Bird Boys
Registered User
- May 18, 2018
- 80
- 35
Great point but that was king of a no brainer move.Lou is responsible for bringing in Trotz.
Great point but that was king of a no brainer move.Lou is responsible for bringing in Trotz.
Lou has said all year this is an evaluation year. He then said this season's success isn't changing his plan, which means he still views it as an evaluation year. I'm fine with him not giving up assets and getting more looks at the AHL guys as part of that. I'm also fine with the playoffs being part of the evaluation, as that can often be the most telling time for a player. Ultimately, it'll depend on how the evaluation works out in the future that will allow me to really judge how well he did this season, but for right now the team is looking to be in way better shape than last season. Even if I don't agree with all of Lou's moves, I still have to give him credit as a good GM based on that alone. His past history of success also buys him a lot of slack, IMO.Lou is responsible for everything hockey related. He’s done a great job this year when you look at the entirety of what he has done. Isles have done a complete 180 this year. Big off season for Lou coming up that will hopefully put his stamp on the team and help them take a next step.
However...he screwed the pouch at the deadline. You can’t expect to run the same 4 centres all yr...esp how Czikas plays and how old Fil is. Once they realized Gionta was not going to cut it they should have looked to bring someone in that can play C and wing. Kuhn/Fritz cannot be Plan B.
It was so no-brainer of a move that the team he just won the cup for lowballed him and every pundit in the country wrote us off as being bottom feeders this season even after signing him. Even if we assume it was a true no-brainer move, he still deserves loads of credit for being the guy that secured the asset everyone with a brain would be going after. I mean, it'd be just as much of a no-brainer to sign Panarin this summer, but I'd still give Lou a ton of credit for doing so if he pulled it off.Great point but that was king of a no brainer move.
To me it Starr's with how he handles the Ladd situation and the goalie situation. Ladd hurts the team when he's on the ice.OUR evaluation year of LL starts this summer.
Everything he's done up to now has been pretty boilerplate. That's not a knock, but the moves he's made were fairly obvious ones, though I do give him excellent marks for not getting antsy at the TD just because we were in good position. He knew that no one move or player was going to make us a Cup contender this year.
I like what LL did in the draft and hiring Trotz.
I liked the move to bring in Valteri. The Lehner move has obviously worked out.
Leo is just OK and Martin gives us toughness at a very affordable price.
I dislike everything else. And that's a big problem because the negTives largely out way the positives. If LL is idle again this Summer I will question his commitment to the team. When he aquired MM and LEO and helped them with their salary cap I started to feel Lam was still getting paid as a double agent for Toronto.
I wouldn't have a problem if ownership decided to relieve LL of his duties if we see the same team on the ice at the end of next season.
It's starting to appear as though the game has passed him buy. He is stubborn to a fault.
I'm starting to question whether ownership made mistake giving Lou Lam this much authority.
You nailed it!Leo was a free agent, how did that help Toronto’s cap?
Staple said Lou was big game hunting at the deadline, but didn’t want to pay the cost for a rental.
I highly doubt the team you see today will be the team you see on Sept 1.
Giving Lou this much authority has changed this organization from a Garth Snow clown show/amateur hour production to one of professionalism. That’s what happens when competent people are hired and allowed to manage.
For Trotz.Great point but that was king of a no brainer move.
I bolded that because sometimes the best moves you make are the ones you don't make (and I was someone advocating getting Lindholm at the time). Based on what CAR got for Lindholm/Hanafin, Lou would have had to deal Pulock plus a lot. But Lou specifically said he wanted to evaluate players and use time, so he held Pulock and he's improved 100% this year and become a legit 1st pairing defenseman.You nailed it!
This is precisely my problem with Lou. Why did he wait until the deadline to go big game hunting?
Buffalo didn't wait when they obtained Skinner.
Calgary didn't wait when they traded with Carolina either. Lindholm would have been a great fit with this team.Nino wasn't a deadline acquisition either.
And not all trades at the deadline where overpayments. Plus if this team isn't going anywhere why instead of remaining idle at the trade deadline did he not sell off assets that he won't resign next summer like Eberle?
I don't think so.Whatever hope we have depends upon our goalies standing on their heads.
Great point but that was king of a no brainer move.
I don't think so.
The success that they've had this year was due to a complete commitment to a defensive structure rather than just goalies stealing games. Obviously the offense (and PP) has to wake up but there's more to this team than just the goalies.
Even if he could not get one of the big names, he could have done something to at least give us a fighting chance if injuries finally struck after we had been lucky all season on that front. Instead he did nothing and now we are team that will likely still go into the playoffs, but with a lottery pick game lineup that has no shot. Very sad after how much the team had overachieved all season to get to first place that he did nothing to help these guys.OUR evaluation year of LL starts this summer.
Everything he's done up to now has been pretty boilerplate. That's not a knock, but the moves he's made were fairly obvious ones, though I do give him excellent marks for not getting antsy at the TD just because we were in good position. He knew that no one move or player was going to make us a Cup contender this year.
Even if he could not get one of the big names, he could have done something to at least give us a fighting chance if injuries finally struck after we had been lucky all season on that front. Instead he did nothing and now we are team that will likely still go into the playoffs, but with a lottery pick game lineup that has no shot. Very sad after how much the team had overachieved all season to get to first place that he did nothing to help these guys.
You nailed it!
This is precisely my problem with Lou. Why did he wait until the deadline to go big game hunting?
Buffalo didn't wait when they obtained Skinner.
Calgary didn't wait when they traded with Carolina either. Lindholm would have been a great fit with this team.Nino wasn't a deadline acquisition either.
