Come on, I never said that what you said was too vague. Who isn't reading now... I said your post was useless because it brought nothing to the conversation. Try to understand/read what I type...
You should stop repeating the same awkward question and try to come up with something pertinent and clear.
Your usual rhetoric is awkward and filled with unessary tangents. Also, I don't keep track of you position on things. So I don't assume anything and no one should have to. Just write clearly. Normal people would say "stoping the pucks" not "getting to pucks" because they don't mean the same thing. You want me to assume that you don't use words properly? Nah, I give you more credit than that.
Actually you said "I called your opinion useless because instead of explaining why you think that Bob will bounce back and why our defensive faults wouldn't lead to a similar level of problems for him, you just laughed it off"
In other words, you called my opinion useless because I didn't explain myself. As in- too vague.
NOW you're changing it to "because it brings nothing to the conversation."
Also, if you don't keep track of my position on things, how can you say my usual rhetoric is... anything?
Normal people can't tell that "stopping the pucks" and "getting to the pucks" means the same thing? LOL
OK- "is he not
stopping the pucks because he lost his ability or because his team has let him down?"
^rephrased, still means the same thing.
You don't understand what I said? Ask. Don't [mod] incorrectly nitpick at things you don't understand while telling me I don't understand. Really.
