Post-Game Talk: Just not good enough, Jets lose 2-1

Status
Not open for further replies.

hn777

Registered User
Apr 22, 2019
666
1,228
I like Ehlers but he's played on the #1 line for a few games now and it's not like he was lighting it up , i just think Maurice was trying to get offense from another line . Guys have been moving all around and i think this will keep happening until they string some wins together .
This is not correct, every stretch Ehlers has played with Scheifele he has been PPG (even with low special teams opportunity).

I liked Harkins on the topline, but why break up something that worked well (the 2015-line)?
Now, we have Appleton playing 7 minutes on the 4th line.

And, we were stringing wins together.
 

LowLefty

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Dec 29, 2016
7,246
12,962
I just want to know once and for all why Maurice hates Ehlers so much. It defies all logic and explanation and yet here we are.


I could speculate (and this is not my opinion, merely a possibility):

I don't think Mo likes players that are overly creative - or you could use the word "unpredictable"
Most of his better players are up and down the ice, pass, shoot, and hopefully hit the net. everyone once and a while these players try to run it through the defense but mainly they either pass or dump / chase on entry.

Ehlers is not that kind of player -
His zone entries are solid - best on the team but the up and down players he's lined up with have no idea where he's going or what he's going to do. In other words, he might be considered hard to play with from Mo's POV (possibly even the players POV). Mo might prefer a more conventional approach that includes less puck dragging, more passing, more to the net, more shooting, etc -

And I'm sticking to my disclaimer - this is purely speculation
 

macmaroon

Winnipeg Jets fan since 1972
Sponsor
Sep 3, 2011
9,924
35,870
Winnipeg Manitoba
www.macmaroon.com
Am I the only one who liked this game? Gave me a chance to catch up on my sleep... Nothing puts me out more than a boring hockey game...
giphy.gif
 

AKAChip

Registered User
Nov 19, 2013
3,162
4,561
Winnipeg
I could speculate (and this is not my opinion, merely a possibility):

I don't think Mo likes players that are overly creative - or you could use the word "unpredictable"
Most of his better players are up and down the ice, pass, shoot, and hopefully hit the net. everyone once and a while these players try to run it through the defense but mainly they either pass or dump / chase on entry.

Ehlers is not that kind of player -
His zone entries are solid - best on the team but the up and down players he's lined up with have no idea where he's going or what he's going to do. In other words, he might be considered hard to play with from Mo's POV (possibly even the players POV). Mo might prefer a more conventional approach that includes less puck dragging, more passing, more to the net, more shooting, etc -

And I'm sticking to my disclaimer - this is purely speculation
I don't think you're entirely wrong, but if there's even a nugget of truth in your speculation it's both sad and terrifying for the future of this team.

I have no doubt that Ehlers is a slightly unconventional player but the fact remains that every person he plays with puts up better numbers with him than without him. Both in the classic sense and in advanced metrics. P60 is a stat that is, or at least should be, appreciated by even those who scoff at advanced stats and he's the best on the team in that metric by far. That makes me skeptical that Ehlers is difficult to play with. I think it’s more like his skills are in areas that Maurice considers unimportant. And that should scare the lot of us.
 
Last edited:
Nov 24, 2006
8,132
14,432
Your second line cannot have Copp as it's centre
Yep. Like the player but he has no business there.

Why Mo didn’t juggle lines when it’s apparent that nothing good offensively is happening is a mystery. Move Wheeler there. Move Roslovic there.

Why on earth was Ehlers on the third line? Harkins looked good but Ehlers is a far bigger threat up there.

Really frustrated with this loss.
 

Jet

Free Capo!
Jul 20, 2004
33,409
32,939
Florida
You're a defensive defenseman that likes defensive defensemen, we get it. We needed a defenseman that could create offense today and Maurice chose Bitetto. Then we proceeded to score one goal.

I'm not saying we would have for sure won if we played Niku, but I believe we would have had a better chance of winning.
For the record I would have chosen Niku too. I also wouldn't have Ehlers on the bench when we had six attackers.

The fact remains that Niku in for Bitteto wouldn't have materially changed your op
 

sipowicz

The thrill is gone
Mar 16, 2011
31,658
41,245
Yep. Like the player but he has no business there.

