I think we go Raanta & Grubaeur. Best value and both guys are young quality goalies.
It's definitely a good option, but I think it's much more complicated than just concluding that - as one needs to consider the relative value of different exposed guys on each team, and positional selection requirements, etc.
I think we go Raanta & Grubaeur. Best value and both guys are young quality goalies.
If you're talking about how we can get a quality skater from Washington or NY where as we can get a goalie from a team with not as good skaters then I agree. But I really like that combination of goalies.
Yep - that's exactly what I mean. You have to consider the comparable value of #1 and #2-3 options on each team, and positional selection requirements, before really settling on who should be selected.
Then add in the trades that will be made and trying to guess who the goalies will be after the draft will be nearly impossible.
Assuming the reports of Sakic protecting Varlamov are true (which is nuts), Vegas would be smart to take Pickard and Grubauer, both because they are RFAs/will be RFAs after next year and because Colorado and Washington are unlikely to have anyone else exposed who is particularly enticing. But it depends how old school GMGM wants to be about having a veteran goalie for "stability," or if a team is offering assets to take on a bad goalie contract (e.g. Lehtonen).
Varlamov
Ullmark (backup)
No thanks! Varlamov is coming off of a horrible season and a ton of off ice baggage.
You are more than welcome to take Pickard.
Agreed.I think we take a skater from Colorado
You are more than welcome to take Pickard.
Agreed.
I think Luongo or Reimer will be picked from the Panthers. Lu has starter money for just two more seasons, then is cheap thereafter, and can be traded freely until the end of next season, when a modified 5-team trade clause kicks in, perfect for the Knights to trade him at the deadline or commit to him for one more season.
I guess FLA will protect Reimer. Drafting Luongo would be a big mistake because of his cap penalty once he retires. There are so many other options without such disadvantages.
Pickard just turned 25 and Grubauer turns 27 in November, but I see no harm in going with two young goalies and letting them battle it out
Rather have Grabner than Raanta.
I could be wrong but isn't Grabner a UFA?
If Fleury waives his NMC, Murray can be protected.
We then can auction Fleury if someone wants him, of course only if we can get something in return.
If other teams have to pay us to get Fleury, they could get Fleury from PIT directly and much cheaper.
Therefore we won't draft Fleury because we won't make a profit.
If Fleury waives his NMC and nobody wants him he will stay in PIT.
At his salary and term I wouldn't want Fleury in Vegas. I'm on bord if we use the draft as an auction to get assets.
Of course things can change. Is Murray in a slump? Is it really the best idea to get rid of Fleury? If Fleury won't waive PIT might have to buy him out.