And not all trades at the deadline where overpayments. Plus if this team isn't going anywhere why instead of remaining idle at the trade deadline did he not sell off assets that he won't resign next summer like Eberle?
I don't think so.
The success that they've had this year was due to a complete commitment to a defensive structure rather than just goalies stealing games. Obviously the offense (and PP) has to wake up but there's more to this team than just the goalies.
Even if he could not get one of the big names, he could have done something to at least give us a fighting chance if injuries finally struck after we had been lucky all season on that front. Instead he did nothing and now we are team that will likely still go into the playoffs, but with a lottery pick game lineup that has no shot. Very sad after how much the team had overachieved all season to get to first place that he did nothing to help these guys.
Who said anything about an excuse. If anything I am saying the opposite to what you are arguing that I am saying. My point is the team will now use injuries and being banged up and worn down, all that crap, as an excuse when they lose in 4 or 5 games in the first round because their GM did not add any depth. My point also has nothing to do with "anything can happen." The "anything can happen" mantra would be relevant if I said we had to get Stone and Duchene or bust, all in and see what happens. While I would not have been opposed to that, no that is not what I have been saying. I said there were plenty of guys out there who went for 3rd round picks and others who might have if it was offered that could have at best been upgrades, and at worst be slotted into the lineups when we have injuries. Lou gave us no shot to even be competitive in the playoffs if a couple of guys went down with injuries. Looking at our current lineup is all the evidence you should need of this. That lineup is non competitive.He, like everyone else, was likely waiting to see if the Islanders start was just a fluke. You don't want to make a Vanek trade and then miss the playoffs.
Agreed. There's a reason why our goaltending is letting up more goals when this team is playing poorly. They aren't standing on their heads every night stealing games for the team.
Wait, I thought every team has injuries and injuries aren't an excuse?
If the team overachieved, why make a middling move that doesn't actually help the team become a contender. It's an absolute waste. Spare me the, "anything can happen" mantra because the scenario you're talking about has not happened in the modern NHL.
Very well said and exactly right on all counts.I'm the biggest Lou and Trotz supporter here.
I had no desire to see valuable futures be moved for big names that would likely walk on July 1st, much less even more foolish moves. As expected, Lou didn't take such drastic measures. Hooray to that!
I had thoroughly expected a tweak that would directly address at least one of several clear weaknesses shown by this team, an outfit that otherwise has its act together.
Nonetheless, the Trade Deadline is proving to have been a FAIL.
The things we lacked at the deadline have been emphasized and put on blatant display at the most crucial juncture of the year. They are the exact things that are most hampering this team at this very moment - even worse than they had before the Trade Deadline.
Thus, having done NOTHING to even and try to address the already existing ills has lead to this team reaching a new level of failure in just these weaknesses. They've intensified. Clearly, the 55 games in which this team couldn't turn its PP into a weapon and in which there was no adequate sixth top 6 forward should have been understood as a very ample measuring stick. They should have been seen as a cry for help, not a vote of confidence.
No matter the reasoning behind Lou's inaction, any objective rating of Lou's work this year must include a critical look at the non-action taken in addressing two very clear-cut deficiencies.
For they are haunting us now with reckless abandon...
I'm the biggest Lou and Trotz supporter here.
I had no desire to see valuable futures be moved for big names that would likely walk on July 1st, much less even more foolish moves. As expected, Lou didn't take such drastic measures. Hooray to that!
I had thoroughly expected a tweak that would directly address at least one of several clear weaknesses shown by this team, an outfit that otherwise has its act together.
Nonetheless, the Trade Deadline is proving to have been a FAIL.
The things we lacked at the deadline have been emphasized and put on blatant display at the most crucial juncture of the year. They are the exact things that are most hampering this team at this very moment - even worse than they had before the Trade Deadline.
Thus, having done NOTHING to even and try to address the already existing ills has lead to this team reaching a new level of failure in just these weaknesses. They've intensified. Clearly, the 55 games in which this team couldn't turn its PP into a weapon and in which there was no adequate sixth top 6 forward should have been understood as a very ample measuring stick. They should have been seen as a cry for help, not a vote of confidence.
No matter the reasoning behind Lou's inaction, any objective rating of Lou's work this year must include a critical look at the non-action taken in addressing two very clear-cut deficiencies.
For they are haunting us now with reckless abandon...
Who said anything about an excuse. If anything I am saying the opposite to what you are arguing that I am saying. My point is the team will now use injuries and being banged up and worn down, all that crap, as an excuse when they lose in 4 or 5 games in the first round because their GM did not add any depth. My point also has nothing to do with "anything can happen." The "anything can happen" mantra would be relevant if I said we had to get Stone and Duchene or bust, all in and see what happens. While I would not have been opposed to that, no that is not what I have been saying. I said there were plenty of guys out there who went for 3rd round picks and others who might have if it was offered that could have at best been upgrades, and at worst be slotted into the lineups when we have injuries. Lou gave us no shot to even be competitive in the playoffs if a couple of guys went down with injuries. Looking at our current lineup is all the evidence you should need of this. That lineup is non competitive.
In a bubble, the deadline may be a failure, but we don't live in a bubble. What is the point in addressing our center depth with a mediocre move if we're not winning the cup anyway?
If we made a move he would be complaining about how much we gave up.It's not a competitive lineup even with the moves you're talking about. They weren't going to win the cup with the moves you're talking about. Why did you want those moves? Just to be "competitive," whatever the heck that means?
The team trades for Coyle and gets bounced in round 1 or 2, wow, what a great move. So glad we were "competitive" for the playoffs.
In a bubble, the deadline may be a failure, but we don't live in a bubble. What is the point in addressing our center depth with a mediocre move if we're not winning the cup anyway?