Why Mo didn’t juggle lines when it’s apparent that nothing good offensively is happening is a mystery. Move Wheeler there. Move Roslovic there.

Why on earth was Ehlers on the third line? Harkins looked good but Ehlers is a far bigger threat up there.

Really frustrated with this loss.

another game where anyone with an iota of hockey knowledge says WTF Maurice!

and they extended this clown because?
 

Jet

Free Capo!
Jul 20, 2004
33,409
32,939
Florida
So glad, we didn't have to watch Ehlers with another great rush in the last minute of the game. After all, why did he pass to a D-man on the first one?

Zone entries are overvalued anyway, when we are only down one goal late in the game:sarcasm:
He's gotta be frustrated and I'm starting to think he's the forward going the other way in a trade.

Not happy about it one bit.
 

AKAChip

Registered User
Nov 19, 2013
3,162
4,561
Winnipeg
It seems that Maurice has his favorites and they don't seem to mesh with who we like, same goes for his lineups, don't think we will win either argument.
That’s completely fair. But this is a message board after all and voicing concerns and frustrations about a stubborn coach who was just extended for the foreseeable future is a necessary cathartic experience.
 

surixon

Registered User
Jul 12, 2003
49,024
70,084
Winnipeg
I could speculate (and this is not my opinion, merely a possibility):

I don't think Mo likes players that are overly creative - or you could use the word "unpredictable"
Most of his better players are up and down the ice, pass, shoot, and hopefully hit the net. everyone once and a while these players try to run it through the defense but mainly they either pass or dump / chase on entry.

Ehlers is not that kind of player -
His zone entries are solid - best on the team but the up and down players he's lined up with have no idea where he's going or what he's going to do. In other words, he might be considered hard to play with from Mo's POV (possibly even the players POV). Mo might prefer a more conventional approach that includes less puck dragging, more passing, more to the net, more shooting, etc -

And I'm sticking to my disclaimer - this is purely speculation

I think you have hit the nail on the head. He is the one skilled player that really hasn't conformed and simplified his offensive game. All of the other skilled players whether it be on defense or forward now play more of a simplified north/south game with limited risk at the offensive blue line. The other skilled players also play more of a cycle game (Even Laine) then Ehlers does.

I like Ehlers but he is likely the first high impact skilled player that gets moved out if it comes to that due to Maurice preferring different attributes.
 

pucka lucka

Registered User
Apr 7, 2010
5,913
2,581
Ottawa
I think you have hit the nail on the head. He is the one skilled player that really hasn't conformed and simplified his offensive game. All of the other skilled players whether it be on defense or forward now play more of a simplified north/south game with limited risk at the offensive blue line. The other skilled players also play more of a cycle game (Even Laine) then Ehlers does.

I like Ehlers but he is likely the first high impact skilled player that gets moved out if it comes to that due to Maurice preferring different attributes.
I know what I’d do when I need to make a call between elite team best player and career .500 coach who hasn’t won a thing.
 

surixon

Registered User
Jul 12, 2003
49,024
70,084
Winnipeg
I know what I’d do when I need to make a call between elite team best player and career .500 coach who hasn’t won a thing. f*ck this team already.

Oh I would move on from the coach first as well and I am sure most other orgs would as well.

We aren't going to get full value for him due to how undervalued he is by our coach here.
 

NorCalhockey

Registered User
Jan 6, 2017
3,240
3,390
So much frustration. We looked awful out there. How does a team with this much forward talent look this disorganized on the attack?

Zooming out a little, this team is one where Chevy wants to burn more picks on? We should be sellers for god sakes, or, at least just stay put with the roster as is and see what happens.

God , losing sucks, but it f*cking sucks when your club just has no idea what it wants to do or be. f*cking Sabres? Really?
Full disclosure: I root for both Sabres and Jets but since Jets are in a playoff spot while Sabres aren’t, I wanted Jets to win so they could solidify their position. Jets are almost at that point of needing help from other teams to make the playoffs. That’s a really dicey strategy since you want to put your destiny in your own hands. C’mon Jets - get it together!!!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad