lack of conditioning......
You don't have to be a Gary Roberts disciple to play in this league.
Dano is one of those guys that Maurice doesn't like for whatever his reason is.

He might like him fine, he just doesn't like him as much as Armia and Copp.

Dano got more PP time than Armia or Copp. Both of them produced more primary points/60 at 5v5 than Dano last season.

Kessel is an outstanding skater and elite offensive talent. Still, he was seen as expendable by Toronto. I'm not sure that a young player like Dano who isn't a top-end skater and is vying for a middle-6 role can afford to lag on conditioning.
 

Mortimer Snerd

You kids get off my lawn!
Sponsor
Jun 10, 2014
57,479
29,341
It would be Andrew Ladd and a 2nd for Stanley and Green. That's...not any better. :laugh:

Still not right. We are required to give VGK a player. If not Dano it would be someone else. Fulfilling that requirement would be part of the return for Ladd. It is neither Ladd's nor Dano's fault that #22 was used as it was.
 

nobody important

the pessimist returns
Jul 12, 2015
6,426
1,719
a quiet suburb
On the positive side, the discussion around this overvalued player will soon be over. Thank god.

Agreed. Then we can get our focus back on an even more overvalued player, Joel Armia. Yeah he's got a mean poke check, and once or twice a season he'll pull off some slick highlight reel stick handling but for the most part he is much sound and fury, signifying nothing. He's a slightly better Burmistrov to me.
 

Mortimer Snerd

You kids get off my lawn!
Sponsor
Jun 10, 2014
57,479
29,341
Agreed. Then we can get our focus back on an even more overvalued player, Joel Armia. Yeah he's got a mean poke check, and once or twice a season he'll pull off some slick highlight reel stick handling but for the most part he is much sound and fury, signifying nothing. He's a slightly better Burmistrov to me.

Oh wow! Do I ever disagree. Wait and see how he does with better linemates than Matthias & Lowry .... if he ever gets the chance.
 

nobody important

the pessimist returns
Jul 12, 2015
6,426
1,719
a quiet suburb
Oh wow! Do I ever disagree. Wait and see how he does with better linemates than Matthias & Lowry .... if he ever gets the chance.

I shall wait. We shall see. Nothing would make me happier than for Armia to have a breakout season. Maybe Connor-Roslovic-Armia is that dynamic third line in waiting. I'm just saying, for now I think people are still showing him too much love based on perceived potential than what he's actually contributed. Our bottom 6 is weak and he has to own some of that. If I thought LV shared this view of Armia and we could go into XD with 4-4-1 secure in the knowledge they would take Armia over Lowry or Perreault or Copp without any sweetening of the pot to encourage that, I would say we got off easily.
 

MrBoJangelz71

Registered User
Jan 14, 2014
4,972
6,078
They didn't trade Andrew Ladd.... they traded 3 months of Andrew Ladd, as he was a UFA.

Very, very different.

Not to mention the fact that we dodged a significant bullet not re-signing a 30 point player (8 assists last year playing essentially every game!!!!) for 7(!!!) years, $40M including a full NMC, which messes up the XP draft...

I'd HAPPILY take just Logan Stanley for that. I'd take a new garbage bin for the locker room in order to avoid that contract...

This.

And...
Regardless if Logan pans out, the trade netted us the right to the pick and Dano. If Dano goes in the XD, the value is the asset that was saved by acquiring him, whether we assume it Perreault or Lowry or who ever.

It was a solid return for Ladd
 

surixon

Registered User
Jul 12, 2003
49,242
70,747
Winnipeg
Agreed. Then we can get our focus back on an even more overvalued player, Joel Armia. Yeah he's got a mean poke check, and once or twice a season he'll pull off some slick highlight reel stick handling but for the most part he is much sound and fury, signifying nothing. He's a slightly better Burmistrov to me.

Armia's micro stats would lead me to believe that the Jets aren't wrong to think there is something more there offensively. Whether that materializes in points remains to be seen. On the flip side he already brings high level PK ability and a very sound defensive game to the table. Both of which we need on the team even if his offense never materializes.
 

