Right Perron was carrying him. Another great point.He can be. But there’s nothing to the eye that really pops as a glaring issue in his game specifically. It’s much more feasible in my bid our minds that his down season stat wise is much more attributed to circumstances CS own ability.
I know it’s easy to be 14 and look at stats and go on a forum and say he’s washed, he can’t skate anymore. But in all reality, watching 90% of the games, his skating isn’t any different than it was when he won the conn smythe. The only different looking thing to his game is not having a two man game with Perron anymore.
I’m agreeing with the Blues fans. I don’t have any issue with what you said. Nothing is ROR’s fault. He shouldn’t be considered a driver.Since you have an issue with my response to it,
Do you also agree that ROR "might fetch STL less than all of Tarasenko, Barba and Acciari" ... lol
Or is it you think the comparison of Foligno's 19-20 season (and past) aligns with ROR's 21-22 season (and past) ... lol
WAR, what is it good for
And was traded almost a month before the deadline. And was traded to a team that is (a) in NYC and (b) potentially in the playoffs--if he didn't threaten to use the NTC to steer the trade, it isn't really relevant.DATA POINT ... Tarasenko is a -18 this year and had a NTC and still got a 1st ...
The data point is on the +/- that is being used in argument to limit ROR's return ...And was traded almost a month before the deadline. And was traded to a team that is (a) in NYC and (b) potentially in the playoffs--if he didn't threaten to use the NTC to steer the trade, it isn't really relevant.
Right Perron was carrying him. Another great point.
I’m agreeing with the Blues fans. I don’t have any issue with what you said. Nothing is ROR’s fault. He shouldn’t be considered a driver.
Good I’m glad we are at an understanding now.Infuriated? Did your spell check mess with what you meant to say?
We are agreeing. I'm not sure what your issue is.
DATA POINT ... Tarasenko is a -18 this year and had a NTC and still got a 1st ...
Exactly, while Tarasenko fell off his goal scoring pace, ROR's goal scoring is right in line with his normal 20+ rate, another good pointHe's also on pace for 20+ goals and 60+ points.
Nope how bout 1st 2023 and bouchard.Oilers have been showcasing Foegore the past 2 months. Foegore and conehead for ROR
Best defensive center in the league the last 5 years not named Bergeron.If ROR is dealt to Edmonton....can he play defense?
So Tarasenko with 10G, 29p and -18 in 38 games got a 1st,DATA POINT ... Tarasenko is a -18 this year and had a NTC and still got a 1st ...
For what is the very many-eth time I've said it (not saying you have to have seen it, just that I do say it a lot), the top piece for ROR will be a 1st round pick*. There will be a + and I am watching the musical chairs game as it develops to see how close Armstrong will end up to his hoped for valuation of Giroux last season. Since Giroux got a deferred first it's possible the pick will be a 2024 1st.So Tarasenko with 10G, 29p and -18 in 38 games got a 1st,
What do you think a guy who has been injured and has 10G, 16p and is -28 in 37 games will get?
I mean, we all want to use data points, but I'm curious what you think.
Lol ror is getting first and prospect...enjoySo Tarasenko with 10G, 29p and -18 in 38 games got a 1st,
What do you think a guy who has been injured and has 10G, 16p and is -28 in 37 games will get?
I mean, we all want to use data points, but I'm curious what you think.
ROR for a 1st and Knies sounds good to me
Huh? I don't have to enjoy or hate it either way. I was just commenting on the post that said 'data point' regarding Tank regarding the potential ROR trade. If that's not a good data point, then fine, but I wasn't the one who posted that. Was just curious what the poster was implying.Lol ror is getting first and prospect...enjoy