WPGChief

Registered User
May 25, 2017
1,340
3,743
Winnipeg
jetsnation.ca
Armia's micro stats would lead me to believe that the Jets aren't wrong to think there is something more there offensively. Whether that materializes in points remains to be seen. On the flip side he already brings high level PK ability and a very sound defensive game to the table. Both of which we need on the team even if his offense never materializes.

B5wLNEO.png


Curious what would show up if you look at his zone entries more in-depth. I thought they were decent, but I guess not.


Also for the record:
5h71sjB.png


Perreault is the larger blue radius (Copp is smaller) and Lowry is the smaller green radius (Armia you can see in the other image above). EDIT: Now, based on these pictures alone, who would you protect as a 4th forward in a 4/4/1 XD? :sarcasm:
 
Last edited:

MrBoJangelz71

Registered User
Jan 14, 2014
4,972
6,078
Agreed. Then we can get our focus back on an even more overvalued player, Joel Armia. Yeah he's got a mean poke check, and once or twice a season he'll pull off some slick highlight reel stick handling but for the most part he is much sound and fury, signifying nothing. He's a slightly better Burmistrov to me.

Nope, Armia is the better player and definitely worth protecting over Dano.

He drove that line consistently all season Had his injury not occured, he was starting to cash in on his chances and may of had better success statistically last season.

I don't mind Dano, but Armia has more upside, a better skillset, and IMO a higher ceiling. With his agility, length and reach, puck control and size, I believe he can grow his board and corner play.

There were a few games Armia was our best player last season. He was performing at a very high level prior to his injury and I feel hopeful he will get back to that level next year and expand off it.

Dano just doesn't have that level of impact in his game.
 

ffh

Registered User
Jul 16, 2016
8,392
5,124
B5wLNEO.png


Curious what would show up if you look at his zone entries more in-depth. I thought they were decent, but I guess not.


Also for the record:
5h71sjB.png


Perreault is the larger blue radius (Copp is smaller) and Lowry is the smaller green radius (Armia you can see in the other image above). EDIT: Now, based on these pictures alone, who would you protect as a 4th forward in a 4/4/1 XD? :sarcasm:


do you have any graphs showing how many less points scheifele and little would get because lowry plays against top centres of other teams. for example everytime I watch the jets play la lowry plays against carter or kopitar or against Anaheim he plays against Kessler or getzlaf. would he not have better numbers if he played 82 games against only 3rd lines. and playing 82 games is a whole other thing.
 
Last edited:

mcpw

WPG
Jan 13, 2015
10,024
2,072
do you have any graphs showing how many less points scheifele and little would get because lowry plays against top centres of other teams. for example everytime I watch the jets play la lowry plays against carter or kopitar or against Anaheim he plays against Kessler or getzlaf. would he not have better numbers if he played 82 games against only 3rd lines. and playing 82 games is a whole other thing.

I can show you some graphs:

hockeyviz.com/fixedImg/qoct/1617/WPG/scheima93
Right column, red line is league average, blue bars are competition the player sees.
Scheifele sees a lot of top parings, few third pairings, few fourth lines.

hockeyviz.com/fixedImg/qoct/1617/WPG/littlbr87
Little sees a lot of top lines, few third pairings, few fourth lines.

hockeyviz.com/fixedImg/qoct/1617/WPG/lowryad93
Lowry sees a lot of bottom pairings, few top pairings, average forward lines.

Lowry doesn't play against top lines as much as Little and Scheifele do.

Wanna know what the graph of a true matchup center looks like?

hockeyviz.com/fixedImg/qoct/1617/CHI/toewsjo88
Toews plays against top lines a ton, he's rarely out there against bottom lines or pairings.
hockeyviz.com/fixedImg/qoct/1617/ANA/keslery84
Here's Kesler. He's out there against the top lines.
 

Whileee

Registered User
May 29, 2010
46,075
33,132
B5wLNEO.png


Curious what would show up if you look at his zone entries more in-depth. I thought they were decent, but I guess not.


Also for the record:
5h71sjB.png


Perreault is the larger blue radius (Copp is smaller) and Lowry is the smaller green radius (Armia you can see in the other image above). EDIT: Now, based on these pictures alone, who would you protect as a 4th forward in a 4/4/1 XD? :sarcasm:

Dano?
 

WPGChief

Registered User
May 25, 2017
1,340
3,743
Winnipeg
jetsnation.ca
do you have any graphs showing how many less points scheifele and little would get because lowry plays against top centres of other teams. for example everytime I watch the jets play la lowry plays against carter or kopitar or against Anaheim he plays against Kessler or getzlaf. would he not have better numbers if he played 82 games against only 3rd lines. and playing 82 games is a whole other thing.

Unfortunately I do not have access to Ryan+Corey's entire passing data, but here's a write-up which I believe uses 2015-16 data that explains what goes into this.

I think this quote from the article applies well to your belief:
I devised seven offensive metrics that explain how often and the many ways in which players contribute to offense. In order to not unfairly punish or reward players on teams that play slower or faster, indexes were created that accounted for how often a player contributed to offense. For example, if two players both set up shots at similar rates, but one is more integral to their team’s shot production, that influence will show up in the index. See below.

10 shot assists/60 minutes * 25% of team’s on-ice shots the player sets up = Index of 2.5

12 shot assists/60 minutes * 15% of team’s on-ice shots the player sets up = Index of 1.8

So, while the rate at which a player creates offense matters, it is important to account for how much influence they have on the team’s production.

Intuitively, you're probably somewhat correct in assuming that depending on who you play against will affect your numbers. Lowry and his linemates could be somewhat affected because Maurice wants him to "shut down" the opponent. But, a good defence doesn't/shouldn't take away from offence - once Lowry+ retrieves the puck, what are they most likely to do? Go to the other side of the rink and shoot the puck. Then the other team gets the puck and goes to the other side of the rink. This happens for 60 minutes, of which a player can be on for ~15 minutes of it. It's a lot of back-and-forths, with a lot of different things happening on the ice (is Lowry facing Getzlaf when he takes the puck into the ozone or did Getzlaf get off on a line change this time? etc.). Very basically and without looking too much into it and assuming the nature of the game and other research with Corsi (in things like Quality of Competition and Quality of Teammates) it should somewhat even out anyway across all players and events. (IMO there's a bit more research that needs to be done here that can only be done with IR/Chip player tracking.)

Should. Somewhat. I'm using this very weakly here. At the same time, because this is more offensively based (shots and shot assists (and entries)), it should also somewhat be more tied towards the players' individual talents, and not who are opposite of them on the ice. Is Lowry involved in a lot of passing? A lot of dangerous shot contributions? Total passing? If not, that's on him for not getting into open spaces to receive passes, or making passes/plays that are high danger chances, etc.

TL;DR: These graphs detail a player's individual talents and how they perform with the puck, not what they do with the puck against specific/different players. And then going into more what Ryan is using this data/charts for is matching certain teammates with playing styles, to find whom might complement one another.


Here's Scheifele and Little btw
, and the link to the Tableau itself so you can play around with it.
 

ffh

Registered User
Jul 16, 2016
8,392
5,124
I can show you some graphs:

hockeyviz.com/fixedImg/qoct/1617/WPG/scheima93
Right column, red line is league average, blue bars are competition the player sees.
Scheifele sees a lot of top parings, few third pairings, few fourth lines.

hockeyviz.com/fixedImg/qoct/1617/WPG/littlbr87
Little sees a lot of top lines, few third pairings, few fourth lines.

hockeyviz.com/fixedImg/qoct/1617/WPG/lowryad93
Lowry sees a lot of bottom pairings, few top pairings, average forward lines.

Lowry doesn't play against top lines as much as Little and Scheifele do.

Wanna know what the graph of a true matchup center looks like?

hockeyviz.com/fixedImg/qoct/1617/CHI/toewsjo88
Toews plays against top lines a ton, he's rarely out there against bottom lines or pairings.
hockeyviz.com/fixedImg/qoct/1617/ANA/keslery84
Here's Kesler. He's out there against the top lines.

I'm not saying he's Kessler because he isn't . but he can take some pressure off the top 2 lines by playing against the other teams top 2 lines from time to time. I don't think those stats on lowry mean as much as they appear. he played I'm guessing at least half the year without his teammates that were put together for that role. how much time did mathias and armia miss. of coarse he wont play against the other teams best with Stafford or dano and some of the other players that were available. but when mathias armia and lowry were together they seemed to get some hard matchups.
 

Tom ServoMST3K

In search of a Steinbach Hero
Nov 2, 2010
27,814
18,619
What's your excuse?
No matter what we'll be losing someone.

As much as I like Armia, Lowry, Copp and Dano, IMO, they're not really anything special. Pretty much every one is a solid bottom six player, that can play up in a pinch. (Well, maybe not Copp, but I think the jury is still out.) Even losing Perrault won't be the end of the world, because we're not hurting for skilled wingers, and we drop his salary, which could be a problem shortly.

We're going to lose one of those players.
 

KingBogo

Admitted Homer
Nov 29, 2011
31,722
39,980
Winnipeg
This.

And...
Regardless if Logan pans out, the trade netted us the right to the pick and Dano. If Dano goes in the XD, the value is the asset that was saved by acquiring him, whether we assume it Perreault or Lowry or who ever.

It was a solid return for Ladd

This. And the idea of continuously trying to carry over trades to subsequent moves boarders on the ridiculous. If E. Kane is traded to LA, does that now mean we only traded Bogo to Buffalo or do we now add what Buffalo received back from LA to the ledger? If Lowry gets claimed by LV does that make the Chicago trade better again because Dano would still be on the team? The Ladd trade pure and simple was a TD seller move - good vet on non playoff team with expiring contract for A level prospect with some promise and late 1st round pick. The top end of the going rate. Full stop. That was the trade.
 

surixon

Registered User
Jul 12, 2003
49,242
70,747
Winnipeg
B5wLNEO.png


Curious what would show up if you look at his zone entries more in-depth. I thought they were decent, but I guess not.


Also for the record:
5h71sjB.png


Perreault is the larger blue radius (Copp is smaller) and Lowry is the smaller green radius (Armia you can see in the other image above). EDIT: Now, based on these pictures alone, who would you protect as a 4th forward in a 4/4/1 XD? :sarcasm:

My thoughts are that Armia and Lowry need zone entry/transition offensive specialist to really complete that line. I feel that is where Connor comes in, I think he'll be lethal off the rush and his bows for the net should allow him to clean up on the high danger chances Armia is good at creating.
 
Last edited:

Whileee

Registered User
May 29, 2010
46,075
33,132
My thoughts are that Armia and Lowry need zone entry/transition offensive specialist to really complete that line. I feel that is where Connor comes in, I think he'll be lethal off the rush and his bows for the net should allow him to clean up on the high danger chances Armia is good at creating.

I like Perreault with Armia on the 3rd line, and Connor with Little and Wheeler on the 2nd line.
 

Howard Chuck

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jan 24, 2012
15,515
19,831
Winnipeg
I'm a huge believer that Armia can be much more than he is showing. Provide him with some talented linemates and he will shine imo. I agree that adding Connor (and even Roslo) to his line may make that a very dangerous (third) line.

I really hope we don't lose him.
 

Mortimer Snerd

You kids get off my lawn!
Sponsor
Jun 10, 2014
57,479
29,341
I shall wait. We shall see. Nothing would make me happier than for Armia to have a breakout season. Maybe Connor-Roslovic-Armia is that dynamic third line in waiting. I'm just saying, for now I think people are still showing him too much love based on perceived potential than what he's actually contributed. Our bottom 6 is weak and he has to own some of that. If I thought LV shared this view of Armia and we could go into XD with 4-4-1 secure in the knowledge they would take Armia over Lowry or Perreault or Copp without any sweetening of the pot to encourage that, I would say we got off easily.

I love what he did last year as a checking winger and PK'er. Potential be damned. He made the MLA line effective in the shutdown role. The weakness in our bottom 6 was 100% Maurice. He had the players available to build a much better bottom 6 but refused to use them according to their strengths.

I also still think he has at least a little more offensive potential if given decent linemates. Maybe quite a lot of offense. Who knows?

Not to mention that we are a little short on RW's. Armia gives us 3. If he was lost to expansion we are down to 2. How is no RW's making our bottom 6 better?
 

Coach G

Registered User
Oct 1, 2015
405
0
In the corners
I love what he did last year as a checking winger and PK'er. Potential be damned. He made the MLA line effective in the shutdown role. The weakness in our bottom 6 was 100% Maurice. He had the players available to build a much better bottom 6 but refused to use them according to their strengths.

I also still think he has at least a little more offensive potential if given decent linemates. Maybe quite a lot of offense. Who knows?

Not to mention that we are a little short on RW's. Armia gives us 3. If he was lost to expansion we are down to 2. How is no RW's making our bottom 6 better?

http://nhlinjuryviz.blogspot.ca/2016/10/201617-team-injury-breakdowns.html
I do dislike many of Coach Mo's lineup and deployment decisions, but I can't say that "the weakness in our bottom 6 was 100% Maurice." In fairness, at least 1 or 2% of that weakness was related to the 199 man-games lost to injury by our forwards. :laugh:
 

Mortimer Snerd

You kids get off my lawn!
Sponsor
Jun 10, 2014
57,479
29,341
I like Perreault with Armia on the 3rd line, and Connor with Little and Wheeler on the 2nd line.

I like the possibilities of Perreault - xxx - Armia. I'm assuming Connor starts the year there but moves up to 2LW at some point. xxx could be Lowry but I would rather a more offensively gifted 3C. Petan could be very good there with his passing/playmaking game. It needs to be tried to find out. If not him then Copp deserves a trial there. Then we have Roslovic and Harkins developing. Its too soon to count De Leo out too.

If neither Petan nor Copp can succeed there I go back to Lowry until one of the prospects is ready/able to push him down. But the other candidates need to be tried/given a chance.

We could have a strong, dynamic third line and a very good 4th line:
Perreault - Petan/other - Armia
Copp - Lowry - Matthias/other RW
Our bottom 6 does not have to be a weakness. In fact it could be a strength.

Based on last year it appears that Maurice has some rigid ideas about how the bottom 6 needs to be structured that don't make the best use of his assets.
 

Mortimer Snerd

You kids get off my lawn!
Sponsor
Jun 10, 2014
57,479
29,341
http://nhlinjuryviz.blogspot.ca/2016/10/201617-team-injury-breakdowns.html
I do dislike many of Coach Mo's lineup and deployment decisions, but I can't say that "the weakness in our bottom 6 was 100% Maurice." In fairness, at least 1 or 2% of that weakness was related to the 199 man-games lost to injury by our forwards. :laugh:

:laugh: OK, 1-2%.

The thing is that when we were healthy his preference was still:
Matthias - Lowry - Armia
Tanev - Copp - Thorburn
That is; a shutdown line with very little offensive potential and a 4th line that I can't even come up with a good label for. The 4th line is a place to park a specialist or 2 and/or a spare forward. Tanev = PK specialist, Copp = spare forward, Thor = punching bag. They are given an occasional shift to slightly reduce the workload on the top 9 but can't be trusted to take a regular shift/larger role.
 

Coach G

Registered User
Oct 1, 2015
405
0
In the corners
:laugh: OK, 1-2%.

The thing is that when we were healthy his preference was still:
Matthias - Lowry - Armia
Tanev - Copp - Thorburn
That is; a shutdown line with very little offensive potential and a 4th line that I can't even come up with a good label for. The 4th line is a place to park a specialist or 2 and/or a spare forward. Tanev = PK specialist, Copp = spare forward, Thor = punching bag. They are given an occasional shift to slightly reduce the workload on the top 9 but can't be trusted to take a regular shift/larger role.

Hence the small percentage. :laugh:
Seriously, though, Thorburn didn't dress for the season opener. I think (or try to believe?) that the plan was to run four lines who could all contribute. Alas, that plan was derailed as soon as Little went down in game 1, and all the subsequent injuries kept the shuffle going all season.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad